【摘要】：做好科技項(xiàng)目管理工作,對(duì)科技項(xiàng)目進(jìn)行科學(xué)有效評(píng)價(jià),對(duì)于科技服務(wù)型企業(yè)進(jìn)行科技項(xiàng)目選擇,提高科技項(xiàng)目成果轉(zhuǎn)化率,實(shí)現(xiàn)有效投資具有重要作用。本文運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)分析、典型案例研究法、德?tīng)柗品?gòu)建科技項(xiàng)目選擇指標(biāo)體系并確定權(quán)重,運(yùn)用TOPSIS法進(jìn)行實(shí)例應(yīng)用。本文在查閱大量文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,首先,明確科技項(xiàng)目、科技項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)的定義,根據(jù)科技評(píng)價(jià)理論、項(xiàng)目管理理論和已有研究成果構(gòu)建了科技項(xiàng)目的初步篩選指標(biāo)體系。其次,本文運(yùn)用德?tīng)柗品▽?duì)企業(yè)、科研院所和高等院校的多位專家進(jìn)行調(diào)查,分析專家對(duì)指標(biāo)體系的了解情況,并確定各個(gè)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重。之后,根據(jù)我國(guó)發(fā)展領(lǐng)域的特點(diǎn),及TOPSIS法的優(yōu)勢(shì),本文選擇了TOPSIS評(píng)價(jià)模型作為科技項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)的方法。接下來(lái)根據(jù)已有的分析結(jié)果和實(shí)例,本文給出了相關(guān)的政策建議。最后,本文得出主要的結(jié)論：首先本文認(rèn)為在科技項(xiàng)目的篩選過(guò)程中,一級(jí)指標(biāo)中效益水平、應(yīng)用前景最為重要；二級(jí)指標(biāo)中市場(chǎng)規(guī)模、商業(yè)化能力、技術(shù)安全性、經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和應(yīng)用領(lǐng)域范圍最為重要,而項(xiàng)目管理狀況、社會(huì)效益并不十分重要。鑒于此,各個(gè)指標(biāo)的測(cè)量需要考慮實(shí)際的可行性,計(jì)算方法側(cè)重于編程,指標(biāo)體系需要進(jìn)一步完善。文中對(duì)企業(yè)承擔(dān)的5個(gè)具有代表性領(lǐng)域的科技項(xiàng)目進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià),較好地反應(yīng)了指標(biāo)體系的操作性,以及TOPSIS法的適用性。本文所構(gòu)建的指標(biāo)體系具有很好的理論和應(yīng)用價(jià)值,所提出的TOPSIS法適用于技術(shù)項(xiàng)目的篩選和評(píng)價(jià)。為今后科技服務(wù)企業(yè)科技項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)選擇提供了可行的選擇指標(biāo)體系以及較合理的綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法。
[Abstract]:It is very important for S & T service enterprises to make scientific and technological project selection, improve the conversion rate of scientific and technological project achievement and realize effective investment by doing well the scientific and technological project management and evaluating the scientific and technological project scientifically and effectively. This paper uses literature analysis, typical case study method, Delphi method to construct scientific and technological project selection index system and determine the weight, and uses TOPSIS method to carry on the example application. On the basis of consulting a large number of literatures, this paper firstly defines the scientific and technological project and the evaluation of the scientific and technological project. According to the theory of scientific and technological evaluation, the theory of project management and the existing research results, the preliminary screening index system of the scientific and technological project is constructed. Secondly, this paper uses Delphi method to investigate many experts in enterprises, scientific research institutes and colleges and universities, analyzes the experts' understanding of the index system, and determines the weight of each index. Then, according to the characteristics of China's development field and the advantages of TOPSIS method, this paper chooses the TOPSIS evaluation model as the evaluation method of scientific and technological projects. Then, according to the existing analysis results and examples, this paper gives the relevant policy recommendations. Finally, this paper draws the main conclusions: first of all, this paper thinks that in the screening process of science and technology project, the benefit level of the first class index and the application prospect are the most important; The market scale, commercialization ability, technical security, economic benefit and the scope of application are the most important in the secondary index, but the project management condition and social benefit are not very important. In view of this, the measurement of each index needs to consider the practical feasibility, the calculation method focuses on programming, and the index system needs to be further improved. In this paper, five representative scientific and technological projects undertaken by enterprises are evaluated, which reflects the maneuverability of the index system and the applicability of TOPSIS method. The index system constructed in this paper has good theoretical and practical value. The proposed TOPSIS method is suitable for the screening and evaluation of technical projects. It provides a feasible index system and a more reasonable comprehensive evaluation method for the evaluation and selection of science and technology projects in science and technology service enterprises in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F204

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李景慧;;關(guān)于科研績(jī)效評(píng)估的思考[J];現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)科技;2010年21期

2 李銀朋;劉廣毅;;基于灰色綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法的科技項(xiàng)目選擇[J];大慶石油學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

3 仝允桓;科技評(píng)價(jià)理論與方法的體系結(jié)構(gòu)[J];科技成果縱橫;2003年05期

4 廖政權(quán);科技項(xiàng)目質(zhì)量管理體系研究[J];科技管理研究;2005年05期

5 龔旭,趙學(xué)文,李曉軒,劉細(xì)文;關(guān)于國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金績(jī)效評(píng)估的思考[J];科研管理;2004年04期

6 楊闖;王敬華;;公益性農(nóng)業(yè)科技項(xiàng)目的管理和評(píng)價(jià)[J];農(nóng)業(yè)科技管理;2011年04期

7 龍鎮(zhèn)輝;楊華波;;科技成果商業(yè)化運(yùn)作模式研究[J];科技管理研究;2014年13期

8 李勝武;;科技項(xiàng)目選擇及評(píng)價(jià)方法的探討[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);1992年05期

9 金振輝;汪善榮;何一民;;淺析我國(guó)科技評(píng)價(jià)的理論、方法和實(shí)踐[J];云南科技管理;2006年04期

10 胡筱丹;胡冰;;加快我國(guó)科技成果商業(yè)化的對(duì)策與建議[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2010年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張莉萍;科技項(xiàng)目社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)效益綜合評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2005年

2 李靜;項(xiàng)目成本管理系統(tǒng)的分析與研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2314889