雙方?jīng)_突特征下多評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)論協(xié)商組合方法
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-01-05 12:12
【摘要】:為探討解決在多屬性綜合評(píng)價(jià)中存在的“多方法評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)論非一致性”問(wèn)題,提出了雙方?jīng)_突特征下多評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)論協(xié)商組合評(píng)價(jià)的方法,該方法具有協(xié)調(diào)沖突意見(jiàn)、集成沖突雙方評(píng)價(jià)者偏好信息、組合優(yōu)化多評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)論等特點(diǎn),最后用一個(gè)算例驗(yàn)證了方法的有效性.
[Abstract]:In order to solve the problem of "inconsistency of multi-method evaluation conclusion" in multi-attribute comprehensive evaluation, this paper puts forward a method of multi-evaluation conclusion negotiation combination evaluation under the characteristics of conflict between two parties. This method has the ability to coordinate conflicting opinions. The advantages of integrating the preference information of the two evaluators and the multi-evaluation conclusions of combinatorial optimization are integrated. Finally, an example is given to verify the effectiveness of the method.
【作者單位】: 東北大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院 東北大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院
【基金】:國(guó)家科技部(2003EE550001) 國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(70472032)
【分類號(hào)】:C934
,
本文編號(hào):2401771
[Abstract]:In order to solve the problem of "inconsistency of multi-method evaluation conclusion" in multi-attribute comprehensive evaluation, this paper puts forward a method of multi-evaluation conclusion negotiation combination evaluation under the characteristics of conflict between two parties. This method has the ability to coordinate conflicting opinions. The advantages of integrating the preference information of the two evaluators and the multi-evaluation conclusions of combinatorial optimization are integrated. Finally, an example is given to verify the effectiveness of the method.
【作者單位】: 東北大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院 東北大學(xué)工商管理學(xué)院
【基金】:國(guó)家科技部(2003EE550001) 國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金(70472032)
【分類號(hào)】:C934
,
本文編號(hào):2401771
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/tongjijuecelunwen/2401771.html
最近更新
教材專著