發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-04 12:17

  本文選題：突發(fā)事件　切入點(diǎn)：應(yīng)急響應(yīng)　出處：《東北大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,世界各地各種突發(fā)事件頻繁發(fā)生,給社會(huì)安定和人民生命財(cái)產(chǎn)安全造成了巨大威脅。在這種背景下,及時(shí)有效地做出應(yīng)急響應(yīng)將有效降低突發(fā)事件所造成的損失。因此,在突發(fā)事件剛剛發(fā)生或出現(xiàn)某些征兆時(shí),如何從多個(gè)備選應(yīng)急方案或應(yīng)急預(yù)案中選擇最優(yōu)方案以最大限度地減少突發(fā)事件所造成的損失,是一個(gè)具有實(shí)際意義的重要研究課題。 本文以突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急決策理論、方法和應(yīng)用研究分析為切入點(diǎn),主要研究了兩個(gè)問題：第一個(gè)問題是,如何根據(jù)突發(fā)事件的已有信息對(duì)其可能的情景概率進(jìn)行估算。在突發(fā)事件發(fā)生時(shí),根據(jù)事件背景特征、專家知識(shí)和相似事件的歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)該突發(fā)事件可能出現(xiàn)的情景概率進(jìn)行估算；第二個(gè)問題是,如何在考慮應(yīng)急成本、事件后果的基礎(chǔ)上針對(duì)突發(fā)事件進(jìn)行應(yīng)急方案的選擇。由于在許多突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急決策過程中,決策者往往不是完全理性的。所以本文中考慮決策者在面臨高危害后果時(shí)行為規(guī)避的特征,在應(yīng)急過程中引入行為決策的相關(guān)研究成果。 本文主要完成了以下四個(gè)方面的研究工作： (1)提煉了一類突發(fā)事件風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策問題。針對(duì)許多突發(fā)事件的應(yīng)急問題都具有風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策的特征,本文主要提煉了一類具有高危害結(jié)果的突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急響應(yīng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)決策問題。 (2)提出了基于故障樹分析的情景概率計(jì)算方法。首先根據(jù)專家知識(shí)和相似事件的歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn),確定頂事件、中間事件和基本事件,并繪制故障樹；然后,根據(jù)專家知識(shí),確定不同應(yīng)急方案下,基本事件出現(xiàn)的概率；最后,根據(jù)頂事件、中間事件和基本事件之間的邏輯關(guān)系,計(jì)算中間事件和頂事件的概率。 (3)提出了基于前景理論的突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急方案選擇方法。首先,計(jì)算突發(fā)事件不同情景的綜合價(jià)值,即定量化描述針對(duì)不同情景的人員傷亡和財(cái)產(chǎn)損失的決策者綜合心理感知；然后,計(jì)算突發(fā)事件不同情景的權(quán)重,即定量化描述針對(duì)不同情景出現(xiàn)的重要性程度的決策者心理感知；在此基礎(chǔ)上,依據(jù)情景綜合價(jià)值、情景權(quán)重和應(yīng)急方案的成本投入,計(jì)算各應(yīng)急方案的綜合前景值,并依據(jù)綜合前景值的大小確定應(yīng)急方案排序。 (4)給出了考慮決策者行為的突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急響應(yīng)決策方法在傳染病應(yīng)急過程中的應(yīng)用研究。本文以我國北方某高校A突現(xiàn)H1N1病例的應(yīng)急決策過程為潛在應(yīng)用背景。驗(yàn)證了本文提出的應(yīng)急決策模型的合理性,其計(jì)算結(jié)果證明了模型的有效性。 在論文最后,總結(jié)了本文的主要研究成果及結(jié)論、研究的主要貢獻(xiàn)和局限以及需要進(jìn)一步開展的工作。
[Abstract]:In recent years, a variety of emergencies occur frequently around the world, which pose a great threat to social stability and the safety of people's lives and property.In this context, timely and effective emergency response will effectively reduce the losses caused by emergencies.Therefore, how to select the optimal scheme from multiple emergency options or contingency plans in order to minimize the losses caused by emergencies, when the emergency has just occurred or some symptoms have appeared.It is an important research topic with practical significance.Based on the theory, method and application of emergency decision making, this paper mainly studies two problems: the first problem is how to estimate the probability of possible scenarios according to the existing information of emergencies.In the event of an emergency, according to the background characteristics of the event, expert knowledge and historical experience of similar events, the probability of the scenario that the emergency may occur is estimated. The second problem is how to consider the emergency cost.On the basis of the consequence of the incident, the emergency plan is chosen for the unexpected event.In many emergency decision-making processes, decision-makers are often not completely rational.In this paper, we consider the characteristics of behavior evading in the face of high harm consequences, and introduce the relevant research results of behavior decision in the process of emergency response.This paper mainly completed the following four aspects of research:1) A kind of emergency risk decision problem is refined.In view of the fact that many emergent problems of emergencies have the characteristics of risk decision, this paper presents a kind of risk decision problems of emergency response of emergencies with high hazard results.(2) A scenario probability calculation method based on fault tree analysis is proposed.First, based on the expert knowledge and the historical experience of similar events, the top event, intermediate event and basic event are determined, and the fault tree is drawn. Then, according to the expert knowledge, the probability of the occurrence of the basic event under different emergency plans is determined; finally, the probability of the occurrence of the basic event is determined according to the expert knowledge.According to the logical relationship between top event, intermediate event and basic event, the probability of intermediate event and top event is calculated.3) the method of selecting emergency plan based on prospect theory is put forward.First of all, the comprehensive value of different scenarios of emergencies is calculated, that is, the comprehensive psychological perception of decision-makers who quantitatively describe the casualties and property losses in different scenarios, and then the weights of different scenarios of emergencies are calculated.That is to say, quantificationally describe the psychological perception of decision-makers in view of the importance of different scenarios, and calculate the comprehensive foreground value of each emergency plan according to the comprehensive value of the scenario, the weight of the scenario and the cost input of the emergency plan.And according to the size of the comprehensive foreground value to determine the emergency program order.4) the research on the application of emergency response decision method considering the behavior of decision makers in the process of infectious disease emergency response is presented.The background of this paper is the emergency decision-making process of A emergent H1N1 cases in a university in the north of China.The rationality of the proposed emergency decision model is verified, and the validity of the model is proved by the calculation results.At the end of the paper, the main research results and conclusions, the main contributions and limitations of the research and the work needed to be carried out are summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：C934;D035.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周曉猛;姜麗珍;張?jiān)讫?;突發(fā)事故下應(yīng)急資源優(yōu)化配置定量模型研究[J];安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

2 賈傳亮,池宏,計(jì)雷;基于多階段滅火過程的消防資源布局模型[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2005年09期

3 賀小容;秦江濤;;多層級(jí)應(yīng)急系統(tǒng)選址模型[J];工業(yè)工程;2010年02期

4 劉春林,施建軍,李春雨;模糊應(yīng)急系統(tǒng)組合優(yōu)化方案選擇問題的研究[J];管理工程學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

5 魏汝?duì)I;陳建宏;楊立兵;;突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急救援設(shè)施選址決策模型[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2009年11期

6 劉北林;馬婷;;應(yīng)急救災(zāi)物資緊急調(diào)度問題研究[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

7 姜卉;黃鈞,;;罕見重大突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急實(shí)時(shí)決策中的情景演變[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

8 陳志宗;尤建新;;重大突發(fā)事件應(yīng)急救援設(shè)施選址的多目標(biāo)決策模型[J];管理科學(xué);2006年04期

9 劉春林,何建敏,施建軍;供應(yīng)鏈的協(xié)作供應(yīng)問題研究[J];管理科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

10 方磊,何建敏;城市應(yīng)急系統(tǒng)優(yōu)化選址決策模型和算法[J];管理科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉明廣;復(fù)雜群決策系統(tǒng)協(xié)同優(yōu)化方法研究[D];天津大學(xué);2007年

2 王武平;面向群評(píng)價(jià)的混合多屬性群決策方法研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1709917