【摘要】：正近日,國內(nèi)多個網(wǎng)站都在盛傳深圳即將在全國率先試點(diǎn)開征遺產(chǎn)稅。其透露,試點(diǎn)方案規(guī)定,1000萬元以上的遺產(chǎn),適用稅率為50%,而且應(yīng)納稅金不能從遺產(chǎn)里出,且必須在三個月之內(nèi)交齊,否則全部收歸國有。不久,深圳相關(guān)部門便辟謠,這是假的。其實(shí),這樣的謠傳,深圳相關(guān)單位已經(jīng)辟謠過多次了。而這樣的謠言不斷傳出,我想,可能出自近年來國內(nèi)貧富漸漸懸殊,使人寄望于出臺遺產(chǎn)稅來調(diào)節(jié)的美好愿望吧。美國就是實(shí)行遺產(chǎn)稅的國家,通過對富
[Abstract]:Recently, a number of domestic websites are rumored that Shenzhen is about to take the lead in the national pilot levying estate tax. According to its disclosure, the pilot program stipulates that the applicable tax rate for estates above 10 million yuan is 50%, and taxable funds cannot be paid out of the estate and must be paid in three months, otherwise, all of them will be nationalized. Soon, the relevant departments in Shenzhen refuted rumors, this is false. In fact, such rumors, Shenzhen units have been refuted many times. And such rumors continue to spread, I think, probably from the fact that the gap between the rich and the poor in China has gradually widened in recent years, making people hope to introduce a estate tax to regulate it. The United States is the country that imposes estate tax, through the implementation of the rich
【分類號】：F817.12

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;企業(yè)交納稅金不能“包”——財政部稅務(wù)總局局長劉志城向本刊記者發(fā)表談話[J];財政;1983年03期

2 高仲良;勇開拓發(fā)展企業(yè) 納稅金奉獻(xiàn)國家──記三家納稅先進(jìn)私營企業(yè)[J];上海綜合經(jīng)濟(jì);2000年09期

3 唐輝;內(nèi)銷商品應(yīng)納稅金何時為負(fù)數(shù)[J];遼寧財稅;2002年08期

4 宋再科，，周萍華;談出售機(jī)器設(shè)備應(yīng)納稅金的處理[J];安徽稅務(wù);1994年10期

5 洪文成;致富不忘納稅[J];福建稅務(wù);1994年04期

6 ;雙周·觀點(diǎn)[J];南風(fēng)窗;2002年06期

7 薄越亮;張林虎;;舉例介紹利改稅第二步改革方案及其計算方法[J];會計之友;1984年04期

8 國華,王仰,樹華;只有繳了稅心里才踏實(shí)[J];稅收與企業(yè);1999年09期

9 劉瑞蒲;;增值稅計算中關(guān)于“上一經(jīng)營環(huán)節(jié)已納稅金”的思考[J];科學(xué)之友;2011年04期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 見習(xí)記者　唐紅珍 通訊員　朱華遠(yuǎn);鶴峰重點(diǎn)企業(yè)7個月稅收入庫2900萬元[N];恩施日報;2006年

本文編號：2325237