我國個人所得稅分類征收模式評析
[Abstract]:Although the current individual income tax classified collection mode in our country can carry out the collection and management work normally and raise a considerable amount of financial revenue, the drawback of the lack of tax fairness in the classified collection mode is gradually emerging. Therefore, our government has repeatedly proposed to establish a personal income tax collection model which combines classification with integration, but there is still a great deal of controversy about the reform of the collection model. This paper holds that before discussing the reform of the classified levy model, we should first make a comprehensive assessment of the classified levy model, and have a good understanding of its advantages and disadvantages, and take the existing problems as the core of the reform. On this basis, the reform of personal income tax in the future is moderately prospected. This paper holds that, considering the functions of individual income tax, the tax classification should follow the principles of finance, fairness and efficiency. Specifically, this paper holds that the classified levy model can better reflect the fiscal principle: although the classified levy model has the violation of the fiscal principle, it can be seen as a whole. It can guarantee the timely collection of tax in the low level of collection and management, which reflects the fiscal principle; the classified collection model violates the principle of fairness, although the classified collection model embodies the principle of fairness in some tax system design. However, the tax system design, including tax items, tax rates, expense deductions and so on, has a lot of contrary to the principle of fairness. The classified tax collection model well embodies the efficiency principle: the tax system design is relatively simple under the classified tax collection model. The cost of taxation is relatively low, and although it may not be conducive to the cultivation of tax awareness, it generally reflects the principle of efficiency. In a word, the advantage of the individual income tax classification in our country lies in that it can reflect the fiscal principle and efficiency principle of tax, and the deficiency is that there are many violations to the principle of fairness.
【學位授予單位】:首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F812.42
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 張奕;;大數(shù)據(jù)時代下網(wǎng)絡交易征稅的國際比較及經(jīng)驗借鑒[J];企業(yè)導報;2016年20期
2 李煒光;陳辰;;以家庭為單位征收個人所得稅的制度設計問題——基于三種所得稅征收模式的討論[J];南方經(jīng)濟;2014年08期
3 蔡秀云;周曉君;;我國個人所得稅調節(jié)收入分配效應研析[J];稅務研究;2014年07期
4 孫章偉;;日本基尼系數(shù)與再分配制度研究[J];現(xiàn)代日本經(jīng)濟;2013年02期
5 任致偉;;稅收在公平收入分配中的局限性研究[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2013年11期
6 劉尚希;;按家庭征個人所得稅會更公平嗎?——兼論我國個人所得稅改革的方向[J];涉外稅務;2012年10期
7 李林木;;個人所得稅征管中第三方信息的獲取與應用:基于國際比較的視角[J];稅務研究;2011年12期
8 賈康;梁季;;我國個人所得稅改革的回顧與展望[J];中國財政;2011年20期
9 高培勇;;邁出走向綜合與分類相結合個人所得稅制度的腳步[J];中國財政;2011年18期
10 劉隆亨;;我國個稅優(yōu)勢和不足以及改革完善的思考[J];稅收征納;2011年06期
相關博士學位論文 前3條
1 王長宇;中國稅收成本問題研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2016年
2 徐曄;我國個人所得稅現(xiàn)行課稅模式的弊端分析與改革研究[D];復旦大學;2014年
3 崔志坤;中國個人所得稅制度改革研究[D];財政部財政科學研究所;2011年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 李瑞玲;從個人所得稅流失論我國個人所得稅稅制改革[D];北京交通大學;2013年
2 董巍峰;基于公平視角下的我國個人所得稅研究[D];上海師范大學;2012年
,本文編號:2257683
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/2257683.html