本文選題：公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付 + 收入不平等　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付作為調(diào)節(jié)收入再分配的一種手段,可能會對家庭收入產(chǎn)生直接和間接影響。那么,中國的公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付制度是把我國的貧富差距拉大了還是縮小了呢?是否改善了低收入人群的收入呢?是否應(yīng)該對現(xiàn)階段的社會福利體系進行相應(yīng)的調(diào)整以降低收入不平等呢?研究公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付對家庭收入不平等的影響不僅能為公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付對于不平等的影響提供新的經(jīng)驗證據(jù),亦能為政府在制定反貧困、調(diào)節(jié)收入不平等政策時提供一定的理論依據(jù),也能為在宏觀層面研究轉(zhuǎn)移支付與收入不平等的關(guān)系時提供微觀旁證。 本文主要包括五部分： 第一章為緒論,主要介紹論文所要研究的問題、相關(guān)概念界定以及研究創(chuàng)新與不足。第二章為文獻綜述,主要介紹了相關(guān)收入分配理論、轉(zhuǎn)移支付的相關(guān)理論以及我國關(guān)于收入不平等的研究進展。第三章為模型選擇,主要介紹收入決定方程以及夏普利值分解。第四章為實證分析,首先對中國健康與養(yǎng)老追蹤調(diào)查問卷進行整理,然后對家庭公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付收入、家庭特征變量、家庭收入等變量進行樣本的描述性統(tǒng)計。其次是實證分析,建立回歸方程,分析戶主變量(戶主受教育程度、年齡、健康狀況),家庭特征變量(家庭勞動率、金融資產(chǎn)、土地、家用電器),家庭公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付收入對家庭收入的影響。通過回歸方程再進行夏普利值分解,觀察各個變量對家庭收入不平等的貢獻值。另外,根據(jù)東部、中西部,城鄉(xiāng)分組分析各個變量對家庭收入不平的貢獻值。第五章為結(jié)論及建議,從實證分析結(jié)論出發(fā),針對我國家庭間的收入不平等提出相應(yīng)建議。 實證結(jié)果顯示：公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付對家庭收入不平等的解釋程度達到37.99%,中國的公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付并沒有減輕家庭間收入的不平等而是加劇了家庭間的收入不平等。出現(xiàn)這種結(jié)果的可能原因是：公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付往往瞄準(zhǔn)的是擁有正規(guī)工作的就業(yè)人群,并沒有真正的覆蓋到貧困家庭或者弱勢群體。另外,從分析結(jié)果來看,戶主受教育程度為影響家庭收入不平等的第二大要素,對家庭間收入差距的解釋程度達到8.63%。資本市場的擴大對我國家庭間收入不平等的作用日益增強,金融資產(chǎn)等財產(chǎn)性收入已成為僅次于工資、公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付收入,影響家庭間收入不平等的第三大因素。 從東部與中西部、城鄉(xiāng)分組來看,公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付對家庭間收入不平等的解釋程度中西部地區(qū)要大于東部地區(qū),農(nóng)村地區(qū)要大于城市地區(qū)。出現(xiàn)上述結(jié)果的原因可能是由于中西部、農(nóng)村地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展相對落后,擁有正規(guī)工作的人群相對較少,而東部、城市地區(qū)經(jīng)濟相對發(fā)達,國企等正規(guī)企事業(yè)單位數(shù)量明顯高于中西部以及農(nóng)村地區(qū),擁有正規(guī)工作的人群相對較多,公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付涉及的人群相對較多所致。
[Abstract]:As a means of regulating income redistribution, public transfer payment may have direct and indirect effects on household income. So, does China's public transfer payment system widen or narrow the gap between the rich and the poor? Has it improved the incomes of low-income people? Should the current social welfare system be adjusted accordingly to reduce income inequality? Studying the impact of public transfer payment on household income inequality can not only provide new empirical evidence for the impact of public transfer payment on inequality, but also can help the government to formulate anti-poverty. The adjustment of income inequality policy provides some theoretical basis and provides microscopic circumstantial evidence for the study of the relationship between transfer payment and income inequality at the macro level. This paper mainly includes five parts: the first chapter is the introduction, which mainly introduces the problems to be studied, the definition of relevant concepts, and the innovation and insufficiency of the research. The second chapter is a literature review, mainly introduces the related income distribution theory, transfer payment theory and the research progress of income inequality in China. The third chapter is the model selection, mainly introduces the income determinant equation and Sharpley value decomposition. The fourth chapter is empirical analysis, first of all, the Chinese health and old-age tracking questionnaire is sorted out, and then the sample descriptive statistics on the family public transfer payment income, family characteristic variables, family income and other variables are carried out. The second is empirical analysis, the establishment of regression equations, analysis of the head of household variables (head of household education, age, health status), family characteristics variables (household labor rate, financial assets, land, Household appliances), the impact of family income on household income from public transfer payments. Then the regression equation was decomposed to observe the contribution of variables to household income inequality. In addition, according to the eastern, central and western, urban and rural groups analyze the contribution of various variables to household income inequality. The fifth chapter is the conclusion and the suggestion, from the empirical analysis conclusion, puts forward the corresponding suggestion to the income inequality between the families in our country. The empirical results show that the public transfer payment explains the inequality of household income to 37.99 degree, and the public transfer payment in China does not alleviate the inequality of income between families, but exacerbates the income inequality among families. The likely reason for this is that public transfer payments tend to target people with regular jobs and do not really reach poor families or vulnerable groups. In addition, from the analysis results, the education level of the head of household is the second factor that affects the income inequality of the household, and the explanation of the income gap between families reaches 8.63. The expansion of capital market plays an increasingly important role in income inequality among families in China. Property income, such as financial assets, has become the third major factor affecting income inequality among households, which is second only to wages, public transfer payment income and so on. From the perspective of the eastern, central and western regions and urban and rural groups, the extent of the explanation of income inequality between families in the central and western regions is greater in the central and western regions than in the eastern regions, and in the rural areas is larger than that in the urban areas. The reasons for this may be that the economic development of the central and western regions, the rural areas are relatively backward, the number of people with formal jobs is relatively small, while the eastern and urban areas have relatively developed economies. The number of formal enterprises and institutions such as state-owned enterprises is obviously higher than that of the central and western regions and rural areas, the number of people with formal work is relatively large, and the number of people involved in public transfer payment is relatively more.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F812.45;F124.7

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周金燕;鐘宇平;;教育對中國收入不平等變遷的作用:1991～2006[J];北京大學(xué)教育評論;2010年04期

2 宋衛(wèi)星,崔恒建;線性測量誤差模型的lack-of-fit檢驗[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2002年04期

3 屈小博;;城市正規(guī)就業(yè)與非正規(guī)就業(yè)收入差距及影響因素貢獻——基于收入不平等的分解[J];財經(jīng)論叢;2011年02期

4 龔鋒;盧洪友;;機會平等與財政轉(zhuǎn)移支付[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2010年11期

5 顧昕;方黎明;;公共財政體系與農(nóng)村新型合作醫(yī)療籌資水平研究——促進公共服務(wù)橫向均等化的制度思考[J];財經(jīng)研究;2006年11期

6 解堊;;公共轉(zhuǎn)移支付和私人轉(zhuǎn)移支付對農(nóng)村貧困、不平等的影響:反事實分析[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2010年12期

7 王海濤;;中國城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距不斷擴大的原因及其解決方策[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年04期

8 黃祖輝,王敏,萬廣華;我國居民收入不平等問題:基于轉(zhuǎn)移性收入角度的分析[J];管理世界;2003年03期

9 陳光金;;中國收入不平等:U型變化與不確定的未來[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2010年05期

10 石子印;;政府再分配政策對城鎮(zhèn)居民收入不平等作用的實證考察[J];經(jīng)濟經(jīng)緯;2009年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王輝;中國農(nóng)村居民收入不平等問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：2070640