發(fā)布時間：2018-06-06 04:20

  本文選題：房地產(chǎn)保有稅 + 稅制��； 參考：《吉林大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國的房地產(chǎn)稅收體系長期以來重流轉而輕保有，這是社會主義初級階段生產(chǎn)力不發(fā)達、人民生活水平較低的基本國情決定的。但是隨著我國經(jīng)濟實力的不斷提升和房地產(chǎn)市場的不斷發(fā)展，大范圍征收房地產(chǎn)保有稅的物質基礎已經(jīng)基本具備。而且由于房地產(chǎn)保有稅的稅制設計遠遠落后于房地產(chǎn)市場的發(fā)展水平，也導致了我國房地產(chǎn)的價格偏高、投機行為盛行等問題。因此，房地產(chǎn)保有稅的稅制改革勢在必行。 目前，我國房地產(chǎn)保有環(huán)節(jié)的稅收主要是針對營業(yè)性房地產(chǎn)征收，稅種主要包括房產(chǎn)稅和城鎮(zhèn)土地使用稅。但房地產(chǎn)保有稅的稅制目標比較模糊，致使稅種之間存在稅收效應相互抵制等問題；其次房地產(chǎn)保有稅的稅制設計陳舊，在稅種、計稅依據(jù)、稅率、稅收優(yōu)惠、稅收征管等多個方面，與國際通行的“寬稅基、低稅率、減稅種”的稅收原則不符，也與我國的基本國情相悖，致使稅收的財政汲取功能、經(jīng)濟調(diào)節(jié)功能和收入分配功能無法充分發(fā)揮；再者，相關的法規(guī)制度也無法滿足房地產(chǎn)保有稅的實施要求，降低了房地產(chǎn)保有稅的實施效果和效率。 在分析了我國房地產(chǎn)保有稅稅制缺陷的基礎上，本文搜集并分析了典型發(fā)達國家和地區(qū)房地產(chǎn)保有稅的稅制設計。其中英美兩國的房地產(chǎn)保有稅歷史悠久，較為完善；日韓兩國面臨著人均房地產(chǎn)資源緊張的國情，其房地產(chǎn)保有稅的稅制設計對我國有較好的借鑒意義；香港和臺灣是我國僅有的普遍征收房地產(chǎn)保有稅的省市，在房地產(chǎn)保有稅的設計和征收方面已經(jīng)積累了部分經(jīng)驗。 基于此，文章最后提出了我國房地產(chǎn)保有稅稅制改革的可行策略，指出我國房地產(chǎn)保有稅的稅制目標應該包括充實地方財政、規(guī)范房地產(chǎn)市場運行和調(diào)節(jié)財富分配三個方面；在具體的稅制設計方面應簡化稅種，征收統(tǒng)一的房地產(chǎn)保有稅、以房地產(chǎn)的評估價值為計稅依據(jù)、采用超額累進稅率、合理調(diào)整房地產(chǎn)保有稅的優(yōu)惠范圍、加強稅收征管等；此外，還應完善相關的法規(guī)制度，保證房地產(chǎn)保有稅的順利推行。
[Abstract]:The real estate tax system of our country for a long time emphasizes the circulation but not the maintenance, which is decided by the basic national conditions of the undeveloped productive forces and the low living standard of the people in the primary stage of socialism. However, with the constant improvement of economic strength and the development of real estate market, the material basis of levying real estate retention tax on a large scale has been basically available. Because the tax system design of the real estate tax is far behind the development level of the real estate market, it also leads to the high price of the real estate and the prevalence of speculation in our country. Therefore, the real estate tax system reform is imperative. At present, the taxation of real estate in our country is mainly aimed at the business real estate, which mainly includes property tax and urban land use tax. However, the tax target of the real estate tenure tax is rather vague, which leads to some problems such as resisting each other's tax effect. Secondly, the tax system of the real estate tenure tax is designed to be obsolete, and the tax type, tax basis, tax rate, tax preference, etc. Tax collection and management and other aspects are inconsistent with the internationally accepted tax principles of "broad tax base, low tax rate, and tax reduction type", and are also contrary to the basic national conditions of our country, resulting in the fiscal absorption function of taxation. The function of economic regulation and income distribution can not be brought into full play. Furthermore, the relevant laws and regulations can not meet the requirements of the implementation of the real estate tenure tax, which reduces the effect and efficiency of the implementation of the real estate tenure tax. On the basis of analyzing the defects of China's real estate tax system, this paper collects and analyzes the tax system design of the typical developed countries and regions. Britain and America have a long history of real estate tax, Japan and South Korea are faced with the situation of real estate resources per capita, the tax system design of real estate tenure tax has a good reference significance for our country. Hong Kong and Taiwan are the only provinces and cities that generally collect real estate tax. They have accumulated some experience in the design and collection of real estate tax. Based on this, the article finally puts forward the feasible strategy of reforming the tax system of the real estate tenure tax in our country, and points out that the tax system goal of the real estate tax system in our country should include three aspects: enriching the local finance, standardizing the operation of the real estate market and regulating the distribution of wealth; In the specific tax system design, we should simplify the tax category, collect the unified real estate retention tax, take the evaluation value of the real estate as the tax basis, adopt the excess progressive tax rate, rationally adjust the preferential scope of the real estate retention tax, and strengthen the tax collection and management. In addition, we should improve the relevant laws and regulations to ensure the smooth implementation of real estate tax.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F812.42;F299.23

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 董鴻波;;稅收中性與房地產(chǎn)稅制改革[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學報;2006年01期

2 文林峰;;宏觀調(diào)控政策的反思與未來發(fā)展走向[J];中華建設;2006年Z1期

3 陳多長,蹤家峰;房地產(chǎn)稅收與住宅資產(chǎn)價格:理論分析與政策評價[J];財貿(mào)研究;2004年01期

4 國家稅務總局課題組;劉佐;靳東升;龔輝文;;借鑒國際經(jīng)驗 進一步優(yōu)化中國中長期稅制結構[J];財政研究;2009年05期

5 許經(jīng)勇,馬原;穩(wěn)定房地產(chǎn)價格的關鍵在于實現(xiàn)有效供求平衡[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學版);2005年09期

6 文林峰;增加中低價位商品住宅供應量的政策建議[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2005年02期

7 白云;;西方典型發(fā)達國家物業(yè)稅發(fā)展情況比較研究[J];河北法學;2006年05期

8 王洋;房地產(chǎn)調(diào)控的宏觀視角——基于與宏觀經(jīng)濟關系的分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟研究;2005年10期

9 謝群松;論中國不動產(chǎn)占有課稅的改革[J];經(jīng)濟研究參考;2002年90期

10 王遙;;物業(yè)稅調(diào)節(jié)房價，焦點是解決供需問題[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè)銀行;2006年08期

相關博士學位論文 前4條

1 董蕾;美國不動產(chǎn)稅研究[D];吉林大學;2011年

2 李晶;中國房地產(chǎn)稅收制度改革研究[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2011年

3 辛浩;我國地方稅種收入能力測算方法及應用研究[D];華中科技大學;2009年

4 王宛巖;我國不動產(chǎn)課稅制度研究[D];財政部財政科學研究所;2010年

，

本文編號：1985056