本文關(guān)鍵詞：武漢市政府機(jī)關(guān)“三公”經(jīng)費公開研究　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： “三公”經(jīng)費 政府信息公開 規(guī)范化

【摘要】：“三公”經(jīng)費公開是政府的法定義務(wù),是依法治國中心環(huán)節(jié)的要求,是實現(xiàn)公民知情權(quán)和保障民主政治正常運行的重要條件,是黨風(fēng)廉政建設(shè)和反腐敗的切入點。近年來,黨和政府不斷強調(diào)“三公”經(jīng)費的公開,中央政府各部門以及地方各級政府都不同程度的貫徹此項要求,將“三公”經(jīng)費公開作為政府信息公開的核心內(nèi)容之一。武漢市人民政府更是在其門戶網(wǎng)站上積極開辟專門板塊對各政府部門的“三公”經(jīng)費進(jìn)行公開。本文選擇武漢市屬行政機(jī)關(guān)共42個部門101份“三公”經(jīng)費公開文本為樣本進(jìn)行研究分析,時間從2010年度到2013年度。結(jié)合國際通用數(shù)據(jù)公開標(biāo)準(zhǔn),綜合運用內(nèi)容分析法、文獻(xiàn)研究法、描述性統(tǒng)計分析等方法對文本的完整性、具體性、及時性、便利性、易懂性進(jìn)行分析,分析結(jié)果顯示,從總體上看,“三公”經(jīng)費公開報告的質(zhì)量是逐年有所提高的,但是距離國際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)還有一定的差距。主要表現(xiàn)為內(nèi)容籠統(tǒng)簡單、細(xì)化程度不夠、交叉檢驗難以實現(xiàn)、公眾看明白不易,公而不細(xì)是其最大也是最核心的問題。本研究主要包括五個部分。第一部分是緒論,主要是研究背景及意義、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、研究方法。第二部分是理論及方法概述,主要是明確“三公”經(jīng)費的含義,了解“三公”經(jīng)費公開的相關(guān)理論基礎(chǔ)以及內(nèi)容分析法。第三部分則是在明確內(nèi)容分析法的基礎(chǔ)上對整個研究設(shè)計進(jìn)行簡單明了的介紹,并結(jié)合國際通用數(shù)據(jù)公布規(guī)范對“三公”經(jīng)費公開文本的規(guī)范性及系統(tǒng)性建立分析標(biāo)準(zhǔn),為實證研究分析部分奠定基礎(chǔ)。第四部分是實證研究分析,通過時間維度的縱向比較和橫向維度的部門比較,對“三公”經(jīng)費公開文本的完整性、具體性、及時性、便利性、易懂性進(jìn)行分析,以期發(fā)現(xiàn)某些規(guī)律或者問題。最后一部分則是依據(jù)前文的分析做出相應(yīng)的結(jié)論分析,并根據(jù)分析結(jié)果進(jìn)行大膽的原因分析,提出針對性的措施：完善相關(guān)法律法規(guī),指導(dǎo)“三公”經(jīng)費公開的規(guī)范化；解放思想,重視“三公”經(jīng)費的公開與監(jiān)督；形成機(jī)制,保障“三公”經(jīng)費公開的規(guī)范化。本文的主要創(chuàng)新點：一方面將GDDS(數(shù)據(jù)公布通用系統(tǒng))與我國信息公開文本進(jìn)行比較,構(gòu)建數(shù)據(jù)質(zhì)量分析的指標(biāo),并以此為分析框架進(jìn)行論文主體部分的行文；另一方面使用內(nèi)容分析法,并結(jié)合描述性統(tǒng)計方法對文本質(zhì)量的科學(xué)性和系統(tǒng)性進(jìn)行研究。
[Abstract]:The opening of "three public funds" is a statutory obligation of the government, a requirement for the central link of the rule of law, an important condition for the realization of citizens' right to know and the normal operation of democratic politics, and a starting point for building a clean and honest government and anti-corruption. In recent years, the party and the government continue to emphasize the openness of the "three public" funds, and all departments of the central government and local governments at all levels carry out this requirement to varying degrees, making the "three public" funds open as one of the core contents of the government information disclosure. The people's Government of Wuhan has actively opened up special plates on its portal website to open the "three public" funds of various government departments. In this paper, 42 departments of Wuhan municipal administration were selected to study and analyze 101 public texts of "three public" funds, from 2010 to 2013. According to the international general data open standard, content analysis on the integrated use of literature research and descriptive statistical analysis method on completeness and text specific, timeliness, convenience, easy to carry on the analysis, the analysis results showed that on the whole, "three" by the quality cost public report is increased year by year. However, there is still a gap from the international standard. The main contents are: the content is simple, the degree of refinement is not enough, the cross examination is hard to achieve, and the public can see that it is not easy to be understood. This study mainly includes five parts. The first part is the introduction, mainly the research background and significance, the domestic and foreign research status, research methods. The second part is the summary of theory and method, mainly to clarify the meaning of "three public" funds, and to understand the theoretical basis and content analysis method of "three public funds". The third part is based on specific content analysis on the research and design of simple introduction, combined with the norms established and systematic analysis of the standard of "the three public funds released by the international general text data, which is a fundamental part of the empirical analysis. The fourth part is the empirical research and analysis. Through the longitudinal comparison of the time dimension and the comparison of the horizontal dimension departments, we analyze the integrity, concreteness, timeliness, convenience and comprehensibility of the three public funds, so as to find some rules or problems. The last part is on the basis of the above analysis and make the corresponding conclusion, and analyze the reason of bold according to the analysis results, we put forward corresponding measures: improving the relevant laws and regulations, to guide the "three public funding; emancipate the mind, pay attention to" public supervision and three funds; formation mechanism, guarantee "three public funds standardized. The main innovation of this paper: on the one hand, the GDDS (GDDS) compared with China's information disclosure text, construction of data quality analysis indicators, and as for the main part of the paper analysis framework; on the other hand, using the method of content analysis, and scientific and systematic and descriptive statistical method the quality of text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630.9;F812.45

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 劉新成;;“三公經(jīng)費”公開怎么服眾?[J];北京觀察;2011年08期

2 屈生富;;“三公”經(jīng)費信息公開機(jī)制構(gòu)建[J];財會通訊;2012年08期

3 馬圣一;;從三公經(jīng)費出發(fā)研究“行政監(jiān)督”[J];中國外資;2012年04期

4 嚴(yán)羽;;“三公消費”當(dāng)狠剎[J];政府法制;2006年10期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 周繼堅;[N];光明日報;2013年

2 高凌;[N];民主與法制時報;2011年

3 CUBN記者 李正強;[N];中國聯(lián)合商報;2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李春閣;政府信息公開的動力機(jī)制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李亮;論科學(xué)發(fā)展觀視野下的善治理念[D];東北財經(jīng)大學(xué);2007年

2 張月;我國“三公”經(jīng)費公開制度研究[D];中南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1345340