【摘要】：工業(yè)園區(qū)，特別是國家級(jí)工業(yè)園，是地方經(jīng)濟(jì)的核心，肩負(fù)著地方經(jīng)濟(jì)振興、崛起的重大使命。江西省國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展迅速，從2009年僅有兩個(gè)到截至2012年底全省共有十一個(gè)，三年內(nèi)新升級(jí)九個(gè)工業(yè)園區(qū)，表明了江西省委省政府對(duì)工業(yè)園區(qū)建設(shè)與發(fā)展的重視，同時(shí)體現(xiàn)了國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)在江西省經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)中的重要地位。 國內(nèi)外對(duì)工業(yè)園區(qū)的研究涉及很多方面：土地集約利用評(píng)價(jià)、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)評(píng)價(jià)、科技創(chuàng)新能力評(píng)價(jià)、競爭力評(píng)價(jià)等，研究方法多種多樣：AHP-模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法、人工神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)評(píng)價(jià)法、灰色綜合評(píng)價(jià)法等等。本論文以江西省國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)為研究對(duì)象，對(duì)其進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)價(jià)排名研究。工業(yè)園區(qū)綜合評(píng)價(jià)是一個(gè)綜合性的系統(tǒng)工程，不僅需要構(gòu)建一套全面合理的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系，而且還要選用合適的評(píng)價(jià)方法，定量與定性分析相結(jié)合，體現(xiàn)客觀性、科學(xué)性與合理性。本論文參照各類評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系，結(jié)合江西省國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)自身發(fā)展特點(diǎn)，建立了一個(gè)包含四大模塊，即經(jīng)濟(jì)效益、資源利用效率、發(fā)展?jié)摿吧鷳B(tài)效益，且包含30個(gè)三級(jí)指標(biāo)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。并采集江西省中小企業(yè)局2012年工業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展報(bào)告最新數(shù)據(jù)，參考2011年江西省工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)年鑒、中國投資指南等對(duì)指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)提取、篩選并處理。同時(shí)，選擇具有互補(bǔ)功能的數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析方法與層次分析法的模型組合，克服一般DEA方法對(duì)權(quán)重選擇的缺點(diǎn)，，又彌補(bǔ)專家打分過分主觀的不足，綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果更具有實(shí)際意義。對(duì)于評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果分析，本論文還結(jié)合中部地區(qū)國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果，對(duì)比分析了江西省工業(yè)園區(qū)在中部地區(qū)國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展中的地位，為江西省國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)現(xiàn)不足提供了參考。此外，結(jié)合江西省區(qū)域特色優(yōu)勢，提出了針對(duì)江西省國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展的幾點(diǎn)建議，包括集群式發(fā)展、融資創(chuàng)新、提高土地利用率、建設(shè)生態(tài)園區(qū)、加強(qiáng)對(duì)外交流等。 本論文研究在新一輪國家級(jí)工業(yè)園區(qū)入選名單公布伊始進(jìn)行，顯示出理論指導(dǎo)與時(shí)俱進(jìn)的積極作用，同時(shí)，綜合評(píng)價(jià)體系的建立無形中構(gòu)建了江西省工業(yè)園區(qū)綜合競爭力評(píng)價(jià)平臺(tái)，為江西省考察工業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀提供有效的評(píng)價(jià)機(jī)制，為園區(qū)健康、可持續(xù)發(fā)展提供保障。綜合評(píng)價(jià)研究同時(shí)為政府和企業(yè)發(fā)現(xiàn)問題、解決問題提供了有力的決策依據(jù)，為園區(qū)保持核心競爭力提供了理論支撐。
[Abstract]:Industrial parks, especially national industrial parks, are the core of local economy and shoulder the important mission of revitalizing and rising local economy. Jiangxi Province's national industrial parks have developed rapidly, from only two in 2009 to 11 in the province by the end of 2012. Within three years, nine new industrial parks have been upgraded, indicating that the Jiangxi Provincial Party Committee and the provincial government attach importance to the construction and development of the industrial parks. At the same time, it embodies the important position of the national industrial park in the economic construction of Jiangxi Province. The research on industrial parks at home and abroad involves many aspects: evaluation of intensive land use, evaluation of infrastructure construction, evaluation of scientific and technological innovation capacity, evaluation of competitiveness, and so on. The research methods are varied: AHP- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Artificial neural network evaluation method, grey comprehensive evaluation method and so on. This paper takes Jiangxi province national industrial park as the research object, carries on the comprehensive evaluation ranking research to it. The comprehensive evaluation of industrial park is a comprehensive system engineering. It is necessary not only to construct a set of comprehensive and reasonable evaluation index system, but also to choose the appropriate evaluation method, combine quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, and reflect the objectivity. Scientific and rational. Referring to all kinds of evaluation index system and combining with the development characteristics of Jiangxi National Industrial Park, this paper sets up a four modules, namely economic benefit, resource utilization efficiency, development potential and ecological benefit, which include economic benefit, resource utilization efficiency, development potential and ecological benefit. And the comprehensive evaluation index system which contains 30 three-level indexes. And collect the latest data of the industrial park development report of Jiangxi Provincial small and medium Enterprises Bureau in 2012, refer to the industrial economic yearbook of Jiangxi Province in 2011, China Investment Guide and so on to extract, select and process the index data. At the same time, the model combination of data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with complementary functions is chosen to overcome the shortcomings of general DEA method in weight selection, and to make up for the deficiency of excessive subjective evaluation of experts, so the comprehensive evaluation results have more practical significance. For the analysis of the evaluation results, this paper also compares and analyzes the status of Jiangxi Province Industrial Park in the development of the national industrial park in the central region, combining with the evaluation results of the national industrial park in the central region. It provides a reference for the national industrial park of Jiangxi Province. In addition, according to the regional characteristics of Jiangxi Province, some suggestions are put forward for the development of Jiangxi National Industrial Park, including cluster development, financing innovation, improvement of land utilization rate, construction of ecological park, strengthening of foreign exchange, and so on. This study is carried out at the beginning of the new round of national industrial park list publication, showing the positive role of theoretical guidance to keep pace with the times, at the same time, In order to provide effective evaluation mechanism and guarantee for the healthy and sustainable development of the industrial park in Jiangxi province, the comprehensive competitive power evaluation platform of Jiangxi industrial park has been built inconspicuously in order to investigate the present situation of the industrial park development in Jiangxi province. The comprehensive evaluation provides a powerful decision-making basis for the government and enterprises to find and solve problems at the same time, and provides a theoretical support for maintaining the core competitiveness of the park.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F427

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡寧,吳結(jié)兵;企業(yè)集群的競爭優(yōu)勢:資源的結(jié)構(gòu)性整合[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年07期

2 曹麗莉;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)的比較研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年08期

3 張仁壽,邵國良,夏明會(huì);工業(yè)園區(qū)績效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系及其評(píng)價(jià)方法的實(shí)證研究[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年11期

4 曹休寧;戴振;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚環(huán)境中的企業(yè)合作創(chuàng)新行為分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2009年08期

5 高玫;;國外工業(yè)園區(qū)建設(shè)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對(duì)江西的啟示[J];科技廣場;2008年04期

6 曹路寶;胡漢輝;陳金丹;;基于U-I關(guān)系的高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2011年05期

7 蔡寧,吳結(jié)兵;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的網(wǎng)絡(luò)式創(chuàng)新能力及其集體學(xué)習(xí)機(jī)制[J];科研管理;2005年04期

8 雷明;鐘書華;;國外生態(tài)工業(yè)園區(qū)評(píng)價(jià)研究述評(píng)[J];科研管理;2010年02期

9 李必亞;;江西工業(yè)園區(qū)考核評(píng)價(jià)體系的建立及評(píng)價(jià)[J];江西建材;2010年03期

10 郭敏燕;;江西省工業(yè)園區(qū)中小企業(yè)融資問題初探[J];江西金融職工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年S1期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 池友法;上海市工業(yè)園區(qū)土地集約利用與管理研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2011年

2 李小鵬;基于循環(huán)經(jīng)濟(jì)的生態(tài)工業(yè)園區(qū)綜合評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年

3 張麗娜;AHP-模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法在生態(tài)工業(yè)園區(qū)評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[D];大連理工大學(xué);2006年

4 江偉斌;提升江西工業(yè)園區(qū)核心競爭力研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2008年

5 劉嘯;中日產(chǎn)業(yè)園區(qū)發(fā)展模式比較[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

6 周丹丹;城市土地利用績效評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2438846