發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-29 11:36

【摘要】：進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)以后,隨著企業(yè)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的加劇,技術(shù)創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)的復(fù)雜性和重要性同時(shí)凸顯,創(chuàng)新成為企業(yè)贏得競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的關(guān)鍵,同時(shí)企業(yè)為提升創(chuàng)新績(jī)效不斷加大人力、物力、財(cái)力的投入。如何提高企業(yè)研發(fā)投入的利用效率,增加研發(fā)投入能否顯著提高企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效成為國(guó)內(nèi)外企業(yè)關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。企業(yè)內(nèi)部創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)由參與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)的研發(fā)人員構(gòu)成,影響通過(guò)企業(yè)內(nèi)部知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移與共享而對(duì)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)生影響。本文以企業(yè)內(nèi)部創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)屬性為視角探討研發(fā)投入對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效產(chǎn)生差異影響的原因,對(duì)提高企業(yè)研發(fā)投入利用率,提升企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效具有深遠(yuǎn)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文以技術(shù)創(chuàng)新理論和知識(shí)管理理論為依據(jù),總結(jié)了技術(shù)創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)的本質(zhì)內(nèi)涵及網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移的影響,引入社會(huì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析法研究研發(fā)團(tuán)隊(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)研發(fā)投入與創(chuàng)新績(jī)效調(diào)節(jié)作用。在梳理國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上界定了研發(fā)團(tuán)隊(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)的概念,將其劃分為網(wǎng)絡(luò)密度、網(wǎng)絡(luò)中心勢(shì)、E-I指數(shù)三個(gè)維度,從知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移角度分析了研發(fā)團(tuán)隊(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)密度三個(gè)維度對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的作用機(jī)理及其對(duì)研發(fā)投入與創(chuàng)新績(jī)效關(guān)系的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng),建立了以研發(fā)團(tuán)隊(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)為調(diào)節(jié)變量的研發(fā)投入對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的影響模型,同時(shí)提出相應(yīng)的研究假設(shè)。選取我國(guó)汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)157家上市公司為樣本進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,運(yùn)用描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)、相關(guān)性分析和多元回歸分析對(duì)樣本數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行假設(shè)檢驗(yàn)。研究表明：研發(fā)投入與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效顯著正相關(guān)；網(wǎng)絡(luò)密度、網(wǎng)絡(luò)中心勢(shì)對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效有顯著正向影響,且對(duì)研發(fā)投入與創(chuàng)新績(jī)效關(guān)系調(diào)節(jié)作用顯著；E-I指數(shù)負(fù)向調(diào)節(jié)研發(fā)投入與創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的關(guān)系,但對(duì)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的負(fù)向影響不顯著,這說(shuō)明E-I指數(shù)不是通過(guò)影響知識(shí)轉(zhuǎn)移而調(diào)節(jié)研發(fā)投入與創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的關(guān)系。根據(jù)研究結(jié)果,本文提出如下管理對(duì)策與建議：(1)增加研發(fā)人員投入是提高企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的基礎(chǔ)；(2)完善研發(fā)團(tuán)隊(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu),提高研發(fā)投入利用率。企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的提高是一個(gè)系統(tǒng)同程,在增加研發(fā)投入的同時(shí),加強(qiáng)企業(yè)內(nèi)部網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)建設(shè),充分發(fā)揮研發(fā)團(tuán)隊(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)在研發(fā)投入對(duì)提升企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效過(guò)程中的作用。期望本文的分析與探討能進(jìn)一步充實(shí)研發(fā)投入與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效關(guān)系的研究,為企業(yè)的管理實(shí)踐帶來(lái)一定的指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:After entering the 21st century, with the aggravation of the competition in the enterprise market, the complexity and importance of the technological innovation activities are highlighted at the same time, innovation becomes the key for the enterprise to win the competitive advantage, at the same time, the enterprise increases the manpower and material resources in order to promote the innovation performance. Financial investment How to improve the efficiency of R & D investment and whether it can significantly improve the innovation performance has become the focus of domestic and foreign enterprises. Intra-enterprise innovation network is composed of R & D personnel involved in technological innovation activities, which has an impact on technological innovation through knowledge transfer and sharing within enterprises. This paper discusses the causes of the difference between R & D investment and enterprise innovation performance from the perspective of the attribute of internal innovation network structure. It has far-reaching practical significance to improve the utilization rate of enterprise R & D investment and enhance enterprise innovation performance. Based on the theory of technological innovation and knowledge management, this paper summarizes the essence of technological innovation and the influence of network structure on knowledge transfer. Social network analysis was introduced to study the regulatory effect of R & D team network structure on R & D investment and innovation performance. This paper defines the concept of network structure of R & D team on the basis of combing related literature at home and abroad, and divides it into three dimensions: network density, network center potential and E-I index. From the perspective of knowledge transfer, this paper analyzes the mechanism of the three dimensions of R & D team network density on enterprise innovation performance and its regulatory effect on the relationship between R & D investment and innovation performance. In this paper, a model of the influence of R & D investment on enterprise innovation performance is established, which takes R & D team network structure as the adjusting variable, and the corresponding research hypothesis is put forward at the same time. In this paper, 157 listed companies in China's automobile industry are selected for empirical research, and the sample data are tested by descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and multivariate regression analysis. The results show that R & D investment has a significant positive correlation with enterprise innovation performance, network density and network center potential have a significant positive impact on enterprise innovation performance, and the relationship between R & D investment and innovation performance is significantly regulated. E-I index negatively regulates the relationship between R & D investment and innovation performance, but the negative impact on innovation performance is not significant, which indicates that E-I index does not regulate the relationship between R & D investment and innovation performance by influencing knowledge transfer. According to the research results, this paper puts forward the following management countermeasures and suggestions: (1) increasing R & D personnel input is the basis of improving enterprise innovation performance; (2) perfecting the network structure of R & D team and improving R D investment utilization ratio. The improvement of enterprise innovation performance is a systematic process. In addition to increasing R & D investment, we should strengthen the construction of internal network structure and give full play to the role of R & D team network structure in the process of R & D investment in the process of improving enterprise innovation performance. It is expected that the analysis and discussion in this paper can further enrich the research on the relationship between R & D investment and enterprise innovation performance, and bring some guiding significance to the management practice of enterprises.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F273.1;F426.471

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 趙榮;公司治理對(duì)公司績(jī)效的作用機(jī)制分析[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

2 姬超;杜英;楊麗麗;;不同類(lèi)型組織R&D行為與績(jī)效差異分析[J];徐州工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

3 卓萍;;基于SSP范式的公共組織績(jī)效差異研究[J];廈門(mén)理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

4 黃靜;屠梅曾;;股改前后上市公司股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)與公司績(jī)效關(guān)系分析[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

5 劉榮利;王浩;邢銘;;交通優(yōu)勢(shì)與河南區(qū)域發(fā)展績(jī)效差異[J];鐵道運(yùn)輸與經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年08期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前4條

1 陳冬華;齊祥芹;;地區(qū)制度環(huán)境與部分民營(yíng)化績(jī)效——來(lái)自我國(guó)上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[A];當(dāng)代會(huì)計(jì)評(píng)論（第3卷第1期）[C];2011年

2 張玉臣;朱金燕;;不同技術(shù)領(lǐng)域高新技術(shù)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效比較研究——基于上海市高新技術(shù)企業(yè)的實(shí)證研究[A];第九屆中國(guó)軟科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（上冊(cè)）[C];2013年

3 官建成;陳凱華;;中國(guó)省域研發(fā)生產(chǎn)前沿績(jī)效的測(cè)度框架——基于SBM-DEA/RD-Malmquist的實(shí)證分析[A];第六屆中國(guó)科技政策與管理學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

4 伍鳳蘭;;農(nóng)村合作醫(yī)療制度績(jī)效的比較研究[A];2008年中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)特區(qū)論壇：紀(jì)念改革開(kāi)放30周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 記者 鄭明;地區(qū)召開(kāi)2014年績(jī)效考評(píng)推進(jìn)會(huì)[N];阿勒泰日?qǐng)?bào)(漢);2014年

2 李國(guó)正;三季度:整體業(yè)績(jī)下滑小 行業(yè)績(jī)效差異大[N];上海證券報(bào);2005年

3 趙文榮;經(jīng)濟(jì)變遷過(guò)程：知其然能否知其所以然[N];中華讀書(shū)報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 李國(guó)良;中國(guó)建筑企業(yè)多元化與績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

2 周敏;央地分權(quán)以及相對(duì)績(jī)效評(píng)估下的區(qū)域競(jìng)爭(zhēng)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

3 張力;孵化器績(jī)效差異的內(nèi)在機(jī)理研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2010年

4 林浚清;中國(guó)上市公司高管績(jī)效激勵(lì)研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2005年

5 馮恂;中國(guó)證券投資基金績(jī)效成因研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

6 王東清;企業(yè)IT能力及其績(jī)效貢獻(xiàn)的理論與實(shí)證研究[D];中南大學(xué);2008年

7 鄭素麗;組織間資源對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的作用機(jī)制研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 滕廣升;企業(yè)員工三維度績(jī)效考核模型研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 張彬琳;我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)整合的動(dòng)因、趨勢(shì)和績(jī)效研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

3 姜英英;北京市政府績(jī)效評(píng)估研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2015年

4 朱衛(wèi)杰;云創(chuàng)新模式下不同創(chuàng)新平臺(tái)的績(jī)效差異及其影響因素研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2014年

5 蔡文政;基于組織公平的NY高校輔導(dǎo)員身份差異與工作績(jī)效調(diào)查研究[D];南京郵電大學(xué);2015年

6 帥江娜;零售企業(yè)跨區(qū)域進(jìn)入動(dòng)機(jī)對(duì)進(jìn)入模式及成長(zhǎng)績(jī)效的影響研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

7 王梅;藝術(shù)品投資對(duì)資產(chǎn)組合績(jī)效的影響研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2016年

8 張朋朋;上市公司高管薪酬與企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任績(jī)效相關(guān)性研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2016年

9 郭再奎;基層警察工作滿(mǎn)意度與工作績(jī)效自我感知的影響研究[D];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

10 蘇蕊蕊;研發(fā)投入和研發(fā)團(tuán)隊(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)汽車(chē)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績(jī)效的實(shí)證研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2211081