本文選題：化工行業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：綠色績(jī)效　出處：《武漢理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：從二十世紀(jì)八十年代以來(lái),我國(guó)化工行業(yè)得到了迅猛發(fā)展并取得了輝煌的成就,而今已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要支柱之一�？闪钊藫�(dān)憂的是,當(dāng)前我國(guó)化工行業(yè)呈現(xiàn)出“三廢”排放量大,能源利用率低,環(huán)境污染嚴(yán)重等嚴(yán)峻的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀。雖然從2006年以來(lái),我國(guó)出臺(tái)了一系列關(guān)于節(jié)能減排和安全生產(chǎn)方面的法律法規(guī),在節(jié)約能源、減少污染排放方面獲得了令人矚目的效果,化工行業(yè)也在這方面有所改進(jìn),可環(huán)境、能源和安全生產(chǎn)問(wèn)題依然是化工企業(yè)所必須要面對(duì)的三大問(wèn)題。其重視程度不僅體現(xiàn)在事前的嚴(yán)密規(guī)劃與事中的嚴(yán)格監(jiān)督,還體現(xiàn)在事后對(duì)企業(yè)績(jī)效客觀、全面的評(píng)價(jià),這意味著在績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)時(shí)除了要關(guān)注企業(yè)的財(cái)務(wù)表現(xiàn),還要考慮在能耗降低、污染減少、安全生產(chǎn)等方面的成效。而現(xiàn)在盛行的企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系已經(jīng)完全不能滿足我國(guó)化工行業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求,該企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系重經(jīng)濟(jì)績(jī)效,輕環(huán)境績(jī)效、社會(huì)績(jī)效,這樣只會(huì)導(dǎo)致企業(yè)管理者一味追求企業(yè)內(nèi)部經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的最大化,而不注重環(huán)境效益和社會(huì)效益的提高。所以,在深入研究我國(guó)化工行業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建適合化工行業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)特點(diǎn)的績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系,對(duì)引導(dǎo)化工行業(yè)減少環(huán)境污染,保護(hù)生態(tài)環(huán)境,實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)健康、持續(xù)發(fā)展,具有重要意義。 本文采用規(guī)范研究與實(shí)證研究相結(jié)合的方法對(duì)化工行業(yè)綠色績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行了研究。從企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的相關(guān)概念及理論基礎(chǔ)入手,在深入分析化工行業(yè)的特征及其績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)商,針對(duì)其績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)的不足,結(jié)合化工行業(yè)生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)特點(diǎn)構(gòu)建了一套綜合考慮化工行業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益與環(huán)境效益的綠色績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系,并運(yùn)用DEA法對(duì)2012年我國(guó)19家化工市公司進(jìn)行了綠色績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià),通過(guò)松弛變量的分析找到了可以進(jìn)行改進(jìn)的方向,最后得出以下結(jié)論：第一,我國(guó)化工行業(yè)綠色績(jī)效水平不高,行業(yè)內(nèi)綠色績(jī)效水平差異較大。第二,化工行業(yè)內(nèi)存在著純技術(shù)效率與規(guī)模效率同時(shí)無(wú)效的企業(yè)。第三,化工行業(yè)仍存在盲目擴(kuò)大生產(chǎn)的現(xiàn)象。 本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)：第一,歸納總結(jié)了綠色績(jī)效的內(nèi)涵,提出了綠色績(jī)效主要包括經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和環(huán)境效益,綠色績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)就是把環(huán)境因素納入到績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系中,綜合評(píng)價(jià)企業(yè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和環(huán)境效益。第二,從投入和產(chǎn)出角度,建立了化工行業(yè)綠色績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,并結(jié)合DEA法來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)化工行業(yè)的綠色績(jī)效。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980s, China's chemical industry has developed rapidly and made brilliant achievements. Now it has become one of the important pillars of China's economic development. At present, the chemical industry of our country presents a severe development situation of "three wastes" emissions, low energy utilization rate, serious environmental pollution and so on. Although since 2006, China has issued a series of laws and regulations on energy saving and emission reduction and production safety. In saving energy, reducing pollution emissions has achieved remarkable results, the chemical industry has also improved in this respect, but the environment, Energy and production safety are still three major problems that chemical enterprises must face. The degree of attention is not only reflected in strict planning and strict supervision, but also in the objective and comprehensive evaluation of enterprise performance after the event. This means that when evaluating performance, in addition to paying attention to the financial performance of the enterprise, it is also necessary to consider reducing energy consumption and pollution. However, the prevailing enterprise performance evaluation system can no longer meet the actual needs of China's chemical industry performance evaluation. The enterprise performance evaluation system emphasizes economic performance, not environmental performance, social performance, and so on. This will only lead the managers of enterprises to blindly pursue the maximization of the internal economic benefits of enterprises, but not to the improvement of environmental and social benefits. Therefore, on the basis of in-depth study of the current situation of performance evaluation of chemical industry in China, It is of great significance to construct a performance evaluation system suitable for the development of chemical industry and the characteristics of production and management. It is of great significance to guide the chemical industry to reduce environmental pollution, protect the ecological environment, achieve healthy economic and social development and sustainable development. In this paper, the green performance evaluation of chemical industry is studied by combining normative research with empirical research. In the deep analysis of the characteristics of the chemical industry and the current situation of performance evaluation of the quotient, in view of its performance evaluation of the shortcomings, Based on the characteristics of chemical industry production and management, a green performance evaluation system considering the economic and environmental benefits of chemical industry is established, and the green performance evaluation of 19 chemical companies in China in 2012 is carried out by using DEA method. Through the analysis of relaxation variables, we find the direction of improvement, and finally draw the following conclusions: first, the green performance level of chemical industry in China is not high, the difference of green performance level in industry is great. Second, In the chemical industry, there are enterprises with both technical efficiency and scale efficiency that are not effective at the same time. Thirdly, the chemical industry still has the phenomenon of blindly expanding production. The innovations of this paper are as follows: first, the connotation of green performance is summarized, and the green performance includes economic and environmental benefits. Green performance evaluation is to incorporate environmental factors into the performance evaluation system. Secondly, the green performance evaluation index system of chemical industry is established from the point of view of input and output, and the green performance of chemical industry is evaluated by DEA method.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F424.1;F426.722

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫蓮;;企業(yè)綠色績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系[J];安徽科技;2006年04期

2 袁男優(yōu);;低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)的概念內(nèi)涵[J];城市環(huán)境與城市生態(tài);2010年01期

3 鄭杰陽(yáng);徐惠珍;;基于DEA的環(huán)保企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系構(gòu)建[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2010年29期

4 王化成,劉俊勇;企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)模式研究——兼論中國(guó)企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)模式選擇[J];管理世界;2004年04期

5 李冬妍;黃韻;;基于EVA的國(guó)有企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)比較研究[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

6 梅海紅;趙向琴;洪燕平;;基于EVA的企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)研究——以我國(guó)煤炭上市公司為例[J];黑龍江科技信息;2011年12期

7 溫素彬;薛恒新;;基于科學(xué)發(fā)展觀的企業(yè)三重績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)模型[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2005年04期

8 溫素彬;黃浩嵐;;利益相關(guān)者價(jià)值取向的企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)——績(jī)效三棱鏡的應(yīng)用案例[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2009年04期

9 溫素彬;;企業(yè)三重績(jī)效的層次變權(quán)綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型——基于可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的視角[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2010年12期

10 何平林;石亞?wèn)|;李濤;;環(huán)境績(jī)效的數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析方法——一項(xiàng)基于我國(guó)火力發(fā)電廠的案例研究[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2012年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1678710