本文關(guān)鍵詞： 風(fēng)電行業(yè) 可再生能源 購電法 招標(biāo)制 配額制　出處：《華東理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文主要對我國風(fēng)能發(fā)電行業(yè)的政策工具選擇進(jìn)行研究,在招標(biāo)制、購電法和配額制這三種主要的政策工具中,根據(jù)我國現(xiàn)有的風(fēng)電行業(yè)的發(fā)展?fàn)顟B(tài)以及國情進(jìn)行抉擇。本文的研究工作主要遵循情境方法的研究框架,以風(fēng)電技術(shù)和我國國情為情境,在三種政策中找出一種最適合我國風(fēng)電情境的主導(dǎo)性政策。這里應(yīng)用的適合性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)是備選政策對特定情境的一種契合性,即考察備選政策在特定的情境中是否能夠運行良好,并且以合理的成本實現(xiàn)既定的風(fēng)電利用目標(biāo)。文章的第四章則是進(jìn)行我國風(fēng)電行業(yè)發(fā)展的適合性政策的具體分析,其中包括三個部分；第一部分是招標(biāo)制的適用性,這里針對目前的研究文獻(xiàn)對招標(biāo)制的抨擊進(jìn)行評價,借用了經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理和經(jīng)驗證據(jù)分析,表明了反對觀點夸大了招標(biāo)制低價的危害,并且引入了招投標(biāo)的博弈模型分析和兩階段的伯川德競爭模型對招標(biāo)制的競標(biāo)價格進(jìn)行了解釋；第二部分則是考察在現(xiàn)實的約束下,三種政策工具的相對合意性,通過效果成本理想情形的完全等價性,在這之中分別引入分階段實施、技術(shù)進(jìn)步以及政策本身的運行約束限定條件后,比較購買成本,得出招標(biāo)制購買成本最低；第三部分基于一個風(fēng)電政策決策概念模型,對招標(biāo)制、購電法和配額制三種主導(dǎo)性政策的選擇進(jìn)行分析,得出目前最適合中國發(fā)展風(fēng)能行業(yè)的政策工具。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the main policy tool for wind power industry in China were studied, in the bidding system, the purchase method and the quota system of the three main policy tools, make choices based on the development of China's wind power industry and the existing situation. The research framework of the research work of this paper mainly follow the situational approach, with wind power technology and China's national conditions for the situation, find the most suitable wind power situation in China in the three leading policy policy. Here the application of suitability criteria is a fit of the alternative policy on the specific situation, that is to investigate whether alternative policies can run well in the specific situation, and implementation of wind power the goal at a reasonable cost. The fourth chapter is a detailed analysis of China's wind power industry development for the policy, including three parts; the first part is the applicability of the bidding system, Here according to the current research literature on bidding system attack evaluation, analysis from the economics principle and empirical evidence that opposition has exaggerated the risks bidding system low, and the introduction of the bidding price Bertrand competition model of bidding game model and the two stage of the bidding system are explained; second the part is to examine the reality under the constraints of the relative desirability of three kinds of policy tools, through the complete equivalence of cost effect ideal situation, introduced respectively implemented in phases in this operation, the progress of technology and the constraints of the policy itself limited conditions, compared to the purchase cost, purchase cost is the lowest tender for the third part; a decision model based on the concept of wind power policy, the bidding system, the purchase method and the quota system of three dominant policy choice analysis, obtained the most suitable for the development of China A policy tool for the wind industry.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F426.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 時t熇，

本文編號：1553417