本文選題：品牌來(lái)源國(guó) + 品牌感知��； 參考：《桂林電子科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：“假洋品牌”和“山寨”貼“標(biāo)簽”現(xiàn)象媒體曝光后并沒(méi)有得到遏制,反而在我國(guó)各行各業(yè)中泛濫成災(zāi),其現(xiàn)象的本質(zhì)是消費(fèi)者對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口品牌感知的差異,屬于原產(chǎn)地研究中品牌來(lái)源國(guó)效應(yīng)的研究范疇。隨著國(guó)際分工越來(lái)越細(xì)化和明確,產(chǎn)品制造國(guó)的概念逐漸多維化,且產(chǎn)品制造國(guó)效應(yīng)對(duì)消費(fèi)者的影響力在逐步減弱,而品牌來(lái)源國(guó)的影響正逐步增強(qiáng),其所激發(fā)的情感和聯(lián)想凸顯出更重要價(jià)值。目前大多數(shù)原產(chǎn)地的研究的重點(diǎn)是來(lái)源國(guó),而忽略了品牌的概念。中國(guó)作為新興經(jīng)濟(jì)體其本土消費(fèi)者比發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的消費(fèi)者更加重視品牌。品牌來(lái)源國(guó)已經(jīng)成為消費(fèi)者認(rèn)識(shí)和評(píng)價(jià)產(chǎn)品的一種更有效的工具。因此,關(guān)于品牌來(lái)源國(guó)的中國(guó)本土化研究更具有實(shí)際價(jià)值�；诖�,本文的研究重點(diǎn)就是揭示品牌“洋”名化現(xiàn)象背后的本質(zhì),以及消費(fèi)者對(duì)于國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口品牌感知存在何種差異,旨在發(fā)現(xiàn)其背后的共性特征。本文在系統(tǒng)梳理相關(guān)研究的基礎(chǔ)上,找尋現(xiàn)象背后的實(shí)質(zhì)問(wèn)題,詳細(xì)的梳理理論邏輯線條,切合目前國(guó)內(nèi)商品發(fā)展脈搏,以真實(shí)的品牌集進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,探尋現(xiàn)象背后消費(fèi)者完整的品牌來(lái)源國(guó)感知模式,以及消費(fèi)者對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口品牌的感知差異和影響機(jī)制。本文在文獻(xiàn)梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,以刻板印象理論為基礎(chǔ),基于以品牌意圖能動(dòng)框架理論延伸的品牌感知的能力、道德和親切三維度模型,引入以人際吸引理論和相互依賴?yán)碚摓榛A(chǔ)構(gòu)建的品牌關(guān)系質(zhì)量的象征價(jià)值、信任承諾、相互依賴和親密情感四維度模型作為中介變量,構(gòu)建了消費(fèi)者品牌感知概念模型。同時(shí),為了進(jìn)一步探尋消費(fèi)者品牌評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)對(duì)品牌感知及選擇的影響,構(gòu)建了包含技術(shù)、聲望、工藝、物有所值、質(zhì)量和售后服務(wù)等六項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的品牌評(píng)價(jià)量表。為了研究的準(zhǔn)確性和結(jié)論的可靠性,本文通過(guò)網(wǎng)上調(diào)研收集了關(guān)于消費(fèi)者對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口手機(jī)品牌集兩個(gè)調(diào)查樣本,并運(yùn)用AMOS結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型進(jìn)行了相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)分析,得出結(jié)論:消費(fèi)者對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口品牌感知存在明顯差異,國(guó)產(chǎn)品牌的道德感知影響程度最大,進(jìn)口品牌的親切感知影響程度最大,而國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口品牌的能力感知均起到最小作用,且國(guó)產(chǎn)品牌能力感知起到負(fù)向影響;品牌關(guān)系質(zhì)量在國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口品牌感知概念模型中均起到部分中介作用,但對(duì)于進(jìn)口品牌感知中品牌關(guān)系質(zhì)量的信任承諾維度起到完全中介效應(yīng);品牌評(píng)價(jià)的技術(shù)和工藝指標(biāo)對(duì)國(guó)產(chǎn)品牌感知和選擇均起到顯著負(fù)向作用,而售后服務(wù)指標(biāo)對(duì)進(jìn)口品牌感知和選擇影響均不顯著�；谘芯拷Y(jié)論,文章系統(tǒng)梳理出中國(guó)本土消費(fèi)者原產(chǎn)地影響機(jī)制,并對(duì)企業(yè)和消費(fèi)者提出了雙重管理啟示,以期對(duì)企業(yè)實(shí)踐和消費(fèi)者購(gòu)物決策提供借鑒和指導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of "fake foreign brands" and "labels" has not been contained since the exposure of the media. Instead, it has been rampant in various industries in China. The essence of the phenomenon is the difference in consumer perception of domestic and imported brands. It belongs to the category of country of origin effect of brand. As the international division of labor becomes more and more detailed and clear, the concept of product manufacturing country is becoming multidimensional, and the influence of product manufacturing country effect on consumers is gradually weakening, while the influence of brand source country is gradually increasing. The emotions and associations it inspires highlight more important values. At present, most studies of origin focus on the source country, ignoring the concept of brand. As an emerging economy, China's local consumers value brands more than those in developed countries. Brand origin has become a more effective tool for consumers to recognize and evaluate products. Therefore, the study of Chinese localization of brand source country has more practical value. Based on this, the research focus of this paper is to reveal the essence behind the "foreign" brand nominalization phenomenon, and how consumers perceive the difference between domestic and imported brands, in order to find the common features behind it. On the basis of systematical combing of relevant research, this paper looks for the essential problems behind the phenomenon, combs the theoretical logic lines in detail, accords with the pulse of domestic commodity development, and carries on the empirical research with the real brand collection. Explore the consumer's complete brand source country perception model behind the phenomenon, as well as consumer perception of domestic and imported brand differences and influence mechanisms. On the basis of literature review, this paper is based on stereotype theory, the ability of brand perception extended by brand intention dynamic framework theory, moral and cordial three-dimensional model. This paper introduces the symbolic value of brand relationship quality based on interpersonal attraction theory and interdependence theory, trust commitment, interdependence and closeness as intermediary variables, and constructs a conceptual model of consumer brand perception. At the same time, in order to further explore the impact of consumer brand evaluation indicators on brand perception and choice, a brand evaluation scale including technology, reputation, technology, value for money, quality and after-sales service is constructed. In order to study the accuracy and reliability of the conclusion, this paper collects two samples about consumers' collection of domestic and imported mobile phone brands through online investigation, and uses the AMOS structural equation model to analyze the relevant data. It is concluded that there are obvious differences in consumer perception of domestic and imported brands, the degree of moral perception of domestic brands is the greatest, and the degree of affection of imported brands is the greatest. The ability perception of domestic and imported brands plays a minimum role, and the perception of domestic brand ability plays a negative role; the quality of brand relationship plays a part of intermediary role in the conceptual model of domestic and imported brand perception. However, the dimension of trust commitment of brand relationship quality in the perception of imported brands plays a complete intermediary effect, and the technical and technological indicators of brand evaluation play a significant negative role in the perception and selection of domestic brands. The influence of after-sales service index on the perception and selection of import brand is not significant. Based on the conclusion of the study, the paper systematically combs out the influence mechanism of the origin of China's local consumers, and puts forward the dual management enlightenment to enterprises and consumers, in order to provide reference and guidance for enterprises' practice and consumer's shopping decision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：桂林電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F713.55

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳波;李東進(jìn);杜立婷;;消費(fèi)者品牌感知研究——對(duì)品牌意圖能動(dòng)框架的延伸[J];管理評(píng)論;2015年02期

2 吳波;李東進(jìn);謝宗曉;;消費(fèi)者綠色產(chǎn)品偏好的影響因素研究[J];軟科學(xué);2014年12期

3 袁勝軍;符國(guó)群;;中國(guó)消費(fèi)者對(duì)同一品牌國(guó)產(chǎn)與進(jìn)口產(chǎn)品認(rèn)知差異的原因及分析[J];軟科學(xué);2012年06期

4 袁勝軍;符國(guó)群;;原產(chǎn)地形象對(duì)中國(guó)品牌國(guó)際化的啟示[J];軟科學(xué);2012年02期

5 王怡然;;口碑營(yíng)銷(xiāo)策略分析[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2011年01期

6 吳堅(jiān);符國(guó)群;丁嘉莉;;基于屬性水平的品牌來(lái)源國(guó)作用機(jī)制研究——信息處理的視角[J];管理評(píng)論;2010年03期

7 吳堅(jiān);符國(guó)群;;品牌來(lái)源國(guó)和產(chǎn)品制造國(guó)對(duì)消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買(mǎi)行為的影響[J];管理學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

8 周志民;;品牌關(guān)系研究述評(píng)[J];外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2007年04期

9 莊貴軍;周南;周連喜;;國(guó)貨意識(shí)、品牌特性與消費(fèi)者本土品牌偏好——一個(gè)跨行業(yè)產(chǎn)品的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];管理世界;2006年07期

10 何佳訊;;品牌關(guān)系質(zhì)量本土化模型的建立與驗(yàn)證[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊雙艷;品牌名稱與產(chǎn)品制造國(guó)對(duì)消費(fèi)者品牌感知的影響研究[D];東華大學(xué);2016年

2 劉暢;消費(fèi)者國(guó)產(chǎn)和進(jìn)口奢侈品行為意向研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2010年

3 謝曉燕;服裝品牌來(lái)源國(guó)與產(chǎn)品制造國(guó)對(duì)消費(fèi)者態(tài)度的影響[D];北京服裝學(xué)院;2010年

4 臣淑君;產(chǎn)品來(lái)源國(guó)對(duì)消費(fèi)行為的影響研究[D];東華大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1923852