發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-12 10:33

  本文選題：微妙決策 + 虛踐�。� 參考：《領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué)》2013年10期

【摘要】：正領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者在許多時(shí)候沒法摸清事物之間的微妙關(guān)系,卻不得不對(duì)其中的微妙問題做決策。在這種情況下做決策難免基于"猜想",這樣的決策就是"微妙決策"。由于我們并沒有把它作為一種相對(duì)獨(dú)立的決策類型來研究,所以,"微妙決策"對(duì)于我們來說乃是一種熟悉的"陌生",甚至把它等同于"經(jīng)驗(yàn)決策"。這種理論上的缺陷,把有些領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者帶進(jìn)了決策誤區(qū)。其實(shí),"微妙決策"是指在信息、心態(tài)與環(huán)境等因素難以捉摸的情況下所做出的決策,它的特質(zhì)是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者的自我博弈,與之相適應(yīng)的是"四階六問"的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)藝術(shù)。
[Abstract]:Positive leaders often can't figure out the subtle relationship between things, but they have to make decisions on the delicate issues.In this case, decisions are based on guesses, which are subtlety.Since we do not study it as a relatively independent decision type, "subtle decision" is a familiar "strange" to us, even equating it with "empirical decision".This theoretical flaw has led some leaders into erroneous decision-making.In fact, "subtle decision" refers to the decision made under the circumstances of information, mentality and environment, etc. Its characteristic is the self-game of the leader, and the leading art of "fourth order and sixth question" is corresponding to it.
【作者單位】： 浙江省臺(tái)州廣播電視大學(xué);
【分類號(hào)】：C933.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1739367