發(fā)布時間：2018-03-02 18:32

  本文選題：領(lǐng)導(dǎo)　切入點：執(zhí)行力　出處：《領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué)》2013年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正執(zhí)行力研究的邏輯起點就是突破了"政策一經(jīng)制定就會被完美執(zhí)行"的教條,開始關(guān)注目標與結(jié)果之間的差異,這種差異就是執(zhí)行力的病態(tài)表現(xiàn)。對執(zhí)行力病態(tài)表現(xiàn)的研究一直是學(xué)者們關(guān)注的課題。比如,武漢大學(xué)丁煌教授用"政策執(zhí)行阻滯"概念表述行政執(zhí)行的病態(tài)現(xiàn)象;國家行政學(xué)院徐珂研究員在《政府執(zhí)行力》一書中總結(jié)了地方政府執(zhí)行力的12種病態(tài)表現(xiàn)。這些病態(tài)現(xiàn)象的共同特點在于政策執(zhí)行的既定目標與執(zhí)行結(jié)果之間存在偏離。這里,筆者試圖從傳統(tǒng)文化視角分析當代中國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)執(zhí)行力偏離現(xiàn)象的原因。
[Abstract]:The logical starting point of positive execution research is to break through the dogma that "once a policy is formulated, it will be implemented perfectly," and begin to pay attention to the difference between goals and results. This kind of difference is the morbid expression of executive power. The study of executive power morbid performance has always been a topic of concern to scholars. For example, Professor Ding Huang of Wuhan University uses the concept of "policy execution block" to describe the morbid phenomenon of administrative execution. Researcher Xu Ke of Chinese Academy of Governance sums up 12 pathological manifestations of the executive power of local governments in his book "Government Executive Power." the common characteristic of these pathological phenomena lies in the deviation between the stated objectives of policy implementation and the results of implementation. The author tries to analyze the causes of the deviation of executive power in contemporary China from the perspective of traditional culture.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：C933
，

本文編號：1557679