本文選題：產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目 + 社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：建立創(chuàng)新型國家是我國未來十年發(fā)展的核心戰(zhàn)略。這決定了必須提高知識創(chuàng)新的效率和效益,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目是促使上述目標(biāo)實現(xiàn)的有效途徑之一。在我國產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目中,由于產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目是跨組織的項目,各組織之間很難建立起高效的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,這將導(dǎo)致資源無法有效協(xié)調(diào)和利用,造成產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目的失敗率較高,其結(jié)果勢必影響知識創(chuàng)新的速度和效果。上述問題已超出了項目管理的研究范疇,在這種情況下,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理則是解決問題更有效的途徑。因此,本文在對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素進(jìn)行實證分析的基礎(chǔ)上,采用仿真技術(shù)揭示項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)演變對治理風(fēng)險因素的演化規(guī)律,并以此提出管理策略和建議。這對于降低產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險,保證產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目成功具有重要意義。 本文從社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)演化的視角,對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險進(jìn)行研究,主要內(nèi)容分為以下三個部分： 第一部分,即論文第1章和第2章,對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行回顧,通過文獻(xiàn)評述,發(fā)現(xiàn)目前有關(guān)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險的研究,忽視了產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目“嵌入”社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)后,結(jié)構(gòu)演變所造成的治理風(fēng)險。基于以上分析,本文認(rèn)為產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目是基于信任關(guān)系,由企業(yè)、高等院�；蚩蒲袡C(jī)構(gòu)以及中介機(jī)構(gòu)為核心的眾多參與主體構(gòu)成的社會網(wǎng)絡(luò),其治理風(fēng)險主要來自產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)變化所引起的網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)風(fēng)險。因此,本文將研究問題界定為如何分析產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)風(fēng)險。該部分還對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目、項目治理以及社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)分析等相關(guān)研究進(jìn)行了梳理,為論文主體部分的研究提供理論支持。 第二部分,即論文的第3章,對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素進(jìn)行實證分析。本部分從產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作參與方、合作過程以及合作環(huán)境三個方面,對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素進(jìn)行了梳理,同時依據(jù)本文中產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理概念和已有研究成果對項目治理成功指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了提煉和界定,并依據(jù)上述結(jié)果進(jìn)行實驗設(shè)計。通過問卷調(diào)查方法和因子分析方法提取出產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素,并采用多元回歸分析法對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素與項目治理成功之間的相關(guān)性進(jìn)行了檢驗。該部分的研究結(jié)論既是對第一部分所提出的研究問題進(jìn)行的深入分析和科學(xué)論證,也是對第三部分研究內(nèi)容的明確和界定,具有承上啟下的作用。 第三部分,即論文的第4章、第5章和第6章,對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)風(fēng)險演化規(guī)律進(jìn)行分析。本部分通過對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素進(jìn)行理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用MATLAB軟件仿真并分析了項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)演變對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素的影響過程和作用機(jī)理。通過對結(jié)果的分析,揭示出項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)改變時,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素的演化規(guī)律,并依據(jù)上述演化規(guī)律制定出產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目管理策略和建議,為降低產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險,保證產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目成功提供了理論支持和實踐指導(dǎo)。 本文對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險展開研究,關(guān)注項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)演變對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素的影響,本文采用實證方法和仿真技術(shù)分析了上述影響過程,主要的研究結(jié)論如下： 1.產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險主要來自信任機(jī)制、知識擴(kuò)散過程、項目合作關(guān)系以及合作策略四個關(guān)鍵因素。 本文通過問卷調(diào)查方法對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素進(jìn)行了分析,研究表明,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素聚焦在信任機(jī)制、知識擴(kuò)散過程、合作關(guān)系以及項目合作策略四個關(guān)鍵因素上；同時,本文采用多元回歸分析法對信任機(jī)制因素、知識擴(kuò)散過程因素、合作關(guān)系因素以及項目合作策略因素與項目治理成功之間的相關(guān)性進(jìn)行了檢驗,從檢驗結(jié)果中可以看出,信任機(jī)制因素、合作關(guān)系因素和項目合作策略因素對微觀治理成功、宏觀治理成功以及項目治理成功產(chǎn)生正向影響；知識擴(kuò)散過程因子對微觀治理成功和項目治理成功產(chǎn)生正向影響,對宏觀治理成功的影響較弱。從上述研究結(jié)果中可以得出,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理成功不僅關(guān)注項目管理范疇,更加強(qiáng)調(diào)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理環(huán)境的構(gòu)建。 2.產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素中信任機(jī)制風(fēng)險,隨著產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)中個體關(guān)系屬性的改變而表現(xiàn)出非線性的演化規(guī)律。 從仿真結(jié)果中可以得出,減少政府對企業(yè)、高校和科研單位、中介機(jī)構(gòu)的直接行政干預(yù),保持項目各參與方相對獨(dú)立的運(yùn)作方式,更能增進(jìn)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目中各參與主體之間的信任狀態(tài)；隨著高校和科研單位影響力的增強(qiáng),產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目中各參與主體對政府的信任狀態(tài)能夠較迅速的達(dá)到穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。需要特別指出的是,雖然高校和科研單位影響力較大,但其自身的信任狀態(tài)并沒有發(fā)生較大改變。這說明了產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目中對“研”的信任更多的來自制度信任和過程信任,知名專家或者科研機(jī)構(gòu)并不能增強(qiáng)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目中各參與方之間的信任水平,也不能確保產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目目標(biāo)的實現(xiàn),而真正能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)項目價值的保證源于良好的項目治理環(huán)境；企業(yè)與高校和科研單位的目標(biāo)差異,使得其他產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目參與個體對上述兩個體的信任狀態(tài)產(chǎn)生了分歧。這表明,在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目中 一旦參與方之間對項目目標(biāo)或價值存在認(rèn)識和判斷上的分歧時,很容易造成產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目中多個群體的產(chǎn)生,這些群體內(nèi)部具有較高的信任狀態(tài),但群體間信任狀態(tài)較低,隨著目標(biāo)差異的逐漸增大,可能導(dǎo)致相同價值理念群體的退出。 3.產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目參與個體間的信任、擴(kuò)散意愿和影響力、以及擴(kuò)散者地位對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險中知識擴(kuò)散過程因素具有顯著影響。 從仿真結(jié)果中可以得出,在知識擴(kuò)散過程中,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目個體間信任、知識擴(kuò)散者意愿及其影響力均與知識擴(kuò)散平均速度之間具有正相關(guān)性。當(dāng)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目參與個體之間的信任程度和知識擴(kuò)散者意愿越強(qiáng),知識擴(kuò)散者影響力越大時,越有利于促進(jìn)項目參與個體間隱性知識的擴(kuò)散：初始知識擴(kuò)散者的位置對于知識擴(kuò)散數(shù)量和速度具有較大影響。在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目知識擴(kuò)散過程中,知識擴(kuò)散者越有可能成為產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目核心成員時,隱性知識被產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目參與個體接收的數(shù)量越大,同時,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目知識擴(kuò)散速度越快；當(dāng)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目知識水平達(dá)到一定規(guī)模以后,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目知識擴(kuò)散瞬時速度存在最大值,即存在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目知識水平的最優(yōu)擴(kuò)散規(guī)模。隨著產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目知識擴(kuò)散瞬時速度達(dá)到最大值后,瞬時擴(kuò)散速度開始下降,呈現(xiàn)出下降趨勢。這表明產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目需要協(xié)同、培訓(xùn)等技術(shù)手段,使產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目知識水平達(dá)到一定的閥值,才能實現(xiàn)隱性知識的高速擴(kuò)散,同時也表明,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目的邊界不利于項目外部隱性知識的吸收和利用。 4.產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險中的合作關(guān)系因素伴隨著合作策略因素的改變,在不同的項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)的復(fù)雜特征下表現(xiàn)出不同的動態(tài)演化規(guī)律。 在具有小世界特征的產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)中,隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)平均節(jié)點(diǎn)度的不斷增大,網(wǎng)絡(luò)平均路徑長度不斷減少,而聚集系數(shù)卻不斷增加,這說明隨著產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目參與個體之間合作關(guān)系數(shù)量的不斷增加,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目參與個體之間有形成內(nèi)部小團(tuán)體的趨勢,同時,平均路徑長度的降低,更有助于內(nèi)部溝通和知識擴(kuò)散的進(jìn)行,尤其是有利于隱性知識的傳播和擴(kuò)散；在采取不同的博弈策略時,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目合作關(guān)系表現(xiàn)出不同的變化規(guī)律,采取贏留輸變策略時效率較高,在此策略下,不斷增加項目參與個體之間的合作數(shù)量,可以促進(jìn)合作關(guān)系比例的增加；采取以牙還牙策略時效率也較高,但在此策略下,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目合作關(guān)系不斷下降,不利于產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目合作關(guān)系的建立。 在具有無標(biāo)度特征的產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)中,贏留輸變策略對于促使產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目迅速達(dá)到穩(wěn)定合作關(guān)系的作用效果較差,同時,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目合作關(guān)系隨著項目的實施,得到了不同程度的提高,但受到初始合作比例的影響,最終穩(wěn)定的項目合作關(guān)系比值差別較大,較高的初始合作比例促使最終合作關(guān)系比值較高,相反較低的初始合作比例,最終得到的合作關(guān)系比值仍較低；采取以牙還牙策略的產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目合作關(guān)系比值呈現(xiàn)出迅速下降趨勢。隨著初始合作比例的增加,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目合作關(guān)系比值下降的速度越快,但相對增加幅度并沒有明顯的提高。上述結(jié)果說明,在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目啟動階段,項目核心利益相關(guān)方合作關(guān)系較弱時,積極采取有效的懲罰措施,能實現(xiàn)合作關(guān)系的快速建立,在之后隨著項目規(guī)模的逐漸擴(kuò)大,還應(yīng)積極實施鼓勵和刺激合作的管理策略,以加快產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目合作關(guān)系的建立,來保證產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目的合作效果,確保產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目目標(biāo)的實現(xiàn)。 本文以產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險作為研究對象,認(rèn)為目前對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目風(fēng)險的研究,忽視了產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目“嵌入”社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)后,結(jié)構(gòu)演變所造成的治理風(fēng)險。為此,本文采用仿真技術(shù)模擬了上述影響過程,并依據(jù)演化規(guī)律提出了相應(yīng)的管理策略和建議。主要的研究創(chuàng)新在于以下三個方面： 1.對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險研究視角的拓展。 依據(jù)格蘭諾維特的“嵌入性”理論,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目需“嵌入”社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)中才能實現(xiàn)其功能和價值。因此,產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險不僅僅存在于屬性風(fēng)險中,本文認(rèn)為更應(yīng)該從產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目關(guān)系風(fēng)險視角展開研究。產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目是由項目利益相關(guān)方構(gòu)成的社會網(wǎng)絡(luò),其治理風(fēng)險是由產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)改變而產(chǎn)生的社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)風(fēng)險引起的,探究產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)演化對治理風(fēng)險的影響和作用規(guī)律是本文的研究重點(diǎn),也是本文依據(jù)關(guān)系風(fēng)險視角對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險研究所作出的嘗試和探索。 2.對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素的甄別。 產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目風(fēng)險因素的研究作為產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作研究的核心內(nèi)容之一,一直是產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作研究的熱點(diǎn)。但有關(guān)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素的研究卻相對較少,仍處于探索階段。但從已有的少數(shù)研究成果中不難發(fā)現(xiàn),對于產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理的研究已形成了以統(tǒng)一分析過程迭代模型為主線的研究思路。依據(jù)上述思路,本文對當(dāng)前亟待明晰的產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險因素問題進(jìn)行了實證分析,提煉并概括出信任機(jī)制、知識擴(kuò)散過程、合作關(guān)系以及項目合作策略四個治理風(fēng)險關(guān)鍵因素,這為探究產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險的作用機(jī)理提供了研究數(shù)據(jù)和基礎(chǔ),也是本文對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險研究的重要成果之一。 3.對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)動態(tài)演化規(guī)律的探析。 產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險的作用機(jī)理一直是學(xué)者們研究的重要內(nèi)容之一。由于當(dāng)前研究較多的關(guān)注個體屬性風(fēng)險,使得目前的研究思路通常假設(shè)產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作關(guān)系總是處于相對穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。本文認(rèn)為產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險是由于產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)的變化而產(chǎn)生的。為此,本文運(yùn)用仿真技術(shù)建立并模擬了產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)的動態(tài)演變過程,從中觀察和度量了產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險的變化規(guī)律,揭示出產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險的作用機(jī)理。仿真結(jié)果證明,仿真技術(shù)對于研究產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)的動態(tài)演化具有適用性和可行性。研究結(jié)論可以較好的揭示出產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險在項目社會網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)演變中的動態(tài)變化規(guī)律及其作用機(jī)理。這彌補(bǔ)了當(dāng)前僅注重對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險作用機(jī)理靜態(tài)研究的不足,為后續(xù)的相關(guān)研究提供了重要的研究思路和研究方法。 本文僅對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險中的關(guān)系風(fēng)險進(jìn)行了研究,屬性風(fēng)險作為產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險的兩類風(fēng)險因素之一,其與關(guān)系風(fēng)險之間存在一定程度的關(guān)聯(lián)性,在后續(xù)研究中應(yīng)系統(tǒng)的將上述兩類風(fēng)險作為一個有機(jī)的整體進(jìn)行分析,這對于全面認(rèn)識和降低產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險將起到積極的推動作用。與此同時也應(yīng)看到,不同規(guī)模、行業(yè)和類型的產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險具有一定的差異性,今后的研究中,應(yīng)針對上述產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目治理風(fēng)險的差異性展開研究,以進(jìn)一步從整體上提升我國產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作項目的知識創(chuàng)新效率和效益。
[Abstract]:The establishment of an innovative country is the core strategy of our country's development in the next ten years. This has decided to improve the efficiency and efficiency of knowledge innovation. The project is one of the effective ways to promote the realization of the above objectives. In our domestic research and research cooperation project, it is difficult to establish between organizations because the project is a cross organization project. The efficient coordination mechanism will lead to the lack of effective coordination and utilization of resources, resulting in the high failure rate of the project, the result of which is bound to affect the speed and effect of knowledge innovation. The above problems have exceeded the scope of the project management research. In this case, the management of the cooperative project of production research and research is more effective. Therefore, on the basis of the empirical analysis of the risk factors of the production, learning and research cooperation project, this paper uses the simulation technology to reveal the evolvement of the social network structure evolution of the project to the governing risk factors, and puts forward the management strategies and suggestions. The success of the eye is of great significance.
From the perspective of the evolution of social network structure, this paper studies the risk of project governance in industry university research cooperation. The main contents are divided into three parts:
The first part, the first chapter and the second chapter, reviews the related research of the cooperative project of production, learning and research. Through the literature review, we find that the research on the management risk of the cooperative project of the production, learning and research is at present, and the governance risk caused by the structural change is ignored after the "embedded" social network structure of the cooperative project. Based on the above analysis, this paper identifies the paper. The research and research cooperation project is a social network based on trust relationship, which is composed of enterprises, institutions of higher learning, scientific research institutions and intermediaries. The risk of governance mainly comes from the network structure risk caused by the changes in the social network structure of the cooperative project. Therefore, this paper defines the problem as how. The analysis of the social network structure risk of the cooperative project, the project, the project management and the social network analysis are also carried out to provide theoretical support for the research of the main part of the paper.
The second part, the third chapter of the paper, carries out an empirical analysis on the risk factors of the management of the cooperative project of production, learning and research. This part combs the risk factors of the cooperation project of production, learning and research from three aspects of the partners, the cooperation process and the cooperative environment. The results of the project are refined and defined, and the experimental design is carried out according to the above results. Through the questionnaire survey method and factor analysis method, the risk factors of the research and research cooperation project are extracted, and the multiple regression analysis method is used to deal with the risk factors of the project and the success of the project management. The correlation is tested. The conclusion of this part is not only the in-depth analysis and scientific demonstration of the research issues raised in the first part, but also the definition and definition of the third part of the research.
The third part, the fourth chapter, the fifth chapter and the sixth chapter, analyzes the risk evolution law of the social network structure of the cooperative project of production, learning and research. This part, on the basis of the theoretical analysis of the risk factors of the project, uses the MATLAB software to simulate and analyze the development of the social network structure of the project to the cooperation item of the production, learning and research. Through the analysis of the results, the paper reveals the evolution law of the risk factors governing the project's social network structure change, and formulating the management strategies and suggestions for the cooperation project of production research and research according to the evolution law, in order to reduce the risk of the cooperation project of production, school and research. It guarantees theoretical support and practical guidance for the success of the project.
In this paper, we study the risk of the management of the cooperative project, pay attention to the influence of the social network structure evolution on the risk factors of the project, the empirical method and the simulation technology are used to analyze the influence process. The main conclusions are as follows:
1. the project governance risk of the industry university research cooperation mainly comes from four key factors: trust mechanism, knowledge diffusion process, project cooperation relationship and cooperation strategy.
This paper analyzes the risk factors of the production, learning and research cooperation project through the questionnaire survey method. The research shows that the risk factors of the project are focused on four key factors: trust mechanism, knowledge diffusion process, cooperative relationship and project cooperation strategy. At the same time, this paper uses multiple regression analysis to cause trust mechanism. The correlation between the factors of the knowledge diffusion process, the cooperation relationship and the project cooperation strategy and the success of the project management is tested. It can be seen from the test results that the factors of trust mechanism, the cooperative relationship and the project cooperation strategy contribute to the micro governance, the success of macro governance and the success of the project governance. The positive influence of the knowledge diffusion process factor has a positive impact on the success of micro governance and the success of the project governance, and it has a weak impact on the success of macro governance. From the results of the above research, it can be concluded that the success of the project management of the cooperative project of production, learning and research not only pays attention to the project management category, but also strengthens the construction of the management environment of the cooperation project of production research and research.
2. the risk factors of trust mechanism in the risk factors of the production, learning and research cooperation project, with the change of the property of the individual relationship in the social network structure of the industry and research and research cooperation project, show the nonlinear evolution law.
From the simulation results, we can reduce the government's direct administrative intervention to the enterprises, universities and scientific research institutions and intermediary agencies, maintain the relatively independent operation mode of the project participants, and enhance the trust state between the participants in the project of production, research and research cooperation. The trust state of the participants in the project can be more stable. It is necessary to point out that although the institutions of higher learning and scientific research units have great influence, the trust state of their own is not greatly changed. This shows that the trust in the research and research cooperation project is more trust and over from the system. Cheng Xinren, a well-known expert or scientific research institution can not enhance the level of trust among the participants in the project, nor can it ensure the realization of the target of the project, and the guarantee of the real value of the project is derived from the good environment of the project management; the differences between the enterprises and the institutions of higher learning and scientific research units make it possible His participation in the industry university research cooperation project is divided by individuals' trust in the above two individuals.
Once the participants have differences in the understanding and judgment of the target or value of the project, it is easy to cause the production of multiple groups in the cooperative project of production, learning and research. These groups have a high state of trust, but the state of trust among the groups is low. With the gradual increase of the target difference, it may lead to the withdrawal of the same value group.
The participation of 3. production, learning and research cooperation projects among individuals, diffusion will and influence, and the status of the diffuser have significant influence on the factors of knowledge diffusion in the risk of management of the cooperative project.
From the simulation results, it can be found that in the process of knowledge diffusion, there is a positive correlation between the inter individual trust, the willingness and influence of the knowledge diffuser and the average speed of knowledge diffusion. In a big time, the more conducive to promoting the diffusion of implicit knowledge among individuals: the location of the initial knowledge diffuser has a great influence on the number and speed of knowledge diffusion. In the process of knowledge diffusion, the more likely the knowledge diffuser may become the core member of the project, the tacit knowledge is cooperated with the production, learning and research. The greater the number of projects participating in the individual receiving, the faster the knowledge diffusion of the project, the industry, the research and research cooperation project has reached a certain scale, the instantaneous speed of knowledge diffusion in the cooperative project of production, research and research has the greatest value, that is, the optimal diffusion scale of the knowledge level of the cooperative project of production, research and research, with the integration of production, learning and research. When the instantaneous velocity of the project knowledge diffusion reaches the maximum, the instantaneous diffusion speed begins to decline and presents a downward trend. This shows that the cooperative project of production, learning and research needs cooperation, training and other technical means to achieve a certain threshold for the knowledge level of the cooperation project of the industry and research institutes to achieve the high speed diffusion of implicit knowledge. The boundary of the project is not conducive to the absorption and utilization of the tacit knowledge outside the project.
The cooperative factors in the 4. production, learning and research cooperation projects are accompanied by the change of the cooperative strategic factors, which show different dynamic evolution laws under the complex characteristics of the social network structure of different projects.
In the social network with the characteristics of small world, with the increasing of the average node degree of the network, the average path length of the network is decreasing, but the aggregation coefficient is increasing, which shows that the cooperation project of the industry, University and research cooperation project participates in the individual. There is a tendency to form small internal groups, at the same time, the decrease of the average path length is more conducive to internal communication and knowledge diffusion, especially for the spread and diffusion of tacit knowledge. The efficiency is high. Under this strategy, increasing the number of projects to participate in the cooperation between individuals can promote the increase in the proportion of cooperative relations; the rate of timeliness is also high, but under this strategy, the cooperation relationship of the cooperation projects of production, learning and research is declining continuously, which is unfavorable to the establishment of the cooperative relationship of the research and research cooperation project.
In the social network with the characteristics of the scale without the scale, the effect of winning and losing and transferring strategy is less effective in promoting the cooperative relationship between the industry and research and research cooperation project quickly. At the same time, the cooperation relationship of the production, research and research cooperation project has been improved with the implementation of the project, but it is influenced by the proportion of the initial cooperation. The ratio of the final cooperative relationship is different, the higher proportion of the initial cooperation leads to the higher ratio of the final cooperative relationship, and the lower initial cooperation ratio, the ratio of the final cooperative relationship is still low. The increase in the proportion of cooperation and cooperation between enterprises and research institutes is faster, but the relative increase is not obviously improved. The results show that, when the cooperative relationship between the core stakeholders of the project is weak, the effective punishment measures can be taken to achieve the rapid cooperation relationship. With the rapid development of the project, with the gradual expansion of the scale of the project, we should also actively implement the management strategies to encourage and stimulate cooperation, in order to speed up the establishment of the cooperative relationship between the cooperative projects of production, learning and research, to ensure the cooperation effect of the cooperative project of the production, research and research, and to ensure the realization of the target of the project.
In this paper, the risk of the production, learning and research cooperation project is taken as the research object, and the research on the risk of the cooperative project is considered at present, and the governance risk caused by the structure evolution is ignored after the "embedded" social network structure of the cooperative project of the industry and Research Institute. Corresponding management strategies and suggestions are put forward. The main research innovations lie in the following three aspects:
1., expand the perspective of project governance risk research.
Basis

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G322;F224

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 蔣天穎;吳福象;;基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)嵌入的高新技術(shù)集群企業(yè)知識創(chuàng)新研究[J];情報雜志;2013年04期

2 孫亞男;孫麗華;;應(yīng)急項目中多組織協(xié)同治理策略研究[J];山東財政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年06期

3 孫亞男;;碳交易市場中的碳稅策略研究[J];中國人口.資源與環(huán)境;2014年03期

，

本文編號：1861203