本文選題：科研項(xiàng)目 + 同行評(píng)議��； 參考：《天津大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：“國(guó)家中長(zhǎng)期科技發(fā)展規(guī)劃綱要(2006-2020)”中指出:到2020年,中國(guó)科技進(jìn)步對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的貢獻(xiàn)率要提高到60%左右,研發(fā)投入占GDP比重要提高到2.5%。隨著政府和社會(huì)對(duì)科技投入的不斷加大,科研項(xiàng)目資金越來(lái)越多,如何合理、公平地配置科研資源,評(píng)價(jià)科研成果,促使科研項(xiàng)目有重點(diǎn)地發(fā)展,更好地服務(wù)于創(chuàng)新型國(guó)家的建設(shè),同行評(píng)議成為保證科研質(zhì)量最為主要的方式之一。 同行評(píng)議專(zhuān)家的誠(chéng)信直接影響著科研項(xiàng)目評(píng)審的結(jié)果和質(zhì)量,現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)中學(xué)風(fēng)浮躁和學(xué)術(shù)不端等不良行為的出現(xiàn),專(zhuān)家失信案件的曝光,學(xué)術(shù)界受到越來(lái)越多的質(zhì)疑,科研誠(chéng)信和學(xué)風(fēng)建設(shè)成為黨和國(guó)家、社會(huì)高度關(guān)注的話(huà)題。 論文定量分析與定性分析相結(jié)合,綜合運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)研究、國(guó)際比較研究、訪(fǎng)談?wù){(diào)研和模擬實(shí)驗(yàn)方法對(duì)當(dāng)前我國(guó)科研項(xiàng)目同行評(píng)議中專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,深入探討專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信體系的建立健全,并提出有針對(duì)性的專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信體系建設(shè)的對(duì)策建議。 論文首先通過(guò)理論分析,確定影響專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信的可能原因。其次,比較借鑒國(guó)外典型科研管理機(jī)構(gòu)同行評(píng)議的管理措施和辦法,進(jìn)而綜合分析了目前我國(guó)科研項(xiàng)目同行評(píng)議的現(xiàn)狀和專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信的現(xiàn)狀。然后,結(jié)合教育部與天津市科研管理部門(mén)的訪(fǎng)談和天津市近年來(lái)同行評(píng)議數(shù)據(jù)的定量分析,并輔之以小范圍的實(shí)驗(yàn)?zāi)M對(duì)專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信影響因素進(jìn)行深入分析。最后,建立我國(guó)科研項(xiàng)目同行評(píng)議專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信體系,并針對(duì)科研機(jī)構(gòu)提出提升同行評(píng)議專(zhuān)家誠(chéng)信的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:In the outline of the National Medium- and Long-Term Science and Technology Development Plan 2006-2020, it is pointed out that by 2020, the contribution rate of China's scientific and technological progress to economic growth will be increased to about 60 percent, and the proportion of R & D investment to GDP will increase to 2.5 percent. With the increasing investment of the government and society in science and technology, more and more funds for scientific research projects. How to allocate scientific research resources reasonably and fairly, evaluate scientific research results, and promote the development of scientific research projects, Peer review has become one of the most important ways to guarantee the quality of scientific research. The integrity of peer review experts has a direct impact on the results and quality of the evaluation of scientific research projects. In reality, the emergence of bad behaviors such as impetuosity and academic misconduct in the society, the exposure of cases of expert dishonesty, the academic circles are more and more questioned. The construction of scientific integrity and style of study has become a topic of great concern to the Party and the country and society. This paper combines quantitative analysis with qualitative analysis, and analyzes the present situation of experts' integrity in peer review of scientific research projects in China by comprehensive use of literature research, international comparative research, interview and simulation experiment methods. This paper probes into the establishment and perfection of the expert credit system, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the construction of the expert credit system. Firstly, through theoretical analysis, the paper determines the possible reasons that affect the integrity of experts. Secondly, the paper compares the management measures and methods of peer review of typical foreign scientific research management institutions, and then comprehensively analyzes the status quo of peer review of scientific research projects in China and the status of integrity of experts. Then, combined with the interview between the Ministry of Education and Tianjin Scientific Research Management Department and the quantitative analysis of the peer review data in Tianjin in recent years, the factors that affect the integrity of experts are deeply analyzed with a small scale of experimental simulation. Finally, the author establishes the system of peer review experts' integrity in our country's scientific research projects, and puts forward countermeasures and suggestions for scientific research institutions to promote peer review experts' integrity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G322

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 Anthony F．J．Van Raan;劉俊婉;馬建華;;h指數(shù)與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)文獻(xiàn)計(jì)量學(xué)指標(biāo)及同行評(píng)議之間的關(guān)系[J];科學(xué)觀察;2006年01期

2 朱大明;;基于換位思考的同行審稿行為自律[J];科技導(dǎo)報(bào);2011年06期

3 劉求實(shí)，，丁厚德，王玉堂;同行評(píng)議中的“非共識(shí)”問(wèn)題研究[J];科技導(dǎo)報(bào);1995年01期

4 鄭淼;王小理;孫繼林;;英美主要醫(yī)學(xué)研究機(jī)構(gòu)的同行評(píng)議實(shí)踐[J];科技管理研究;2007年11期

5 李芬;張建新;侯潤(rùn)蘭;;我國(guó)同行評(píng)議論文引文狀況的分析報(bào)告——基于CNKI核心期刊的文獻(xiàn)研究[J];科技管理研究;2010年03期

6 李瑩,李燕萍;我國(guó)評(píng)估評(píng)審專(zhuān)家評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建問(wèn)題研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2005年01期

7 楊列勛,汪壽陽(yáng),席酉民;科學(xué)基金遴選中非共識(shí)研究項(xiàng)目的評(píng)估研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2002年02期

8 龔旭;同行評(píng)議公正性的影響因素分析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2004年06期

9 鄭稱(chēng)德;同行評(píng)議專(zhuān)家工作業(yè)績(jī)測(cè)評(píng)及其模型研究[J];科研管理;2002年02期

10 龔旭;中美同行評(píng)議公正性政策比較研究[J];科研管理;2005年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 余曉潔;[N];中國(guó)有色金屬報(bào);2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 彭賀;人為激勵(lì)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年

2 賀穎;基于科學(xué)計(jì)量視角的同行評(píng)議專(zhuān)家遴選問(wèn)題研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 黃寶晟;國(guó)家科學(xué)基金評(píng)審中基礎(chǔ)研究的創(chuàng)新保護(hù)分析[D];清華大學(xué);2004年

2 劉培蕾;大學(xué)生學(xué)術(shù)誠(chéng)信缺失的原因及其教育對(duì)策研究[D];西南大學(xué);2007年

3 劉魯寧;科技項(xiàng)目同行評(píng)議體系反評(píng)估模型分析與設(shè)計(jì)[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

4 楊素娟;科技項(xiàng)目立項(xiàng)同行評(píng)議評(píng)審專(zhuān)家反評(píng)價(jià)體系構(gòu)建研究[D];沈陽(yáng)理工大學(xué);2009年

5 徐成東;基于結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型的高校教師科研績(jī)效壓力與科研誠(chéng)信影響機(jī)制研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1808217