本文選題：發(fā)明專利制度　切入點(diǎn)：發(fā)明專利權(quán)　出處：《華中科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：專利制度的宗旨在于保護(hù)真正的發(fā)明創(chuàng)造，促進(jìn)科技經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，專利制度的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)原理是通過更快的創(chuàng)新來彌補(bǔ)專利權(quán)壟斷所帶來的損失。近幾年，隨著專利保護(hù)意識(shí)的增強(qiáng)，發(fā)明專利權(quán)保護(hù)壟斷性預(yù)期引發(fā)了發(fā)明專利申請(qǐng)競(jìng)賽，給專利審查部門造成了沉重的壓力，專利審查質(zhì)量下降，部分專利申請(qǐng)雖然獲得了授權(quán)，但是其排他性卻不能得到社會(huì)公眾的有效認(rèn)可，造成發(fā)明專利權(quán)穩(wěn)定性缺失，這樣的專利反而會(huì)阻礙技術(shù)創(chuàng)新。本文深入研究了發(fā)明專利權(quán)穩(wěn)定性缺失問題，，對(duì)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新以及我國(guó)專利制度改革具有重要的理論指導(dǎo)意義和實(shí)踐意義。 論文在整體構(gòu)思上，按照提出問題，分析問題和解決問題的邏輯順序依次展開。本文對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行梳理之后，針對(duì)我國(guó)實(shí)際情況，首先對(duì)發(fā)明專利權(quán)穩(wěn)定性缺失的原因從實(shí)質(zhì)因素和程序因素兩方面進(jìn)行了分析，并將程序因素劃分為 事前界定‖和 事后界定‖兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行著重分析，基于發(fā)明專利審查資源的有限性以及發(fā)明專利價(jià)值分布的不均衡性，本文認(rèn)為 事后界定‖更加經(jīng)濟(jì)有效。其次，本文分析了發(fā)明專利權(quán)穩(wěn)定性缺失對(duì)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響，進(jìn)一步強(qiáng)化加強(qiáng)發(fā)明專利權(quán)穩(wěn)定性的重要意義。再次，在我國(guó)已有專利制度的基礎(chǔ)上，主要從專利授權(quán)制度和專利審查費(fèi)用兩方面對(duì)專利制度提出具有可行性的改進(jìn)建議，以期對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的專利授權(quán)模式進(jìn)行優(yōu)化，提升現(xiàn)有審查效能。最后，得出全文結(jié)論，研究專利權(quán)穩(wěn)定性問題具有重要的理論意義和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義，有助于完善發(fā)明專利制度，增強(qiáng)發(fā)明專利權(quán)穩(wěn)定性，讓專利制度更好地服務(wù)于科技經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The aim of patent system is to protect real invention and promote the development of science and technology economy. The economic principle of patent system is to compensate for the loss caused by patent monopoly through faster innovation. The monopoly expectation of patent protection of invention has triggered a competition for patent applications for inventions, which has put heavy pressure on patent examination departments. The quality of patent examination has declined. Although some patent applications have been authorized, However, its exclusiveness can not be recognized effectively by the public, which leads to the lack of patent stability of invention, which will hinder the technological innovation. This paper deeply studies the problem of the lack of patent stability of invention, which is competitive with the market. Technological innovation and patent system reform in China have important theoretical and practical significance. The whole conception of the paper is carried out according to the logical sequence of problem raising, problem analysis and problem solving. After combing the domestic and foreign research situation, the thesis aims at the actual situation of our country. First of all, the reasons for the lack of patent stability of invention are analyzed from two aspects: substantive factors and procedural factors, and the procedural factors are divided into two levels: pre-definition and post-definition. Based on the limitation of the resources of patent examination and the imbalance of the distribution of the value of the patent of invention, this paper thinks that it is more economical and effective to define after the invention. Secondly, This paper analyzes the influence of the absence of patent stability on market competition and technological innovation, and further strengthens the importance of strengthening the stability of invention patent rights. Thirdly, on the basis of the existing patent system in China, In order to optimize the current patent licensing mode in China and enhance the effectiveness of the current examination, this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions for improving the patent system from the two aspects of patent licensing system and patent examination cost. Finally, the paper draws a conclusion in this paper. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the stability of patent right, which is helpful to perfect the system of invention patent, strengthen the stability of patent right of invention, and make the patent system serve the development of science and technology economy better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：G306

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 張勤;;析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則國(guó)際化[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年10期

2 王鵬;;專利權(quán)二次界定的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

3 齊超;;制度含義及其本質(zhì)之我見[J];稅務(wù)與經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年03期

4 李順德;;健全知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法和管理體制[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2008年08期

5 文家春;;政府資助專利費(fèi)用引發(fā)垃圾專利的成因與對(duì)策[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2008年04期

6 李明德;;專利權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)確權(quán)機(jī)制的改革思路[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

7 王會(huì)良;和金生;;專利模糊性:一種新型專利價(jià)值視角[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年09期

8 王先林;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用及其法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2004年03期

9 陳子龍;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突及司法裁量[J];人民司法;2000年02期

本文編號(hào)：1623906