“項目治教”的邏輯限度分析
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-05 11:13
【摘要】：在新時代背景下,作為一種與單位制、科層制邏輯相區(qū)別的治理機制,項目制依憑其自身優(yōu)勢特點與制度抱負(fù)開始擔(dān)任構(gòu)筑一流高等教育的歷史職責(zé),從而累積"項目治教"的"績效合法性"。然而,項目制實踐中遵循的一事一議、擇優(yōu)、技術(shù)理性、規(guī)劃控制等獨特邏輯,似乎懸置了高等教育中的"地方性知識"這一本體性命題,因而不得不承受高等教育系統(tǒng)中的治理碎片化、馬太效應(yīng)、價值理性的失落、被規(guī)劃的高等教育等邏輯限度,使"項目治教"在高等教育領(lǐng)域中面臨正當(dāng)性與合理性的質(zhì)疑與拷問。因此,當(dāng)我們通過"項目治教"獲取高等教育效率與技術(shù)收益時,更應(yīng)不斷檢省"項目治教"這一治理行動本身是否正當(dāng)與合理。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the new era, as a kind of governance mechanism which is different from the unit system and the hierarchy system logic, the project system begins to take the historical responsibility of constructing the first-class higher education by virtue of its own superiority characteristic and system ambition. Thus accumulates "the item governs the education" the "performance legitimacy". However, in the practice of project system, the unique logic, such as selection of merit, technical rationality, planning control and so on, seems to have suspended the Noumenon proposition of "local knowledge" in higher education. As a result, they have to bear the logical limits of the fragmentation of governance in the higher education system, the Matthew effect, the loss of value rationality, and the planned higher education. In the field of higher education, "Project Education" is confronted with questioning and questioning of legitimacy and rationality. Therefore, when we obtain higher education efficiency and technical benefits through "project management", we should constantly check whether the governance action of "project administration" is proper and reasonable.
【作者單位】： 海南政法學(xué)院教務(wù)處;海南政法學(xué)院公安司法系;
【基金】：全國教育科學(xué)“十二五”規(guī)劃教育部青年項目“高職教育專業(yè)設(shè)置管理與預(yù)警機制研究”(EJA120405)
【分類號】：G640
[Abstract]:Under the background of the new era, as a kind of governance mechanism which is different from the unit system and the hierarchy system logic, the project system begins to take the historical responsibility of constructing the first-class higher education by virtue of its own superiority characteristic and system ambition. Thus accumulates "the item governs the education" the "performance legitimacy". However, in the practice of project system, the unique logic, such as selection of merit, technical rationality, planning control and so on, seems to have suspended the Noumenon proposition of "local knowledge" in higher education. As a result, they have to bear the logical limits of the fragmentation of governance in the higher education system, the Matthew effect, the loss of value rationality, and the planned higher education. In the field of higher education, "Project Education" is confronted with questioning and questioning of legitimacy and rationality. Therefore, when we obtain higher education efficiency and technical benefits through "project management", we should constantly check whether the governance action of "project administration" is proper and reasonable.
【作者單位】： 海南政法學(xué)院教務(wù)處;海南政法學(xué)院公安司法系;
【基金】：全國教育科學(xué)“十二五”規(guī)劃教育部青年項目“高職教育專業(yè)設(shè)置管理與預(yù)警機制研究”(EJA120405)
【分類號】：G640
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 趙希文;楊海;石影;;大一年度創(chuàng)新項目及其管理[J];高教論壇;2012年07期
2 李蓬寧;;新的高等學(xué)校財務(wù)制度下如何做項目申報[J];科技信息;2013年16期
3 周萍;沈貴鵬;;高校教師發(fā)展項目的開發(fā)與實施研究——以高校競爭性教研資助項目“教師卓越工程計劃”為例[J];江蘇高教;2013年05期
4 沈玉順;;高校涉外項目引進管理[J];高等師范教育研究;1993年05期
5 李志霞;顏冰;陶冶;;以項目設(shè)計為主線實踐育人的幾點啟示[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期
6 劉靜;;項目教學(xué)法在高校心理委員培訓(xùn)中的應(yīng)用[J];學(xué)理論;2012年06期
7 王允修,宗剛;論高等教育項目[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年04期
8 賈媛;;關(guān)于項目教學(xué)法在物流專業(yè)教學(xué)中應(yīng)用的探討[J];學(xué)周刊;2014年12期
9 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 肖U，
本文編號：2401704
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2401704.html
最近更新
教材專著
