發(fā)布時間：2018-12-27 12:22

【摘要】：[目的/意義]由于學(xué)科之間發(fā)文量、引用量的差異,同時注意到科研實體(如機構(gòu)、研究團隊或個人)的學(xué)術(shù)成果涉及多學(xué)科,針對科研評價體系設(shè)計一種標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化計算框架,消除由于不同學(xué)科的差異性帶來的科研績效不可比性,并且將科研實體屬于不同學(xué)科的學(xué)術(shù)成果有效地加以綜合表征。[方法/過程]從科研總量、科研質(zhì)量和前沿研究三個角度設(shè)計標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化指標(biāo),從而構(gòu)建了一套適用于不同科研實體的科研評價指標(biāo)體系,以四川大學(xué)為例,選取單個科研人員、研究團隊以及ESI學(xué)科三個不同層面的科研實體進行評價。[結(jié)果/結(jié)論]從實證分析中可以看到,該評價體系能將同一科研實體屬于不同學(xué)科的學(xué)術(shù)成果有效地加以綜合表征,不僅消除了科研實體之間由于學(xué)科差異造成的影響,并且可以推廣至個人、研究團隊以及機構(gòu)等不同層面的科研實體科研績效評價,同時也希望為其它科研評價體系的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化處理提供一種思路和方法。
[Abstract]:[objective / significance] because of the differences in the number of papers and citations between disciplines, and noting that the academic results of scientific research entities (such as institutions, research teams or individuals) involve multiple disciplines, a standardized computing framework is designed for scientific research evaluation systems, It eliminates the incomparability of scientific research performance caused by the differences of different disciplines and effectively represents the academic achievements of scientific research entities belonging to different disciplines. [methods] the standardized indexes were designed from three angles of total scientific research amount, scientific research quality and frontier research, and a set of scientific research evaluation index system suitable for different scientific research entities was constructed. Taking Sichuan University as an example, a single scientific research personnel was selected. Research teams and research entities at three different levels of the ESI discipline were evaluated. [results / conclusions] it can be seen from the empirical analysis that the evaluation system can effectively represent the academic achievements of the same scientific research entity belonging to different disciplines, and not only eliminate the influence of the differences between scientific research entities, It can also be extended to the evaluation of scientific research performance of scientific research entities at different levels, such as individuals, research teams and institutions. At the same time, it also hopes to provide a way of thinking and method for the standardization of other scientific research evaluation systems.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)圖書館;
【基金】：四川大學(xué)2017年度“圖書館、情報與文獻(xiàn)學(xué)”項目“雙一流建設(shè)背景下高�？蒲袑嶓w學(xué)術(shù)影響力的多維度評價體系設(shè)計”(編號:sktq201725) 四川大學(xué)2016年青年教師科研啟動基金項目“學(xué)科標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的科研評估指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建及實證研究”(編號:2016SCU11059)研究成果之一
【分類號】：G311;G353.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 馮花樸;;InCites數(shù)據(jù)庫科研績效評估的有效工具[J];現(xiàn)代情報;2014年01期

2 何惠芬;陳欣;;基于InCites數(shù)據(jù)庫聲學(xué)領(lǐng)域的科研績效評估分析[J];情報探索;2013年05期

3 衛(wèi)世平;建立社科界同行單位科研績效分析數(shù)據(jù)庫的思考[J];前沿;2003年10期

4 丁福虎;張水潮;;利用CNKI和H指數(shù)評價大學(xué)科研績效[J];科技管理研究;2010年13期

，

本文編號：2393055