【摘要】：公共政策領(lǐng)域本身的特點決定了治理模式的選擇。在治理目標具有綜合性、技術(shù)路徑清晰度低、環(huán)境差異敏感度高的"復雜政策"領(lǐng)域,向基層政府"授權(quán)"有利于提升治理的有效性,但也增加了其利用信息優(yōu)勢和自由裁量空間發(fā)生"道德風險"的可能。鑒于此,在"復雜政策"的治理領(lǐng)域中,中央政府在常規(guī)的目標設(shè)定與督查考核之外,通過出臺綱領(lǐng)性、指導性的專項政策,以及擴大社區(qū)參與等多種控制手段來規(guī)訓地方政府的偏差行為。"復雜政策"治理模式旨在建立"央—地"之間的協(xié)作機制,發(fā)揮好中央和地方"兩個積極性",從而彌合中央政府對政策推進的總體控制與地方政府在行政實踐中自由裁量權(quán)之間的張力。從實踐績效來看,該模式無疑是有益的探索,但有待于進一步的優(yōu)化與完善。
[Abstract]:The choice of governance mode is determined by the characteristics of public policy field itself. In the "complex policy" areas where governance objectives are comprehensive, technical path clarity is low, and environmental disparity sensitivity is high, "empowerment" of grass-roots governments is conducive to enhancing the effectiveness of governance. But it also increases its use of information advantages and discretionary space to occur "moral hazard." In view of this, in the field of governance of "complex policies," the central government, in addition to the conventional goal setting and inspection and examination, has adopted programmatic and guiding special policies. And expand community participation and other means of control to discipline local government deviant behavior. " The complex policy "governance model" aims to establish collaborative mechanisms between "central and local" areas, Give full play to the "two positives" of the central and local governments so as to bridge the tension between the central government's overall control over the promotion of policies and the local governments' discretion in administrative practice. From the point of view of practical performance, this model is undoubtedly a beneficial exploration, but needs to be further optimized and perfected.
【作者單位】： 華中師范大學社會學院湖北省社會發(fā)展與社會政策研究中心;華中師范大學可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究中心;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目(13CSH087) 國家自然科學基金項目(41401165)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D63

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 程超;反腐敗也要有兩個積極性[J];黨政論壇;1994年06期

2 張雨生;;改革亦如逆水行舟[J];學習月刊;2007年03期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 余知鵬;社區(qū)應發(fā)揮三大作用[N];中國社會報;2006年

，

本文編號：2144017