【摘要】：為了厘清現(xiàn)有的扶貧政策對(duì)林區(qū)的減貧效果,探索扶貧政策在林區(qū)貧困縣與非貧困縣實(shí)施的效果差異,利用2008~2014年贛南林區(qū)15個(gè)林業(yè)縣的面板數(shù)據(jù),首先通過(guò)描述性統(tǒng)計(jì)分析的方法,比較了林區(qū)貧困縣和非貧困縣在人均GDP和農(nóng)村居民人均純收入兩方面的差異變化,再利用方差分析法和計(jì)量回歸模型,探究影響林區(qū)貧困縣和非貧困縣在人均GDP和農(nóng)村居民人均純收入上存在差異的顯著因素。結(jié)果表明:在2008~2014年期間,贛州林區(qū)貧困縣的人均GDP增長(zhǎng)量?jī)H為非貧困縣的60.73%,造成差異的主要影響因素是人均固定資產(chǎn)投資額和人均消費(fèi)額;貧困縣的農(nóng)村居民人均純收入增長(zhǎng)量為非貧困縣的126.85%,造成差異的主要影響因素是農(nóng)村人均固定資產(chǎn)投資額和農(nóng)村從業(yè)人員數(shù)。政府扶貧工作對(duì)林區(qū)貧困縣農(nóng)戶(hù)減貧效果比較明顯,但貧困縣和非貧困縣之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差距仍然很大,政府應(yīng)提高對(duì)貧困縣的固定資產(chǎn)投資水平,引導(dǎo)貧困縣居民轉(zhuǎn)變消費(fèi)觀(guān)念、促進(jìn)地方消費(fèi)。
[Abstract]:In order to clarify the effect of existing poverty alleviation policies on poverty reduction in forest regions, and to explore the difference of poverty reduction policies between poor and non-poor counties in forest regions, the panel data of 15 forestry counties in southern Jiangxi from 2008 to 2014 were used. First of all, through descriptive statistical analysis, this paper compares the differences between poor counties and non-poor counties in terms of per capita GDP and rural residents' per capita net income, and then uses variance analysis and econometric regression model. To explore the significant factors that affect the difference between poor counties and non-poor counties in per capita GDP and rural residents' per capita net income. The results show that in the period from 2008 to 2014, the increase of per capita GDP in the poor counties of Ganzhou forest area is only 60.73 of that of the non-poor counties, and the main factors influencing the difference are the per capita investment in fixed assets and the amount of per capita consumption. The increase of per capita net income of rural residents in poor counties is 126.85 in non-poverty counties. The main factors influencing the difference are the investment of fixed assets per capita and the number of rural employees. The government's poverty alleviation work is quite effective in reducing poverty among farmers in poor forest counties, but the gap in economic development between poor counties and non-poor counties is still very large. The government should raise the level of fixed assets investment in poor counties. Guide poor county residents to change their concept of consumption and promote local consumption.
【作者單位】： 江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院;江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)農(nóng)村土地資源利用與保護(hù)研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家自然科學(xué)基金資助項(xiàng)目(71463025、71363025、71663029) 江西現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)及其優(yōu)勢(shì)產(chǎn)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的決策支持協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心招標(biāo)(委托)課題(XDNYA1512) 江西省杰出青年人才計(jì)劃資助項(xiàng)目(2017BCB23043) 江西省百千萬(wàn)人才人選工程國(guó)(境)外研修計(jì)劃資助項(xiàng)目
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F323.8;F326.27

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林一明;嚴(yán)振良;林敏莉;李振平;梅雪華;;淺談林業(yè)縣促進(jìn)林農(nóng)增收的對(duì)策和措施[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)科技;2008年S1期

2 ;嚴(yán)防火災(zāi) 保護(hù)森林[J];云南林業(yè);1981年04期

3 徐永年;錢(qián)明榮;;h木考察記[J];浙江林業(yè);1997年01期

4 曉陽(yáng),輕云;天然林禁伐:林業(yè)縣的出路何在?[J];當(dāng)代貴州;2000年11期

5 李明亞;祁懷鑫;資建勛;王國(guó)華;;錦繡桃源綠意濃——桃源林業(yè)60年建設(shè)巡禮[J];湖南林業(yè);2009年10期

6 ;阜平:封山育林綠滿(mǎn)紅色圣地[J];河北林業(yè);2012年01期

7 蘇立貴;;四級(jí)聯(lián)營(yíng) 加速城郊綠化[J];廣西林業(yè);1989年04期

8 胡白云;;走活以林為主多種經(jīng)營(yíng)這盤(pán)棋[J];中國(guó)林副特產(chǎn);1989年01期

9 劉禮祖;;林權(quán)改革顯成果 贛鄱再掀植樹(shù)熱[J];綠色中國(guó);2007年05期

10 胡永柱;崔同林;;縣域林業(yè)特色產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與對(duì)策——以皖南涇縣木梳特色產(chǎn)業(yè)為例[J];中國(guó)林副特產(chǎn);2013年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2141048