發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-14 14:41

【摘要】：政策模糊是指決策者有意用含糊的、不太確定的形式表達(dá)政策目標(biāo),以增加應(yīng)變能力。這種政策現(xiàn)象被學(xué)術(shù)界廣泛詬病但又大量存在于中國的公共管理實(shí)踐之中。本文以分權(quán)化改革為觀察對象,梳理政策模糊與治理績效的相關(guān)性。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),分權(quán)化改革的政策模糊是單一制國家的公共權(quán)力自上而下配置與公共服務(wù)自下而上需求之間平衡后的無奈選擇,目的在于保證中央意志的執(zhí)行與地方治理主動性的統(tǒng)一。良好的政策效果使得雙方受益,政策效果差時(shí)也會自動實(shí)現(xiàn)社會風(fēng)險(xiǎn)向地方轉(zhuǎn)移,不會影響政治穩(wěn)定這一國家治理終極目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。但是,從長期來看,須實(shí)現(xiàn)治理有效性向治理正當(dāng)性轉(zhuǎn)變,這就要求政策模糊程度必須根據(jù)權(quán)力配置與政治穩(wěn)定的關(guān)系進(jìn)行靈活抉擇。
[Abstract]:Policy ambiguity means that decision-makers intentionally express policy goals in a vague and uncertain form in order to increase their resilience. This policy phenomenon has been widely criticized by the academic community but is widely used in the practice of public administration in China. This paper takes decentralization reform as the object of observation, and studies the correlation between the fuzzy policy and the governance performance. It is found that the policy ambiguity of decentralization reform is the choice between the top-down allocation of public power and the bottom-up demand of public service in a single state. The aim is to ensure the unity of the implementation of the central will and the initiative of local governance. The transfer of the present social risk to the local will not affect the realization of the ultimate goal of the political stability of the country. However, in the long run, it is necessary to realize the transformation of governance validity to the legitimacy of governance, which requires that the degree of policy ambiguity must be flexibly chosen according to the relationship between power allocation and political stability.
【作者單位】： 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“我國省直轄縣體制改革實(shí)踐模式的跟蹤比較研究”(編號:11CZZ041) 湖北省2016年度軟科學(xué)面上項(xiàng)目“省以下政府間科技管理事權(quán)劃分與職能定位研究”(編號:2016ADC103)
【分類號】：D630

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張毅;鄭俊田;;地方善治及其分權(quán)化改革的制度設(shè)計(jì)模式[J];中國行政管理;2010年07期

2 張毅;;地方政府創(chuàng)新的分權(quán)化制度供給模式[J];科學(xué)與管理;2010年03期

3 韓冬雪;;衡量國家治理績效的根本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];人民論壇;2014年10期

4 張歡;胡靜;;社會治理績效評估的公眾主觀指標(biāo)體系探討[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年02期

5 毛o，

本文編號：2121972