本文選題：深閱讀 + 爭議　； 參考：《國家圖書館學刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：學界關于深閱讀的理解仍存在著諸多爭議,未能滿足實踐繁榮下的理論需求。本研究從深度閱讀推廣目標設置、方案設計、績效評估的理論需要出發(fā),在梳理既有文獻、析出爭議焦點的同時,基于專家調(diào)查結果分析不同見解之間的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系,認為觀點沖突的根本問題在于研究者對于深閱讀的實現(xiàn)機制與價值訴求存在不同見解。通過對上述問題的探討,提出深閱讀是一場讀者深度參與的主體間性對話,其價值一方面表現(xiàn)為閱讀的應用實踐價值、道德實踐價值等,另一方面則表現(xiàn)為讀者精神性與社會性需要的滿足及其所賦予讀者的閱讀興趣與可持續(xù)的閱讀動力。
[Abstract]:There are still many controversies on the understanding of deep reading in academic circles, which fails to meet the theoretical needs of the prosperity of practice. This study starts from the theoretical needs of in-depth reading promotion goal setting, scheme design and performance evaluation, combing the existing literature, separating the focus of controversy, and analyzing the internal relationship between different opinions based on the results of expert survey. It is believed that the fundamental problem of conflict of views is that researchers have different views on the realization mechanism of deep reading and the demand of value. Through the discussion of the above problems, the author points out that the deep reading is a dialogue between the subjects in which the readers are deeply involved. On the one hand, the value of the deep reading is shown as the practical value of reading, the value of moral practice, and so on. On the other hand, it shows the satisfaction of the readers' spiritual and social needs and the reader's reading interest and sustainable reading power.
【作者單位】： 四川大學公共管理學院信息資源管理系;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金重點項目“全媒體環(huán)境下復合閱讀行為及其閱讀推廣對策研究”(項目編號:16ATQ005)研究成果之一
【分類號】：G252.17

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 嚴海帆;余小小;;溫州市圖書館讀書話劇社的工作進展[J];圖書館學研究;2012年18期

2 王曉燕;;圖書館引導大學生深閱讀途徑探討[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2012年06期

，

本文編號：2091411