我國社會智庫有效性的評價和提升策略研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-06-19 12:49
本文選題:中國社會智庫 + 有效性; 參考:《中國科學技術(shù)大學》2017年博士論文
【摘要】:社會智庫是我國特色新型智庫的重要組成部分,也是我國體制內(nèi)智庫的重要補充和幫手。作為經(jīng)費自籌、人事獨立、利益中立的非體制內(nèi)研究機構(gòu),社會智庫以其獨特的優(yōu)勢正在發(fā)揮越來越重要的作用。但和體制內(nèi)智庫相比,我國社會智庫目前普遍存在影響力和認可度較低、獨立性不強、管理水平不高、資金來源不穩(wěn)定以及創(chuàng)新能力較弱等共性問題。本文認為,我國社會智庫存在的以上問題,可以歸結(jié)為有效性問題,即社會智庫的有效性不足。有效性是我國社會智庫競爭力和生存能力的重要體現(xiàn),社會智庫要想提升核心競爭力和生存能力,應(yīng)當首先提升其有效性。因此,研究我國社會智庫的有效性既可以彌補現(xiàn)有文獻對智庫研究的不足,也可以為我國社會智庫的有效發(fā)展提供科學的參考依據(jù)。首先,本文通過文獻研究和分析,對相關(guān)概念和內(nèi)容進行了界定,并通過訪談和問卷調(diào)查的形式對我國社會智庫有效性的影響因素進行分析、梳理和歸納,提煉出影響我國社會智庫有效性的內(nèi)外部關(guān)鍵影響因素,其中內(nèi)部關(guān)鍵影響因素包括管理、影響力、多元化和創(chuàng)新等四個方面。然后,對四個方面的關(guān)鍵影響因素進行細化和分解,形成十六個具體的、可衡量的指標。其中,管理方面包括戰(zhàn)略管理、組織結(jié)構(gòu)管理、制度管理和經(jīng)費管理等四個指標,影響力方面包括高層影響力、學術(shù)影響力、媒體影響力和國際影響力等四個指標,多元化方面包括服務(wù)方式多元化、經(jīng)費來源多元化、績效考核多元化和風險控制多元化等四個指標,創(chuàng)新方面包括信息化水平、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護、人員知識水平和創(chuàng)新環(huán)境和氛圍等四個指標。在此基礎(chǔ)上,本文構(gòu)建了由四個一級指標和十六個二級指標組成的我國社會智庫有效性的評價指標體系。然后,本文運用層次分析法確定了我國社會智庫有效性評價指標體系的各指標權(quán)重,包括一級指標和二級指標的權(quán)重。其中,一級指標的權(quán)重大小依次為影響力、創(chuàng)新、多元化和管理,而影響力的權(quán)重值較高,接近其它三個指標權(quán)重之和。確定了權(quán)重后,本文運用模糊綜合評價法對我國社會智庫的有效性進行了評價,并得出具體的評價分值。通過評價分值可以看出,我國社會智庫的總體有效性水平不高,位于一般和較好之間,有較大的提升空間。最后,結(jié)合我國社會智庫有效性的評價結(jié)果,本文依次從管理、影響力、多元化和創(chuàng)新等構(gòu)成評價指標體系的四個方面給出了提升我國社會智庫有效性的策略和建議。另外,由于政治環(huán)境也是我國社會智庫有效性的關(guān)鍵影響因素之一,社會智庫作為非體制內(nèi)智庫,受政府的認可程度和政策的影響較大,因此本文從政府方面也給出了提升我國社會智庫有效性的措施和對策。本文的創(chuàng)新之處體現(xiàn)在:1、關(guān)于社會智庫有效性的研究,國內(nèi)還沒有相關(guān)的文獻或研究內(nèi)容。本文將我國社會智庫的有效性作為研究內(nèi)容,拓展了社會智庫研究的內(nèi)容與方向。2、本文綜合運用文獻研究法、問卷調(diào)查法、層次分析法和模糊綜合評價法等多種研究方法,創(chuàng)造性地構(gòu)建了我國社會智庫有效性的評價指標體系,該體系對我國社會智庫總體有效性的評價具有現(xiàn)實的實用價值。3、本文運用構(gòu)建的有效性評價指標體系對我國社會智庫的總體有效性進行了評價,得出了具體的評價結(jié)果,并根據(jù)總體評價結(jié)果,從管理方面、影響力方面、多元化方面、創(chuàng)新方面和政府方面給出了針對性的有效性提升策略,研究成果具有較強的實用性和創(chuàng)新性。
[Abstract]:The social think tank is an important part of the new type think tank in our country, and it is also an important supplement and helper in our country's internal think tank. As a self financing, independent, and neutral non institutional research institution, the social think tank is playing a more and more important role with its unique advantages. At present, the library has common problems of low influence and recognition, poor independence, poor management level, unstable source of funds and weak innovation ability. This paper holds that the above problems existing in our social think tank can be attributed to the problem of effectiveness, that is, the effectiveness of the social intelligence pool is insufficient. In order to improve the core competitiveness and survival ability of the social think tank, the effectiveness of the social think tank should be first promoted. Therefore, the study of the effectiveness of the social think tank in our country can not only make up for the shortage of the existing literature on the think tank, but also provide a scientific reference for the effective development of the social think tank in China. Through the literature research and analysis, this paper defines the related concepts and contents, and analyzes the influencing factors of the effectiveness of our social think tank through interviews and questionnaires, and summarizes the key factors that affect the effectiveness of the social think tank in China, including the key factors including management. Four aspects, such as influence, diversification and innovation. Then, the key factors of the four aspects are refined and decomposed to form sixteen concrete and measurable indicators. Among them, the management includes four indicators such as strategic management, organizational structure management, system management and fund management, and the influence includes high-level influence and academic influence. There are four indicators of influence, media influence and international influence, including diversification of service mode, diversification of funding sources, diversification of performance assessment and diversification of risk control, including four indicators, such as information level, intellectual property protection, human knowledge level and innovation environment and atmosphere. On this basis, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of the effectiveness of China's social think tank, consisting of four first level indicators and sixteen two level indicators. Then, this paper uses the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of each index system of the effectiveness evaluation index system of the social think tank in China, including the first grade and the weight of the two level index. The weight of the standard is in turn influence, innovation, diversification and management, and the weight value of the influence is high, which is close to the sum of the other three index weights. After determining the weight, this paper evaluates the effectiveness of our social think tank by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and obtains the specific evaluation value. Through the evaluation, we can see that, The overall effectiveness level of the national social think tank is not high, it is located between the general and the better, and there is a greater promotion space. Finally, this paper, in combination with the evaluation results of the effectiveness of our social think tank, gives the strategy of improving the effectiveness of the social think tank from four aspects, such as management, influence, diversification and innovation. In addition, as the political environment is one of the key factors affecting the effectiveness of the social think tank in China, the social think tank, as a non institutional think tank, is greatly influenced by the degree of approval and policy of the government. Therefore, this paper also gives the measures and Countermeasures to improve the effectiveness of our social think tank from the government. Now: 1, there is no relevant literature or research content about the effectiveness of the social think tank. This article extends the content and direction of the research of the social think tank as the content of the study of the social think tank in China. This paper uses the literature research method, the questionnaire survey method, the analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and so on. In this way, the evaluation index system of the effectiveness of the social think tank in China is creatively constructed. The system has practical practical value.3 for the evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the social think tank in China. This paper evaluates the overall effectiveness of the social think tank in China by using the constructed effectiveness evaluation index system and obtains the specific evaluation results. And according to the overall evaluation results, from the management, influence, diversification, innovation and government aspects of effective promotion strategy, the research results have strong practicality and innovation.
【學位授予單位】:中國科學技術(shù)大學
【學位級別】:博士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:C932
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條
1 孔月明;中國特色新型智庫建設(shè)存在的突出問題及其發(fā)展路徑[D];中共遼寧省委黨校;2017年
2 楊麗鵬;山西發(fā)展(網(wǎng)絡(luò))智庫現(xiàn)狀及對策研究[D];青島大學;2017年
3 杜成龍;地級市科技智庫建設(shè)研究[D];青島大學;2017年
,本文編號:2039945
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2039945.html
最近更新
教材專著