發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-16 21:34

  本文選題：績(jī)效考評(píng) + 市直部門��； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：政府績(jī)效考評(píng)作為一種創(chuàng)新型的政府管理工具,具有指導(dǎo)、規(guī)范和監(jiān)督功能,能夠促進(jìn)政府績(jī)效水平的提高,為促進(jìn)我國(guó)政府組織管理能力建設(shè)創(chuàng)造動(dòng)力。2000年以來(lái),我國(guó)政府績(jī)效考評(píng)研究已日漸成熟和完善,考評(píng)主體開(kāi)始注重多元化,考評(píng)指標(biāo)體系也不斷完善,實(shí)現(xiàn)了考評(píng)工具和考評(píng)手段的創(chuàng)新。同時(shí),一些城市也紛紛探索了符合當(dāng)?shù)貙?shí)際的績(jī)效考評(píng)模式,成效比較顯著,為增強(qiáng)政府活力創(chuàng)造了條件。長(zhǎng)春市人民政府對(duì)績(jī)效考評(píng)的實(shí)踐探索相對(duì)較晚,但發(fā)展速度較快。文章以長(zhǎng)春市市直部門為研究對(duì)象,從市直部門績(jī)效考評(píng)的現(xiàn)狀入手,詳細(xì)分析了市直部門績(jī)效考評(píng)的基本情況,并指出了其在多元主體、考評(píng)機(jī)構(gòu)、考評(píng)流程、考評(píng)指標(biāo)體系和考評(píng)結(jié)果運(yùn)用等方面取得了初步的實(shí)踐成效。然而,市直部門績(jī)效考評(píng)依然存在數(shù)據(jù)源欠缺全面、考評(píng)指標(biāo)科學(xué)性仍需加強(qiáng)、社會(huì)評(píng)價(jià)影響力度不夠、考評(píng)過(guò)程不規(guī)范和考評(píng)結(jié)果公開(kāi)程度低的問(wèn)題,產(chǎn)生這些問(wèn)題的原因主要體現(xiàn)在績(jī)效觀念、考評(píng)主體、考評(píng)制度和法制建設(shè)等方面。因此,文章綜合分析了杭州模式、北京模式和廈門思明區(qū)模式的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟示,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了優(yōu)化長(zhǎng)春市市直部門績(jī)效考評(píng)的具體策略,希望長(zhǎng)春市將公共價(jià)值貫穿于績(jī)效考評(píng)的全過(guò)程,兼顧社會(huì)參與和政治支持,從考評(píng)主體、考評(píng)制度和法制建設(shè)三大方面入手,推動(dòng)政府績(jī)效考評(píng)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展,從而為提高長(zhǎng)春市政府的綜合績(jī)效水平奠定基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:As an innovative government management tool, government performance evaluation has the functions of guidance, regulation and supervision, which can promote the improvement of government performance, and create a motive force for promoting the capacity building of government organization management in China since 2000. The research of government performance evaluation in our country has matured and perfected day by day. The main body of evaluation has begun to pay attention to diversification, and the evaluation index system has been improved constantly, which has realized the innovation of evaluation tools and means. At the same time, some cities have also explored the performance evaluation model which is in line with the local reality, and the results are remarkable, creating conditions for strengthening the government vitality. Changchun Municipal people's Government to the performance appraisal practice exploration is relatively late, but the development speed is relatively fast. This article takes Changchun City Department as the research object, starting with the current situation of the performance appraisal of the City Direct Department, analyzes in detail the basic situation of the performance Evaluation of the City Direct Department, and points out the basic situation of the performance Appraisal of the City Direct Department, and points out that it is in the pluralistic subject, the appraisal organization, the appraisal process. The evaluation index system and the application of evaluation results have achieved preliminary practical results. However, there are still some problems such as lack of comprehensive data sources, scientific evaluation index, insufficient impact of social evaluation, non-standard evaluation process and low openness of evaluation results. The main reasons for these problems are performance concept, evaluation subject, appraisal system and legal system. Therefore, the article synthetically analyzes the experience and inspiration of Hangzhou model, Beijing model and Xiamen Siming district model, and then puts forward the concrete strategies to optimize the performance evaluation of Changchun City's direct department. It is hoped that Changchun will run public value through the whole process of performance appraisal, give consideration to social participation and political support, and start from three aspects: the subject of evaluation, the evaluation system and the construction of legal system, so as to promote the sustainable development of government performance appraisal. So as to improve the level of comprehensive performance of Changchun municipal government laid the foundation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D630.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 陳太博;畢新華;;政府績(jī)效管理年終考評(píng)的實(shí)踐與經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2012年12期

2 鄒懷賢;;政府績(jī)效管理中的公民制度化參與——對(duì)杭州市政府綜合考評(píng)實(shí)踐的研究與思考[J];浙江樹(shù)人大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

3 包國(guó)憲;王學(xué)軍;;以公共價(jià)值為基礎(chǔ)的政府績(jī)效治理——源起、架構(gòu)與研究問(wèn)題[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

4 陳雪蓮;;政府績(jī)效管理體制改革的制度環(huán)境和發(fā)展空間——以北京市“三效一創(chuàng)”績(jī)效管理體系為個(gè)案[J];天津行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

5 鄭云峰,卓越;21世紀(jì)行政發(fā)展的新亮點(diǎn)——福建省廈門市思明區(qū)開(kāi)展公共部門績(jī)效評(píng)估的探索[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2003年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 尚虎平;;近十年國(guó)外政府績(jī)效評(píng)估聚焦[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1898490