本文選題：鄉(xiāng)村旅游　切入點：農(nóng)戶　出處：《地理研究》2017年09期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：鄉(xiāng)村旅游開發(fā)不可避免會重構(gòu)人地關(guān)系,對農(nóng)戶、鄉(xiāng)村社區(qū)都會產(chǎn)生重要影響,不同旅游開發(fā)模式直接影響鄉(xiāng)村旅游發(fā)展績效。以三類鄉(xiāng)村旅游地為例,在總結(jié)資源、管理和發(fā)展主體差異的基礎(chǔ)上,發(fā)現(xiàn)其呈現(xiàn)三類模式,各自特征分別表現(xiàn)為社區(qū)集體發(fā)展的民俗體驗、社區(qū)主導(dǎo)的農(nóng)家樂休閑和政府主導(dǎo)的遺址景區(qū)休閑。進而利用可持續(xù)生計框架和旅游效應(yīng)理論,系統(tǒng)分析旅游開發(fā)模式對農(nóng)戶生計變化和社區(qū)的影響。研究表明:三種模式下農(nóng)戶生計策略都由傳統(tǒng)農(nóng)業(yè)生計方式向新型旅游經(jīng)營主導(dǎo)生計轉(zhuǎn)型,農(nóng)戶金融、物質(zhì)、社會資本提升明顯;其資源開發(fā)模式?jīng)Q定農(nóng)戶生計多樣性與務(wù)工選擇,旅游經(jīng)營管理模式影響生計資本變化方向和社區(qū)旅游效應(yīng)差異。其次,通過邏輯回歸模型深入解釋了三種類型旅游開發(fā)模式的影響作用,并給出其影響機理的理論解釋。研究指出三種模式旅游影響途徑都以農(nóng)戶金融、物質(zhì)資本提升、鄉(xiāng)村社會經(jīng)濟發(fā)展主導(dǎo),相比而言,社區(qū)集體運營、農(nóng)戶主導(dǎo)的袁家村模式以"人"為核心,促進了鄉(xiāng)村旅游全面發(fā)展�？傮w來說,資源差異與社區(qū)基礎(chǔ)是農(nóng)戶生計變化、社區(qū)影響的原動力,政府角色、社區(qū)(企業(yè))作用與農(nóng)戶利益是旅游開發(fā)管理的核心,旅游開發(fā)模式中政府有效管理、農(nóng)戶主體地位與外界力量正確介入才能保障鄉(xiāng)村旅游有序進行,促進鄉(xiāng)村社區(qū)發(fā)展與轉(zhuǎn)型。
[Abstract]:The development of rural tourism will inevitably reconstruct the relationship between people and land, which will have an important impact on farmers and rural communities, and different tourism development modes will directly affect the performance of rural tourism development. On the basis of the differences between management and development subjects, it is found that there are three kinds of patterns, each characteristic of which is the folk custom experience of community collective development. Community-led rural recreation and government-led recreation in heritage sites. In turn, the sustainable livelihood framework and tourism effect theory are used. This paper systematically analyzes the impact of tourism development mode on farmers' livelihood changes and communities. The results show that: the three modes of farmers' livelihood strategies are transformed from traditional agricultural livelihood mode to new type tourism management leading livelihood, peasant household finance, material, and so on. The increase of social capital is obvious, the resource development mode determines the diversity of farmers' livelihood and the choice of migrant workers, and the tourism management mode influences the direction of livelihood capital change and the difference of community tourism effect. Through the logical regression model, this paper explains the influence of the three types of tourism development models, and gives a theoretical explanation of their influence mechanism. Rural social and economic development is dominant. In contrast, the pattern of "people" is the core of Yuan Jia Village, which is operated collectively by communities and farmers, which promotes the overall development of rural tourism. In general, the difference between resources and community is the change of farmers' livelihood. The motive force of community influence, the role of government, the role of community (enterprise) and the interests of farmers are the core of tourism development management. In order to ensure the orderly development of rural tourism and promote the development and transformation of rural communities, farmers' main position and outside forces can correctly intervene in order to ensure the orderly development of rural tourism.
【作者單位】： 西北大學(xué)城市與環(huán)境學(xué)院;西北大學(xué)圖書館;
【基金】：國家旅游局“萬名旅游英才計劃”項目(WMYC20151083) 陜西高校人文社會科學(xué)青年英才支持計劃(HSSTP) 湖南省人居環(huán)境學(xué)研究基地開放基金項目(RJ15K02) 陜西省自然科學(xué)基礎(chǔ)研究計劃面上項目(2014JM5205)
【分類號】：F327;F592.7

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 宋河有;李文杰;劉正鼎;;城郊地區(qū)采摘旅游開發(fā)模式研究[J];青島農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年04期

2 陳輝;顧巖;;基于國民旅游休閑體系建立下的遼寧省森林旅游開發(fā)模式探討[J];內(nèi)蒙古林業(yè)調(diào)查設(shè)計;2014年01期

3 周永廣;江一帆;陳鼎文;;中國山村旅游開發(fā)模式探索——以浙江省遂昌縣“公社模式”為例[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟問題;2011年11期

4 劉旭玲;;高科技農(nóng)業(yè)生態(tài)園旅游開發(fā)模式探討——以新疆兵團中國彩棉科技園為例[J];科技視界;2013年01期

5 吳莎;;貴州茶生態(tài)旅游開發(fā)模式探究——以鳳岡茶旅游開發(fā)為例[J];旅游縱覽(行業(yè)版);2012年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 記者 徐淳;我市實施農(nóng)業(yè)農(nóng)村“十大工程”[N];南昌日報;2012年

2 本報記者 黃曉慧;城鎮(zhèn)化，，不要急著脫離鄉(xiāng)土[N];人民日報;2013年

本文編號：1647630