本文選題：合作社規(guī)范　切入點(diǎn)：民主管理　出處：《華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：農(nóng)民合作社是帶動農(nóng)戶進(jìn)入市場的基本主體,既是發(fā)展農(nóng)村集體經(jīng)濟(jì)的新型實(shí)體,又是創(chuàng)新農(nóng)村社會管理的有效載體。隨著中央和地方政府對農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社扶持力度的增加,中國的農(nóng)村合作事業(yè)發(fā)展速度不斷加快。然而,我國農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社在迅速發(fā)展壯大的同時(shí),依然存在許多問題。飽受詬病的問題之一就是合作社運(yùn)行不規(guī)范。農(nóng)民合作社既要服務(wù)于社員,又要爭取市場成功。市場成功即意味著合作社要有較好經(jīng)濟(jì)績效。那么服務(wù)于社員和爭取市場成功有無沖突呢?規(guī)范性強(qiáng)的合作社的經(jīng)濟(jì)績效是否更高呢?因此,本文將致力于探索合作社規(guī)范程度與合作社經(jīng)濟(jì)績效之間的理論關(guān)系并加以實(shí)證。目前學(xué)界對合作社規(guī)范的研究大多停留在制度層面,探討合作社規(guī)范失效的現(xiàn)狀、原因、后果和解決方案,但缺乏對合作社規(guī)范性的量化研究,不能從實(shí)證的角度做出說服力強(qiáng)的解釋。因此,本文將對合作社規(guī)范程度進(jìn)行量化,擬通過實(shí)證研究來探討合作社規(guī)范程度與經(jīng)濟(jì)績效的關(guān)系。由于目前缺乏合作社規(guī)范程度的統(tǒng)一標(biāo)準(zhǔn),本文將借鑒《國家農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社示范社評定及監(jiān)測暫行辦法》的相關(guān)內(nèi)容,從中提取民主管理、服務(wù)成效、產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量及社會聲譽(yù)四個(gè)方面作為合作社規(guī)范的評判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)�？紤]到合作社的社會屬性對公平的追求,且“民主管理”與合作社的社會屬性聯(lián)系得較為密切,本論文假設(shè)組織公平氛圍在民主管理與合作社經(jīng)濟(jì)績效之間的關(guān)系中起中介作用,構(gòu)建合作社規(guī)范程度對合作社經(jīng)濟(jì)績效產(chǎn)生影響的理論模型。通過對湖北、江西、山東三省18個(gè)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)的127家農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社的社長及其376名社員的調(diào)研,最終獲得114份有效社長問卷及352份有效社員問卷,并借鑒溫忠麟等提出的中介效應(yīng)檢驗(yàn)程序?qū)碚撃Ｐ瓦M(jìn)行檢驗(yàn),通過實(shí)證分析得出本論文的研究結(jié)論。實(shí)證研究發(fā)現(xiàn),合作社規(guī)范正向影響合作社經(jīng)濟(jì)績效,其中服務(wù)成效、產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量和社會聲譽(yù)直接影響合作社經(jīng)濟(jì)績效,民主管理則通過組織公平氛圍間接影響合作社經(jīng)濟(jì)績效。基于研究結(jié)論,本文提出了政府、合作社管理者以及社員如何參與合作社規(guī)范建設(shè)的建議:政府應(yīng)當(dāng)完善合作社規(guī)范相關(guān)法律的立法及監(jiān)督實(shí)施,并加強(qiáng)合作社相關(guān)知識的宣傳及普及力度;合作社管理者應(yīng)正視合作社的規(guī)范運(yùn)行,依法完善合作社社內(nèi)的民主管理和財(cái)政管理等制度,同時(shí)加強(qiáng)合作社社內(nèi)公平氛圍的建設(shè);社員應(yīng)知法懂法,主動訴求其權(quán)利,積極創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)造,以個(gè)人效益帶動集體效益。
[Abstract]:Farmers' cooperative is the basic subject to drive farmers into the market. It is not only a new entity for developing rural collective economy, but also an effective carrier for innovating rural social management. The pace of development of rural cooperative undertakings in China has been accelerating. However, while the farmers' specialized cooperatives in China are growing rapidly, There are still many problems. One of the problems that has been criticized is the irregular operation of cooperatives. Farmers' cooperatives must serve their members. The success of the market means that the cooperative should have better economic performance. Is there any conflict between serving the members and striving for the success of the market? Is the economic performance of the highly regulated cooperatives higher? Therefore, this paper will focus on exploring the theoretical relationship between the cooperative normative degree and cooperative economic performance, and make an empirical study. At present, the academic research on cooperative norms mostly stays at the institutional level, and discusses the current situation of cooperative norms failure. The reasons, consequences and solutions, but the lack of quantitative research on cooperative norms, can not make a convincing explanation from the perspective of empirical. Therefore, this paper will quantify the degree of cooperative norms, This paper intends to explore the relationship between cooperative normative degree and economic performance through empirical research. This paper will draw lessons from the relevant contents of the interim measures on Evaluation and Monitoring of the National Farmers' Professional Cooperatives, so as to extract democratic management and service effectiveness. The four aspects of product quality and social reputation are used as criteria for evaluating cooperative norms. Considering the social attributes of cooperatives and the pursuit of equity, "democratic management" is closely related to the social attributes of cooperatives. This paper assumes that the organizational fair atmosphere plays an intermediary role in the relationship between democratic management and cooperative economic performance, and constructs a theoretical model of the influence of cooperative normative degree on cooperative economic performance. The investigation of 127 farmers' professional cooperatives in 18 villages and towns in three provinces of Shandong Province and their 376 members resulted in 114 valid president questionnaires and 352 valid member questionnaires. Using Wen Zhonglin's intermediary effect test procedure for reference to test the theoretical model, the conclusion of this paper is drawn by empirical analysis. The empirical study shows that cooperative norms positively affect cooperative economic performance, including the effectiveness of service. Product quality and social reputation directly affect cooperative economic performance, while democratic management indirectly affects cooperative economic performance through organizational equity atmosphere. Suggestions on how to participate in the cooperative norm construction: the government should perfect the legislation and supervise the implementation of the cooperative law, and strengthen the propaganda and popularization of the cooperative related knowledge; Cooperative managers should face squarely the normal operation of cooperatives, perfect the system of democratic management and financial management in cooperative societies according to law, at the same time strengthen the construction of fair atmosphere in cooperative cooperatives, and members should know and understand the law and take the initiative to claim their rights, Actively innovate and create, with individual benefit drive collective benefit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F321.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王真;張斌;;中國農(nóng)民合作社規(guī)范失效研究評述[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年08期

2 婁鋒;程士國;樊啟;;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社績效評價(jià)及績效影響因素[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2016年02期

3 胡明霞;胡耘通;黃勝忠;;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社規(guī)范運(yùn)行的監(jiān)管機(jī)制探析[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年06期

4 王文麗;尉京紅;周寧;;農(nóng)民合作社的社會績效評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系探討——基于“三農(nóng)”視角[J];黑龍江畜牧獸醫(yī);2015年06期

5 張征華;馬銳;;我國農(nóng)民合作社的績效評價(jià)研究綜述[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2015年02期

6 房桂芝;;合作社規(guī)范失效分析[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年12期

7 張漢鵬;李文勇;高春燕;王秀國;;團(tuán)隊(duì)層面凝聚力對公平氛圍—研發(fā)績效關(guān)系的中介作用分析[J];研究與發(fā)展管理;2014年04期

8 鄧衡山;王文爛;;合作社的本質(zhì)規(guī)定與現(xiàn)實(shí)檢視——中國到底有沒有真正的農(nóng)民合作社?[J];中國農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年07期

9 溫忠麟;葉寶娟;;中介效應(yīng)分析:方法和模型發(fā)展[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2014年05期

10 馮小;;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社制度異化的鄉(xiāng)土邏輯——以“合作社包裝下鄉(xiāng)資本”為例[J];中國農(nóng)村觀察;2014年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙佳榮;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社：績效及組織、環(huán)境改進(jìn)[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王琦瓏;道德型領(lǐng)導(dǎo)對團(tuán)隊(duì)績效的影響[D];江西師范大學(xué);2014年

2 劉葉愛;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社營運(yùn)績效及其影響因素研究[D];福建農(nóng)林大學(xué);2012年

3 侍進(jìn)敏;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社績效評價(jià)研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2010年

4 潘克定;農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社運(yùn)行績效與影響因素研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1628366