本文選題：協(xié)商民主　切入點：選舉民主　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：處理好選舉民主與協(xié)商民主之間的關(guān)系是當(dāng)前我國政治民主化建設(shè)中的焦點問題,也是影響我國民主政治發(fā)展未來的關(guān)鍵問題。這其中,地方黨政官員對于兩種民主形式地位與關(guān)系的態(tài)度尚未得到關(guān)注。地方黨政官員是中央各項方針和政策的主要執(zhí)行者,是直面管理與服務(wù)對象的重要管理者,同時也是我國社會治理的核心力量。他們對兩種民主形式地位與關(guān)系的認(rèn)知無疑深刻影響中央層面政策在地方與基層的貫徹與執(zhí)行,進而影響我國民主政治建設(shè)在地方層面取得全面進展。因此,有必要對這一問題予以必要的研究。本文主要關(guān)注于我國地方黨政官員對于兩種民主形式地位與關(guān)系的認(rèn)知狀況以及造成民主認(rèn)知差異的主要因素。為得出研究結(jié)論,本文借助已有調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù),綜合采用文獻研究法與量化研究法開展研究。在研究過程中,以已有文獻研究為基礎(chǔ)設(shè)計分析框架并提出如下研究假設(shè),假設(shè)1:將選舉理解為民主本質(zhì)的地方黨政官員更傾向于認(rèn)為選舉民主更為重要;假設(shè)2:對協(xié)商實踐績效評價更高的地方黨政官員更傾向于認(rèn)為協(xié)商民主更為重要;假設(shè)3:對協(xié)商實踐滿意度更高的地方黨政官員更傾向于認(rèn)為協(xié)商民主更為重要;假設(shè)4:"權(quán)威"接受度更高的黨政官員更加認(rèn)同于協(xié)商民主與選舉民主在我國具有相同重要的地位。隨后,本文通過描述性統(tǒng)計分析以及相關(guān)性檢驗,對我國地方黨政官員對于兩種民主形式地位與關(guān)系的認(rèn)知及造成認(rèn)知差異的影響因素進行了探討,驗證了假設(shè)1、假設(shè)2、假設(shè)3,并發(fā)現(xiàn)性別因素對于地方黨政官員的民主認(rèn)知會也造成一定影響。根據(jù)以上分析與檢驗過程,本論文得出如下研究結(jié)論,地方黨政官員普遍認(rèn)同于選舉與協(xié)商均是我國民主制度的重要內(nèi)容,但就兩種民主形式誰更重要存在觀點差異。選舉民主與協(xié)商民主在我國民主政治建設(shè)中處于同樣重要的地位成為官員態(tài)度中的主流;持有選舉民主觀(認(rèn)同選舉是民主的本質(zhì))的地方黨政官員更加傾向于認(rèn)為選舉民主更加重要;對協(xié)商民主實踐績效評價更高或者滿意度更高的地方黨政官員更加傾向于認(rèn)為協(xié)商民主更加重要;女性地方黨政官員對于協(xié)商民主與選舉民主在我國民主政治建設(shè)中處于相同重要的地位有更高的認(rèn)同度。最后,結(jié)合以上結(jié)論,本論文提出了推進協(xié)商民主與選舉民主在我國民主政治建設(shè)中協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實策略:確立中國特色民主觀;改進民主觀念宣教工作方法;完善民主制度體系并規(guī)范運作機制;注重對女性官員群體民主潛能的開發(fā);形成統(tǒng)一的民主發(fā)展路線共識。
[Abstract]:Properly handling the relationship between electoral democracy and deliberative democracy is a focus issue in the construction of political democratization in our country, and also a key issue affecting the future development of democratic politics in our country. The attitude of local party and government officials on the status and relationship between the two forms of democracy has not yet been paid attention to. Local party and government officials are the main executors of various policies and policies of the central government, as well as the important managers who face up to the targets of management and service. At the same time, they are also the core forces of social governance in our country. Their understanding of the status and relationship of the two forms of democracy undoubtedly profoundly affects the implementation and implementation of policies at the central level at the local and grass-roots levels. Thus affecting the overall progress in the construction of democratic politics in our country at the local level. It is necessary to make a necessary study on this issue. This paper mainly focuses on the cognition of local party and government officials about the status and relationship of the two forms of democracy and the main factors that cause the difference of democratic cognition. In this paper, the literature research method and the quantitative research method are used to carry out the research with the help of the existing survey data. In the course of the research, the analytical framework is designed based on the existing literature research and the following research hypotheses are put forward. Assumption 1: local party and government officials who regard election as the essence of democracy tend to think that electoral democracy is more important, hypothesis 2: local party and government officials with higher performance evaluation of consultation practice tend to think that consultative democracy is more important; Hypothesis 3: local party and government officials with higher satisfaction with consultation practice tend to think that consultative democracy is more important; Hypothesis 4: party and government officials with higher acceptance of "authority" agree that deliberative democracy and electoral democracy have the same important status in our country. Subsequently, through descriptive statistical analysis and correlation test, This paper probes into the cognition of the status and relationship between the two forms of democracy among local party and government officials in China and the factors influencing the cognitive differences. Hypothesis 1, hypothesis 2, hypothesis 3, and it is found that gender factors also affect the democratic cognition of local party and government officials. Based on the above analysis and test process, this paper draws the following conclusions. Local party and government officials generally agree that elections and consultations are important contents of our democratic system. However, there are differences of views on who is more important in the two forms of democracy. Electoral democracy and consultative democracy have become the mainstream of the attitude of officials in the construction of democratic politics in our country in the same important position; Local party and government officials who hold the view of electoral democracy (who agree that election is the essence of democracy) tend to think that electoral democracy is more important; Local party and government officials with higher performance evaluation or higher satisfaction degree tend to think that consultative democracy is more important; Women local party and government officials have a higher degree of recognition of the equal importance of deliberative democracy and electoral democracy in the construction of democratic politics in China. Finally, combined with the above conclusions, This paper puts forward the realistic strategies to promote the harmonious development of the deliberative democracy and the electoral democracy in the democratic political construction of our country: to establish the democratic view with Chinese characteristics, to improve the methods of propaganda and education of the democratic concept, to perfect the democratic system and to standardize the operating mechanism; Pay attention to the development of democratic potential of female officials group and form a unified consensus of democratic development line.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D630.3;D621.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 小軍;官員形象急需改變[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1620747