我國證監(jiān)會行政法律地位改革比較研究
[Abstract]:Today, when the global economy is highly integrated, the securities market is the place where the large-scale flow of capital flows. The global financial turmoil caused by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis in 2008 clearly demonstrated the importance of securities regulation. In view of this, with the further development of the global economy, the major countries in the world are increasingly aware of the important role of the administrative legal system in the activities of securities supervision. According to the new situation of the securities market, they constantly adjust their securities regulatory system in a timely manner. The securities regulatory model in the world can be divided into two types: government supervision and self-regulation. As major western capitalist countries, the United States, Britain and Germany have a long history, a large scale, a relatively complete regulatory law, a relatively strict system, and are typical. The securities market of our country started relatively late in the late 1990s, it was only in the late 1990s that the administrative legal system of securities supervision was basically established, and the securities supervision system covering the whole country with CSRC as the core was established. After that, various fine adjustments were made continuously. China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) was originally set up to be an independent supervision institution, but limited by the national conditions of our country, CSRC has been unable to give play to the advantages of independent regulatory agencies, resulting in a series of theoretical disharmony and practical embarrassment. To perfect the securities supervision system of our country, we should start with CSRC, and reform its administrative legal status is the key. Only by making clear the administrative legal status of CSRC, can the authority of CSRC be standardized, and the ultimate purpose of restricting CSRC and effectively carrying out market supervision can be achieved. The legal status and function of CSRC should be reformed from two aspects. On the one hand, we should strengthen its independent legal status and prevent the administrative organs from exerting too much influence on it; on the other hand, in order to adapt to the independent supervisory status of CSRC, it is necessary to reconstruct and perfect the functions and powers of CSRC.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D922.1;F832.51
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 柯湘;;中國證監(jiān)會行政處罰機制研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2011年08期
2 劉煥省;;歐盟金融工具市場指令對網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代證券中介的監(jiān)管[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年07期
3 曲少臣;;法律授權(quán)的組織的經(jīng)濟法地位——兼評中國證監(jiān)會的地位[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期
4 王建文;;中國證監(jiān)會的主體屬性與職能定位:解讀與反思[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年12期
5 羅培新;;美國新自由主義金融監(jiān)管路徑失敗的背后——以美國證券監(jiān)管失利的法律與政治成因分析為視角[J];法學(xué)評論;2011年02期
6 孫持明;;從1933年美國證券法看證券市場的自治與監(jiān)管[J];法制與社會;2007年05期
7 徐冬根;劉麗娟;;金融危機與美國證券監(jiān)管體制改革[J];法治研究;2010年04期
8 張曉凌;陳華敏;;美國證券法對衍生交易市場風(fēng)險披露的監(jiān)管及借鑒——以SEC“305規(guī)則”體制的監(jiān)管要求為視角[J];國際金融研究;2006年10期
9 王夏敏;;論德國證券期貨監(jiān)管體系[J];高科技與產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2006年07期
10 謝凌霞;;美國證券交易委員會執(zhí)法體制對我國證券監(jiān)管的啟示[J];廣西金融研究;2008年11期
本文編號:2201552
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/huobilw/2201552.html