【摘要】：自地方政府融資平臺(tái)成立以來，圍繞著它的利弊以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的爭(zhēng)議就從來沒有停止過。尤其是自2008年經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)，中央政府推出四萬億經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激計(jì)劃以來，地方政府融資平臺(tái)被推到了輿論的風(fēng)口浪尖上。面對(duì)著經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)過熱，物價(jià)水平持續(xù)走高，國(guó)際環(huán)境日趨復(fù)雜的現(xiàn)狀，2010年以來，中央政府先后出臺(tái)《國(guó)務(wù)院關(guān)于加強(qiáng)地方政府融資平臺(tái)管理有關(guān)問題的通知》（國(guó)發(fā)[2010]19號(hào)文）、《關(guān)于貫徹國(guó)務(wù)院關(guān)于加強(qiáng)地方政府融資平臺(tái)公司管理有關(guān)問題的通知相關(guān)事項(xiàng)的通知》（財(cái)預(yù)[2010]412號(hào)文）、《2011年地方政府自行發(fā)債試點(diǎn)辦法》等文件，對(duì)政府融資平臺(tái)的規(guī)范發(fā)展制定法律依據(jù)，同時(shí)審計(jì)署也進(jìn)行了為期三個(gè)月的徹底排查。 本文旨在通過對(duì)地方政府融資平臺(tái)資金的來源和去向的分析，明確地方政府融資平臺(tái)的現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展模式，把握整個(gè)融資投資活動(dòng)運(yùn)作過程中可能面臨的問題，并據(jù)此提出合理化的政策建議，從規(guī)范地方政府負(fù)債的各個(gè)主體出發(fā)，化解和防范可能出現(xiàn)的各種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。本文希望能夠?qū)⒄推髽I(yè)活動(dòng)本身的特點(diǎn)與地方政府融資平臺(tái)的發(fā)展階段相結(jié)合，關(guān)注這一問題的最新動(dòng)態(tài)，將地方政府融資平臺(tái)傳統(tǒng)的財(cái)政風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其解決辦法擴(kuò)展到包括緊縮性財(cái)政政策和穩(wěn)健的貨幣政策、房地產(chǎn)和土地的調(diào)控政策、保障房建設(shè)以及國(guó)內(nèi)國(guó)際復(fù)雜的經(jīng)濟(jì)形勢(shì)所帶來的新的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和解決辦法，分別以地方政府融資平臺(tái)這一問題涉及的主體——政府、平臺(tái)公司、商業(yè)銀行等金融機(jī)構(gòu)為起點(diǎn)，，提出政策建議，取得一些有意義的結(jié)果。對(duì)完善政府職能，建立債務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)警機(jī)制，優(yōu)化資源配置，更好地進(jìn)行市政建設(shè)、提供公共服務(wù)，具有巨大的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。
[Abstract]:Since the creation of LGFV, the controversy over its pros and cons and risks has never stopped. Especially since the 2008 economic crisis, the central government launched the 4 trillion stimulus package, local government financing platform has been pushed to the forefront of public opinion. In the face of overheated economic growth, rising prices and increasingly complex international environment, since 2010, The Central Government has successively issued the Circular of the State Council on strengthening the Management of Local Government financing platforms (article 19 of Guofa [2010]), and < on the implementation of the circular of the State Council on strengthening the management of local government financing platform companies. Notice on related matters. (article 412 of Financial Prep. [2010]), "pilot measures for Local governments to issue debt by themselves in 2011", and other documents, A legal basis for the normative development of government financing platforms was established, and the Audit Office conducted a three-month thorough investigation. The purpose of this paper is to make clear the current situation and development mode of local government financing platform by analyzing the source and direction of local government financing platform, and to grasp the problems that may be faced in the whole process of financing investment. On the basis of this, some rational policy suggestions are put forward to resolve and prevent the possible risks from standardizing the main bodies of local government liabilities. This paper hopes to be able to combine the characteristics of government and enterprise activities with the development stage of local government financing platform, and pay attention to the latest developments of this issue. Extending the traditional fiscal risks and financial risks of local government financing platforms and their solutions to include contractionary fiscal policies and sound monetary policies, real estate and land regulation policies, The new risks and solutions brought about by the construction of indemnificatory apartment and the complicated domestic and international economic situation are based on the financial institutions such as the government, platform companies, commercial banks and other financial institutions involved in the local government financing platform, respectively. Put forward policy suggestions and get some meaningful results. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to perfect the government function, establish the early warning mechanism of debt risk, optimize the allocation of resources, better carry out municipal construction and provide public services.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林毅夫,劉志強(qiáng);中國(guó)的財(cái)政分權(quán)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

2 劉煜輝;張櫸成;;中國(guó)地方政府融資平臺(tái)分析[J];銀行家;2010年06期

3 中國(guó)工商銀行城市金融研究所課題組;羅煜;王祺;;商業(yè)銀行拓展地方政府融資平臺(tái)業(yè)務(wù)的前景與策略[J];金融論壇;2010年05期

4 宋德潤(rùn);;地方融資平臺(tái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制模型[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年09期

5 陳柳欽;;規(guī)范地方政府融資平臺(tái)發(fā)展的思考[J];地方財(cái)政研究;2010年11期

6 盧家昌;殷曉穎;周慧君;;地方政府市政債券融資的創(chuàng)新機(jī)制研究[J];南方金融;2009年04期

7 馬雪彬;陳嬌;;地方政府融資平臺(tái)、或有負(fù)債與財(cái)政風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];廣西財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

8 張莉;;地方政府債務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)初探——基于分稅制和地方政府融資平臺(tái)的研究[J];環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟(jì)w

本文編號(hào)：2195777