本文關(guān)鍵詞： 環(huán)境管制 FDI細分 “污染避難所假說” 區(qū)域差異　出處：《南方經(jīng)濟》2010年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：本文將外商投資企業(yè)(FDI)細分為合資企業(yè)、合作企業(yè)和獨資企業(yè)三種形式后,利用省際面板數(shù)據(jù)重新審視了地方環(huán)境管制水平對FDI區(qū)位選擇的影響及其區(qū)域差異,并基于風險偏好的視角對以上發(fā)現(xiàn)進行了分析。研究顯示,不同類型FDI進行區(qū)位選擇時對環(huán)境管制的偏好有別,其中合作企業(yè)偏好環(huán)境管制標準較高的省份,獨資企業(yè)則相反,合資企業(yè)介乎二者之間。另外,FDI對地方環(huán)境管制水平的偏好也存在明顯的區(qū)域差異,東部環(huán)境管制水平較高的省份更容易引進FDI,而在"獨資化"比例逐步加大的趨勢下,中西部地區(qū)要警惕成為部分FDI(尤其是獨資企業(yè))的"污染避難所"。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the foreign investment enterprise (FDI) is divided into three forms: joint venture, cooperative enterprise and sole proprietorship enterprise. By using inter-provincial panel data, the influence of local environmental control level on the location choice of FDI and its regional differences are re-examined. The research shows that different types of FDI have different preferences for environmental regulation when they choose location, and the cooperative enterprises prefer the provinces with higher environmental control standards, while the sole proprietorship enterprises prefer the opposite. In addition, the preference of FDI to the level of local environmental regulation also has obvious regional differences. The provinces with higher level of environmental regulation in the east are more likely to introduce FDI, while the proportion of "sole proprietorship" is gradually increasing. The Midwest should be wary of becoming a "pollution shelter" for some FDIs, especially sole proprietors.
【作者單位】： 南京大學;江蘇省工商銀行;
【基金】：國家社科基金“中國對外開放的環(huán)境效應(yīng)研究” 國家重點招標社科基金“貫徹落實科學發(fā)展觀與加快轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式研究”資助
【分類號】：F205;F832.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 應(yīng)瑞瑤;周力;;外商直接投資、工業(yè)污染與環(huán)境規(guī)制——基于中國數(shù)據(jù)的計量經(jīng)濟學分析[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2006年01期

2 潘鎮(zhèn);;制度距離與外商直接投資——一項基于中國的經(jīng)驗研究[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2006年06期

3 田東文;焦e，

本文編號：1539481