本文選題：營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn) + 供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理　； 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文將營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)引入供應(yīng)鏈中斷風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究中。目前國(guó)內(nèi)對(duì)于營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)的研究主要集中于條款介紹以及中外保險(xiǎn)制度對(duì)比等,對(duì)于營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)在供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理中的應(yīng)用研究還較少;而對(duì)于供應(yīng)鏈中斷風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理的研究多是運(yùn)營(yíng)策略,如庫(kù)存管理、多源采購(gòu)、后備供應(yīng)以及企業(yè)流程優(yōu)化等,缺少將營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)與供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理相結(jié)合的研究。本文第三章僅考慮供應(yīng)鏈下游制造商購(gòu)買營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)對(duì)自身相關(guān)策略的影響,假設(shè)制造商以企業(yè)的利潤(rùn)損失為投保標(biāo)的,結(jié)合營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)的免賠額、賠償限額等要素,采用EOQ模型分別建立了企業(yè)未發(fā)生中斷、發(fā)生中斷但未購(gòu)買營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)和發(fā)生中斷且購(gòu)買了營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)三種情況下的企業(yè)利潤(rùn)表達(dá)式,分析了營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)策略的應(yīng)用對(duì)企業(yè)庫(kù)存和利潤(rùn)的影響,試圖在企業(yè)由于多訂購(gòu)而產(chǎn)生的庫(kù)存成本、少訂購(gòu)而產(chǎn)生的缺貨成本、受訂購(gòu)次數(shù)影響的固定成本以及發(fā)生中斷而導(dǎo)致的懲罰成本間為企業(yè)的相關(guān)決策找到平衡,得出中斷的發(fā)生使得企業(yè)的庫(kù)存訂購(gòu)量相較于未發(fā)生中斷情況下會(huì)增加,但營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)策略的應(yīng)用降低了增加的幅度。本文第四章將供應(yīng)鏈下游制造商購(gòu)買營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)對(duì)供應(yīng)鏈風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理的影響由單節(jié)點(diǎn)擴(kuò)展至雙節(jié)點(diǎn),考慮簡(jiǎn)單的二級(jí)供應(yīng)鏈(供應(yīng)商和制造商),假設(shè)供應(yīng)商和制造商分散決策,通過(guò)對(duì)比分析未發(fā)生中斷、發(fā)生中斷但未購(gòu)買營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)以及發(fā)生中斷且購(gòu)買了營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)三種情況下制造商的銷售價(jià)格、供應(yīng)商的批發(fā)價(jià)格、市場(chǎng)需求的變化及供應(yīng)商和制造商的利潤(rùn)函數(shù)來(lái)探討營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)對(duì)供應(yīng)鏈決策的影響。得出發(fā)生中斷但未購(gòu)買營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)情況時(shí),制造商的銷售價(jià)格相較于未中斷情況下會(huì)提高,市場(chǎng)需求會(huì)降低,制造商的利潤(rùn)會(huì)降低,制造商采購(gòu)價(jià)格的變化取決于供應(yīng)商的商譽(yù)成本與制造商的缺貨成本之間的關(guān)系,供應(yīng)商的利潤(rùn)變化則取決于供應(yīng)商的生產(chǎn)成本、供應(yīng)商的商譽(yù)成本以及制造商的缺貨成本三者之間的關(guān)系。而在發(fā)生中斷且購(gòu)買了營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)時(shí),制造商的采購(gòu)價(jià)格會(huì)升高,但三種情況下制造商的采購(gòu)價(jià)格的大小關(guān)系取決于供應(yīng)商的商譽(yù)成本與制造商的缺貨成本之間的關(guān)系,三種情況下制造商的銷售價(jià)格的大小關(guān)系取決于供應(yīng)商的生產(chǎn)成本、供應(yīng)商的商譽(yù)成本以及制造商的缺貨成本三者之間的關(guān)系。本文的研究可以增加國(guó)內(nèi)在營(yíng)業(yè)中斷保險(xiǎn)與企業(yè)供應(yīng)鏈中斷風(fēng)險(xiǎn)相結(jié)合的領(lǐng)域的研究成果,為企業(yè)決策者的成本與價(jià)格決策提供參考,提高企業(yè)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理水平。
[Abstract]:This paper introduces business interruption insurance into supply chain interrupt risk management. At present, the domestic research on business interruption insurance mainly focuses on the introduction of terms and the comparison of Chinese and foreign insurance systems, but the application of business interruption insurance in supply chain risk management is still less. But the research of supply chain interruption risk management is mostly operational strategy, such as inventory management, multi-source procurement, backup supply and enterprise process optimization, and lack of research on combining business interruption insurance with supply chain risk management. In the third chapter, we only consider the influence of the business interruption insurance purchased by the downstream manufacturer of the supply chain on their own relevant strategies, assuming that the manufacturer takes the loss of profits of the enterprise as the insured object, combined with the deductible amount of business interruption insurance, the compensation limit and so on. The EOQ model is used to establish the enterprise profit expressions under the conditions of no interruption, no interruption but no business interruption insurance and business interruption insurance. This paper analyzes the influence of the application of the business interruption insurance strategy on the inventory and profit of the enterprise, and attempts to find out the inventory cost caused by the overordering and the shortage cost caused by the small order in the enterprise. The fixed cost affected by the order number and the penalty cost caused by the interruption find a balance for the relevant decision of the enterprise. It is concluded that the occurrence of the interruption makes the inventory order quantity of the enterprise increase compared with the case of no interruption. However, the application of business interruption insurance strategy reduced the increase. In the fourth chapter, we extend the effect of supply chain risk management from single node to double node, and consider simple secondary supply chain (supplier and manufacturer), assuming supplier and manufacturer decentralized decision. Through the comparative analysis of the manufacturer's sales price, the supplier's wholesale price, the business interruption insurance, the manufacturer's sales price and the supplier's wholesale price. The change of market demand and the profit function of suppliers and manufacturers are used to study the influence of business interruption insurance on supply chain decision. It is concluded that when interruptions occur but business interruption insurance is not purchased, the manufacturer's sales price will increase, market demand will decrease, and the manufacturer's profits will decrease, compared with the uninterrupted situation. The change of manufacturer's purchase price depends on the relationship between the supplier's goodwill cost and the manufacturer's shortage cost, and the supplier's profit change depends on the supplier's production cost. The relationship between supplier's goodwill cost and manufacturer's shortage cost. However, the manufacturer's purchase price will rise when the interruption occurs and the business interruption insurance is purchased. However, the relationship between the manufacturer's purchase price and the supplier's goodwill cost depends on the manufacturer's out-of-stock cost in three cases. The relationship between the manufacturer's selling price and the supplier's production cost, the supplier's goodwill cost and the manufacturer's shortage cost depends on the three situations. The research in this paper can increase the domestic research results in the field of the combination of business interruption insurance and supply chain interruption risk, provide a reference for the cost and price decision of enterprise decision makers, and improve the risk management level of enterprises.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F274;F842.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1953567