本文選題：可靠性 + 制造型質(zhì)量鏈　； 參考：《安徽工程大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：市場競爭歸根到底是供應(yīng)鏈之間的競爭。而在供應(yīng)鏈的運(yùn)作過程中,產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量在很大程度上影響供應(yīng)鏈的有效運(yùn)作,于是便形成了一條以產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量為中心的質(zhì)量鏈。目前全球產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量問題不斷,如一系列的“毒奶粉”風(fēng)波、“汽車召回”、“食品安全”問題事件等等,引起了世界范圍內(nèi)對產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量的關(guān)注。如今,各個國家和地區(qū)都提出要高度重視產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量和服務(wù)質(zhì)量,并且正在紛紛努力尋找提高產(chǎn)品、服務(wù)質(zhì)量和不斷滿足顧客期望要求的有效途徑。 質(zhì)量鏈管理模式基于供應(yīng)鏈的運(yùn)作模式,目前仍處于發(fā)展的初級階段。供應(yīng)鏈中的質(zhì)量管理仍是基于成員企業(yè)內(nèi)部質(zhì)量鏈管理,外部質(zhì)量鏈管理是一種拋過墻式的管理,質(zhì)量在成員企業(yè)間的傳導(dǎo)與影響較少考慮。基于這種運(yùn)作模式,一旦供應(yīng)鏈上游的某個環(huán)節(jié)出現(xiàn)質(zhì)量問題或者是某個環(huán)節(jié)出現(xiàn)偏差,那么很可能會導(dǎo)致下游環(huán)節(jié)出現(xiàn)嚴(yán)重的質(zhì)量問題,最終會導(dǎo)致整條質(zhì)量鏈的失效,形成質(zhì)量鏈上的“反牛鞭效應(yīng)”。質(zhì)量鏈的失效會帶來相應(yīng)的供應(yīng)鏈運(yùn)作風(fēng)險,因此質(zhì)量鏈?zhǔn)Х治龊惋L(fēng)險研究也就成為供應(yīng)鏈運(yùn)作的一個關(guān)鍵問題。質(zhì)量鏈中任何一方出現(xiàn)質(zhì)量問題,均會導(dǎo)致整條質(zhì)量鏈的崩潰。而一旦組織的質(zhì)量鏈中斷并且這種情況為公眾所知,供應(yīng)鏈中的核心企業(yè)及供應(yīng)鏈各成員的聲譽(yù)和經(jīng)營業(yè)績將會受到嚴(yán)重的影響。 目前國內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)界和實業(yè)界已開展了一些關(guān)于質(zhì)量鏈的失效分析與風(fēng)險評價方面的研究。關(guān)于失效分析的研究,較多的是借助于可靠性理論中的一些失效分析工具來對產(chǎn)品的失效模式及危害度的分析,基于危害度實施失效防范,近年來也拓展到供應(yīng)鏈的失效分析中,且失效分析的研究突出產(chǎn)品功能的失效,較少涉及產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量形成過程的失效。關(guān)于風(fēng)險管理的研究,主要基于某一特定場景,從風(fēng)險的構(gòu)成、評價基礎(chǔ)的預(yù)警及防范展開,尚未進(jìn)一步針對不同失效模式所對應(yīng)的風(fēng)險不同來預(yù)警與防范。目前失效分析與風(fēng)險管理的研究是孤立開來而單獨(dú)進(jìn)行,限制了改善作用的發(fā)揮,也是導(dǎo)致失效分析與風(fēng)險管理缺乏有效性的根源。因為系統(tǒng)的某一失效模式會對應(yīng)不同的風(fēng)險等級。為此,為了更好的探討制造型質(zhì)量鏈風(fēng)險產(chǎn)生的機(jī)理,本文將失效分析與風(fēng)險評價兩者相互結(jié)合起來進(jìn)行研究,將核心制造企業(yè)為主導(dǎo)的制造型質(zhì)量鏈為研究對象,首先識別制造型質(zhì)量鏈的失效與風(fēng)險因素,在進(jìn)一步挖掘各失效因素的失效機(jī)理的基礎(chǔ)上,應(yīng)用可靠性工具FMEA并結(jié)合BOM思想構(gòu)建起制造型質(zhì)量鏈?zhǔn)c風(fēng)險一體化指標(biāo)體系；其次在失效模式的基礎(chǔ)上運(yùn)用DEMATEL法對各失效模式及其失效因素進(jìn)行風(fēng)險分析,明確其風(fēng)險等級,并探討與RPN值之間的關(guān)系,通過對風(fēng)險產(chǎn)生機(jī)理的研究來減少系統(tǒng)的失效模式,強(qiáng)調(diào)供應(yīng)鏈中核心制造企業(yè)的產(chǎn)品失效及風(fēng)險問題,得出了不同失效模式對應(yīng)不同危害度和風(fēng)險指數(shù),基于風(fēng)險的失效模式防范路徑比基于危害的失效模式防范更符合運(yùn)作實際的結(jié)論；最后,以一個案例說明該方法的運(yùn)用。運(yùn)用可靠性相關(guān)理論對制造型質(zhì)量鏈?zhǔn)Ｊ椒治龅那疤嵯逻M(jìn)行風(fēng)險等級的劃分,為保證供應(yīng)鏈上產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量的穩(wěn)定性提供一種新的思路。
[Abstract]:In the final analysis, market competition is the competition between supply chains. In the course of the operation of the supply chain, the quality of the product affects the effective operation of the supply chain to a great extent. Therefore, a quality chain centered on the product quality is formed. "Food safety" events, etc., have aroused worldwide attention to the quality of products. Nowadays, countries and regions have proposed to attach great importance to product quality and quality of service, and are trying to find effective ways to improve products, service quality and continuously meet the expectations of customers.
Based on the operation mode of supply chain, quality chain management mode is still in the primary stage of development. Quality management in supply chain is still based on internal quality chain management of member enterprises, and external quality chain management is a kind of throwing over wall management. Quality is less considered in the transmission and influence of member enterprises. Based on this operation mode, There is a quality problem in a certain link upstream of the denier supply chain, or there is a deviation in one link. Then it may lead to a serious quality problem in the lower link, which will eventually lead to the failure of the whole chain of mass and the "anti bullwhip effect" on the quality chain. Quantitative chain failure analysis and risk study also become a key problem in the operation of supply chain. The emergence of quality problems in any one of the quality chains will lead to the collapse of the whole quality chain. Once the organization's quality chain is interrupted and this is known to the public, the reputation and business of the core enterprises and the members of the supply chain in the supply chain The performance will be seriously affected.
At present, the academic and industrial circles at home and abroad have carried out a number of studies on the failure analysis and risk assessment of the quality chain. The research on failure analysis is mainly based on some failure analysis tools in the reliability theory to analyze the failure modes and hazards of the products and to implement the failure prevention based on the hazard degree in recent years. It also extends to the failure analysis of supply chain, and the study of failure analysis highlights the failure of product function, less involved in the failure of product quality formation process. Research on risk management is mainly based on a particular scene, from the composition of risk, the early warning and prevention of the evaluation basis, and has not yet been further aimed at different failure modes. The present study of failure analysis and risk management is isolated and carried out alone, which restricts the effect of improvement and is also the source of the lack of effectiveness in the failure analysis and risk management. In this paper, the mechanism of modeling quality chain risk is discussed. In this paper, the failure analysis and risk assessment are combined to study each other. The manufacturing quality chain which is the leading manufacturing enterprise is the research object. First, the failure and risk factors of the manufacturing quality chain are identified, and the failure mechanism of each failure factor is further excavated. Using the reliability tool FMEA and combining the BOM thought to construct the integration index system of the failure and risk integration of the quality chain, the risk analysis is carried out on the failure modes and their failure factors by using the DEMATEL method on the basis of the failure mode, and the risk level is clearly defined and the relationship between the RPN value and the mechanism of the risk is discussed. In order to reduce the failure mode of the system, it emphasizes the product failure and risk problems of the core manufacturing enterprises in the supply chain, and draws the conclusion that the different failure modes correspond to the different hazards and risk indices. The risk based failure mode prevention path is more operational than the hazard based failure mode. Finally, a case study is made. The application of the method is explained by using the reliability related theory to divide the risk grade on the premise of the analysis of the failure mode of the quality chain of the molding, so as to provide a new way of thinking to ensure the stability of the product quality on the supply chain.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F273.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郗偉東;孫永海;田曉娜;;畜產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量風(fēng)險控制系統(tǒng)架構(gòu)研究與設(shè)計[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2010年24期

2 王彬;唐曉青;;基于知識模型的產(chǎn)品設(shè)計方案失效風(fēng)險評估[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報;2008年07期

3 晚春東;齊二石;索君莉;;供應(yīng)鏈系統(tǒng)運(yùn)行整體風(fēng)險評估指標(biāo)體系[J];工業(yè)工程;2008年05期

4 林強(qiáng);王軼杰;;基于過程能力的供應(yīng)商質(zhì)量風(fēng)險評估[J];工業(yè)工程;2010年03期

5 馬增祥;卓露;從日圓;王麗雪;;淺論彈藥產(chǎn)品失效預(yù)防分析[J];國防技術(shù)基礎(chǔ);2009年12期

6 單汨源;張人龍;;大規(guī)模定制質(zhì)量鏈及其協(xié)同分析[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2009年04期

7 陳國華;張根保;任顯林;趙喜;;基于故障樹分析法的供應(yīng)鏈可靠性診斷方法及仿真研究[J];計算機(jī)集成制造系統(tǒng);2009年10期

8 李守澤;余建軍;孫樹棟;;供應(yīng)鏈?zhǔn)эL(fēng)險識別與評估[J];計算機(jī)應(yīng)用研究;2010年12期

9 陳明;王國華;陳云;陳炳森;;大型復(fù)雜產(chǎn)品失效模式分析[J];機(jī)械設(shè)計;2006年09期

10 李全喜,張欣,王姣;先進(jìn)制造模式下的質(zhì)量鏈管理[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2004年07期

，

本文編號：1830313