【摘要】：隨著寧波城市化進(jìn)程的快速推進(jìn)，城市郊區(qū)土地陸續(xù)被征收，城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部成為城市化、工業(yè)化的主要戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)和重要陣地，原本處于城鄉(xiāng)接合部的新城區(qū)迅速成為拆遷建設(shè)的熱土的同時(shí)，也帶來(lái)了另一“副產(chǎn)品”——違章建筑，并已逐漸成為鄞州區(qū)重點(diǎn)區(qū)塊拆遷建設(shè)的絆腳石。如何有效控違查違、妥善處違問(wèn)題已經(jīng)引起各級(jí)政府的重視。尤其是2013年以來(lái)，浙江省、寧波市兩級(jí)政府推進(jìn)“舊住宅區(qū)改造、舊廠區(qū)改造、城中村改造、拆除違法建筑”（“三改一拆”）三年專項(xiàng)行動(dòng)，下大決心破解空間制約之策、促進(jìn)持續(xù)發(fā)展。在此背景下，本文運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)分析、對(duì)比分析、規(guī)范分析和實(shí)證分析的方法，研究協(xié)同治理機(jī)制下違章建筑的治理之道。 本文第一部分對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外研究的最新成果進(jìn)行歸納梳理，，并對(duì)違章建筑的幾個(gè)概念進(jìn)行區(qū)分；第二部分運(yùn)用公共管理理論中城市治理理論和協(xié)同治理理論，分析了我國(guó)城市治理理論的發(fā)展和協(xié)同治理理論運(yùn)用于服務(wù)性政府的三大主體與四方面內(nèi)容，繼而推出“城管+村委”查違控違模式、“4+1”聯(lián)合執(zhí)法治理模式和參與式社會(huì)化治理模式，并對(duì)三種模型的可行性進(jìn)行一定的評(píng)估；第三部分從城市管理行政執(zhí)法的角度出發(fā)，闡述了鄞州新城區(qū)違章建筑的現(xiàn)狀：違建現(xiàn)象面廣量大點(diǎn)多、違章建筑主體不一、違章建筑形式多樣、違章建筑用途各異，盤(pán)點(diǎn)了四大社會(huì)危害：①踐踏政策，挑戰(zhàn)法律權(quán)威；②破壞環(huán)境，擾亂社會(huì)秩序；③影響拆遷，消耗財(cái)政支出；④滋生事故，存在安全隱患。第四部分深入分析違章建筑產(chǎn)生、蔓延和屢禁不止的原因：①法制觀念淡��；②經(jīng)濟(jì)利益驅(qū)使；③疏通渠道不暢；④基層把關(guān)不嚴(yán)；⑤各方配合不力，并結(jié)合鄞州新城區(qū)違章建筑治理的情況分析當(dāng)前環(huán)境下治理面臨的五個(gè)挑戰(zhàn)：①歷史遺留問(wèn)題多，情況錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜；②為建設(shè)及群眾“剛需”，抵觸情緒強(qiáng)烈；③違建面積小，搭建快，隱蔽性強(qiáng)；④拆違執(zhí)行難，速度慢，效果差；⑤各部門(mén)協(xié)調(diào)性差，處理效率低。第五部分提出了違章建筑治理堅(jiān)持分類處理、有序推進(jìn)、多管齊下、教育與處罰相結(jié)合和集中整治與長(zhǎng)效管理相結(jié)合的五大原則，并提出違章建筑治理的具體措施， 違章建筑的治理不可能一蹴而就，我們考察鄞州新城區(qū)違章建筑及對(duì)其治理工作的現(xiàn)狀，分析違章建筑產(chǎn)生、蔓延的原因，其目的是反思現(xiàn)有的政策存在的問(wèn)題，反思現(xiàn)有的法律法規(guī)體系存在的問(wèn)題，反思在違建整治執(zhí)法中存在的問(wèn)題，希望能為改進(jìn)鄞州新城區(qū)乃至類似的城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合部的違章建筑整治政策，完善相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)體系，規(guī)范執(zhí)法行為，增強(qiáng)違建執(zhí)法的成效提供切實(shí)有效、可操作性強(qiáng)的治理之道。
[Abstract]:With the rapid progress of urbanization in Ningbo, the suburban land has been expropriated one after another, and the urban-rural junction has become the main battlefield and important position of urbanization and industrialization. The new urban area, which was originally located at the junction of urban and rural areas, has quickly become the hot soil for demolition and construction, and at the same time, it has also brought another "by-product"-illegal building, and has gradually become a stumbling block for the demolition and construction of key blocks in Yinzhou District. How to effectively control violations and properly place violations has attracted the attention of governments at all levels. In particular, since 2013, Zhejiang and Ningbo municipal governments have carried out three years of special action to "renovate old residential areas, rebuild old factory areas, rebuild villages in cities, dismantle illegal buildings" ("three changes and one demolition") and make a great determination to crack down on space constraints. Promoting sustainable development In this context, this paper uses the methods of statistical analysis, comparative analysis, normative analysis and empirical analysis to study the governance of illegal buildings under cooperative governance mechanism. The first part of this paper summarizes the latest research results at home and abroad, and distinguishes several concepts of illegal architecture. The second part uses the theory of urban governance and cooperative governance in the theory of public management. This paper analyzes the development of urban governance theory and the application of cooperative governance theory to the three main bodies and four aspects of the service-oriented government, and then puts forward the "urban management village committee" to investigate violations of laws and regulations. The "41" joint law enforcement governance model and participatory socialized governance model, and the feasibility of the three models are evaluated. The third part starts from the perspective of urban management administrative law enforcement. This paper expounds the present situation of illegal building in Yinzhou New District: the phenomenon of illegal building is more extensive, the subject of illegal building is different, the form of illegal building is various, the use of illegal building is different, the trampling policy of four major social hazards: 1 is listed, and the legal authority is challenged; Destroying the environment, disturbing the social order, affecting demolition, consuming financial expenditure and breeding accidents, there are hidden dangers in safety. The fourth part deeply analyzes the causes of the emergence, spread and repeated prohibition of illegal buildings. The reason is that the concept of legal system is weak and the economic interests are weak. Combined with the situation of illegal building management in Yinzhou new urban area, this paper analyzes the five challenges that governance faces under the current environment: 1. There are many problems left over from history. The situation is complex and complex. 2. It is "rigid demand" for construction and the masses, and the resistance is strong and the building area for illegal construction is small. Fast construction, strong concealment, difficult to implement, slow speed, poor effect, poor coordination among departments, low processing efficiency. The fifth part puts forward the five principles of classified treatment, orderly promotion, multi-pronged approach, combination of education and punishment, and combination of centralized regulation and long-term effective management. And put forward the specific measures of illegal building governance, illegal building governance can not be achieved overnight, we investigate the Yinzhou New District illegal building and its governance work status quo, analysis of illegal building causes, spread, Its purpose is to reflect on the problems existing in the existing policies, the existing laws and regulations system, and the problems existing in the enforcement of illegal building regulations. It is hoped that it can provide an effective and operable way for improving the regulation policy of illegal construction in Yinzhou's new urban area and even for the similar urban and rural areas, perfecting the relevant laws and regulations system, standardizing the law enforcement behavior, and enhancing the effectiveness of the illegal building law enforcement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳春英;;新加坡管控違法建筑的七大舉措[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

2 李永清;;香港治理違法搭建的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與內(nèi)地之借鑒[J];上海城市管理;2010年01期

3 周銳波;周素紅;;城鄉(xiāng)結(jié)合地區(qū)違法建設(shè)產(chǎn)生的原因與對(duì)策研究[J];城市規(guī)劃;2007年05期

4 陳振明 ,呂志奎 ,胡薇薇;強(qiáng)化我國(guó)政府社會(huì)管理職能的對(duì)策思考——《“政府社會(huì)管理”課題的研究報(bào)告》之四[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2005年04期

5 陳振明;和經(jīng)緯;;政府工具研究的新進(jìn)展[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2006年06期

6 吳岳方;;吳江市整治違法建筑的思路[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

7 張立榮;冷向明;;協(xié)同治理與我國(guó)公共危機(jī)管理模式創(chuàng)新——基于協(xié)同理論的視角[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

8 魏廣玉;;違法建筑分類治理機(jī)制及對(duì)策研究:以深圳市為例[J];工程管理學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

9 許云峰;淺議城市違章建筑的危害[J];山西建筑;2004年21期

10 張立榮;何水;;公共危機(jī)協(xié)同治理:理論分析與中國(guó)關(guān)懷——社會(huì)資本理論的視角[J];理論與改革;2008年02期

本文編號(hào)：2170400