發(fā)布時間：2018-06-23 11:19

  本文選題：治理主體 + 治理　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)前世界各國都面臨著或大或小的危機(jī)問題，中國也不例外。正處于轉(zhuǎn)型時期的中國，由于眾多不確定因素導(dǎo)致一系列社會公共問題的產(chǎn)生。而這些問題逐漸誘導(dǎo)我國公共危機(jī)爆發(fā)，某些危機(jī)事件或許引發(fā)地區(qū)性甚至全國性的公共危機(jī)，造成不可挽回的損失。傳統(tǒng)的公共危機(jī)治理主體單一的弊端日漸凸顯，多元主體共治逐步成為當(dāng)今公共危機(jī)治理的新模式。一方面作為公共事務(wù)的操作者、公共權(quán)力的執(zhí)行者和集體利益的代表者的政府，在危機(jī)治理過程中不僅積累了豐富的經(jīng)驗，則需要政府在處理危機(jī)事件中起主導(dǎo)作用；另一方面，，由于政府作為治理主體的單一性，存在著一些自身的弊端，當(dāng)非營利組織、社會團(tuán)體等第三部門的建立，非政府組織得到空前的發(fā)展，并積極要求參與到危機(jī)治理的應(yīng)對中去。這些都迫切地要求我們建立健全危機(jī)治理的體制、機(jī)制，實現(xiàn)政府、非政府組織、營利組織、社會公眾、新聞媒體以及國際組織等多元主體的良性互動，共同參與危機(jī)治理之中。 本文探討在經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型、社會轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時期，我國公共危機(jī)治理主體轉(zhuǎn)型的必要性。由于政府能力有限、負(fù)擔(dān)過重，在危機(jī)處理過程中往往顯得力不從心，于是開始由單一政府的治理主體轉(zhuǎn)向多元化。然而轉(zhuǎn)型過程中遇到瓶頸和困難，比如政府危機(jī)處理中信息處理方式，非政府組織發(fā)展受限，社會民眾動員程度不高等等。在治理與善治和協(xié)作性公共管理理論基礎(chǔ)上，借助外國經(jīng)驗為平臺，針對我國危機(jī)治理的現(xiàn)狀提出構(gòu)建公共危機(jī)治理主體多元模式的建議：合理界定治理主體的責(zé)任與義務(wù)；提升政府自身的公共危機(jī)治理能力；發(fā)揮媒體在公共危機(jī)治理中的作用；動員社會力量參與其中；爭取國際援助與國際合作。
[Abstract]:At present, all the countries in the world are faced with large or small crises, and China is no exception. China is in the transition period, because of many uncertain factors leading to a series of social public problems. These problems gradually lead to the outbreak of public crisis in China, some crisis events may lead to regional or even national public crisis, resulting in irreparable losses. The single malpractice of the traditional public crisis governance body is becoming more and more obvious, and the common governance of multiple subjects has gradually become a new mode of public crisis management. On the one hand, as the operator of public affairs, the executor of public power and the representative of collective interests, the government not only accumulated rich experience in the process of crisis management, but also needed the government to play a leading role in dealing with the crisis. On the other hand, due to the singularity of the government as the main body of governance, there are some disadvantages of its own. When the third sector, such as non-profit organizations, social organizations, and other third sectors, is established, non-governmental organizations get unprecedented development. And actively request to participate in the crisis management response to go. All these urgently require us to establish and improve the system and mechanism of crisis management, and to realize the positive interaction among the government, non-governmental organizations, profit-making organizations, the public, the news media and international organizations, and so on. Joint participation in crisis management. This paper discusses the necessity of the transformation of public crisis management subject in the critical period of economic and social transformation. Because of the limited capacity of the government and the heavy burden, it often appears to be unable to cope with the crisis, so it begins to change from the single government's main body of governance to diversification. However, the process of transition encountered bottlenecks and difficulties, such as government crisis management information processing, non-governmental organization development constraints, social mobilization degree is not high, and so on. On the basis of the theories of governance, good governance and cooperative public management, and on the basis of foreign experience, this paper puts forward some suggestions for constructing the multi-mode of public crisis governance subject in view of the present situation of crisis management in China: rationally defining the responsibility and obligation of the main body of governance; To enhance the government's ability to manage public crisis; to play the role of media in public crisis management; to mobilize social forces to participate in it; to seek international assistance and international cooperation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D63

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉國文;危機(jī)管理:西方的經(jīng)驗和中國的任務(wù)[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2003年03期

2 顧林生;日本大城市防災(zāi)應(yīng)急管理體系及其政府能力建設(shè)——以東京的城市危機(jī)管理體系為例[J];城市與減災(zāi);2004年06期

3 高猛;;公共危機(jī)下的政府公共關(guān)系[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2008年04期

4 石奎;危機(jī)管理中非政府組織的作用[J];桂林電子工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期

5 肖鵬英;;當(dāng)代公共危機(jī)管理研究的現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢[J];貴州社會科學(xué);2006年04期

6 賈西津;NGO:擋風(fēng)高墻中的水泥[J];決策;2005年08期

7 史獻(xiàn)芝;;基于治理理論視閾中的公共危機(jī)治理[J];江蘇廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年01期

8 馬小偉;;NGO:我國公共危機(jī)管理的當(dāng)然主體[J];全國商情(經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究);2007年09期

9 劉t ;論信息化時代的公共危機(jī)管理[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期

10 王德迅;日本危機(jī)管理研究[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治;2004年03期

本文編號：2056948