本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國市轄區(qū)政府治理研究　出處：《東北大學(xué)》2013年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 市轄區(qū) 政府治理 市轄區(qū)政府治理 整體性治理

【摘要】：整體性治理理論是繼治理理論產(chǎn)生之后于20世紀(jì)90年代中后期發(fā)展起來的,在一定程度上,整體性治理理論是對傳統(tǒng)治理理論的繼承和發(fā)展。從面臨的問題、支持性條件和理論工具本身的分析力三方面來看,以整體性治理理論分析中國地方政府變革具有較高的適用性。市轄區(qū)政府的運(yùn)行是中國地方政府運(yùn)行的重要一環(huán)。明確改革開放以來,尤其是現(xiàn)階段中國地方政府運(yùn)行所遵循的基本邏輯,有利于為市轄區(qū)政府治理的分析奠定宏觀的基礎(chǔ)�？v向行政發(fā)包與橫向政府間競爭并存,行政性分權(quán)與地方政府橫向集權(quán)并存,實(shí)際運(yùn)行中走向偏頗的官員政績考核機(jī)制與地方政府的自主性并存,強(qiáng)激勵(lì)機(jī)制與弱監(jiān)督機(jī)制并存,這些基本體現(xiàn)了現(xiàn)階段中國地方政府運(yùn)行的基本邏輯�，F(xiàn)階段,市轄區(qū)政府治理中的“權(quán)力碎片化”問題主要體現(xiàn)為市區(qū)兩級政府職能交叉和機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置重疊,及以事權(quán)與財(cái)權(quán)為核心的權(quán)力摩擦。市轄區(qū)政府治理過程中的深層次問題主要是,市轄區(qū)政府治理受地方政府治理基本邏輯的制約,是地方政府治理行政目標(biāo)責(zé)任制、晉升錦標(biāo)賽、壓力型體制及政績考核機(jī)制的參與主體,但是卻不具有獨(dú)立的主體資格。在一定程度上市轄區(qū)政府治理的困境是整體政府治理困境的一個(gè)縮影,假如地方政府治理的基本邏輯沒有根本改變,徒然要求市轄區(qū)轉(zhuǎn)變政府職能是很難做到的�，F(xiàn)有的以政績考核為代表的激勵(lì)機(jī)制使市轄區(qū)政府在經(jīng)營者和管理者兩種角色之間掙扎,其角色定位始終得不到明確。市轄區(qū)政府在職能上回歸公共管理的本位,則不僅其特有的尷尬會得到根本性解決,其與市級政府的權(quán)責(zé)摩擦也將得到大幅度緩解。從整體性治理視野下看待市轄區(qū)政府治理改革,不僅需要在政府管理系統(tǒng)內(nèi)部調(diào)整市區(qū)兩級政府的縱向關(guān)系,加強(qiáng)市轄區(qū)政府內(nèi)部機(jī)構(gòu)整合,也需要建構(gòu)以市轄區(qū)政府為核心、以社會組織與市場機(jī)制為補(bǔ)充的公共治理體系。整體性治理視野和整體性治理的解決方案有利于遠(yuǎn)近兼顧、標(biāo)本兼治,在解決具體問題過程中碎步前行,逐步夯實(shí)公共治理結(jié)構(gòu)的基礎(chǔ),提升公共治理的質(zhì)量。但問題的另一面是,整體性治理的思路,無疑對于政府的理性能力、政策制定能力以及決心和魄力都是一個(gè)巨大的考驗(yàn)。
[Abstract]:Holistic governance theory is developed after the emergence of governance theory in the late 1990s. To a certain extent, holistic governance theory is the inheritance and development of traditional governance theory. From the three aspects of the problems, supporting conditions and theoretical tools, it is of high applicability to analyze China's local government reform based on holistic governance theory. The operation of the government in the municipal district is an important part of the operation of the local government in China. It is clear that since the reform and opening up, especially the basic logic of the operation of local governments in China at this stage, it is conducive to lay a macro foundation for the analysis of governance in the municipal area. The longitudinal and transverse intergovernmental administrative contract competition coexist, administrative decentralization and local government horizontal centralization coexist, the actual operation to biased official performance evaluation system and local government autonomy coexist, coexistence of strong incentive mechanism and weak supervision mechanism, which basically reflects the basic logic at this stage Chinese local government operation. At present, the problem of "fragmentation of power" in municipal governance is mainly reflected in the overlapping of two levels of government functions and institutional settings, and the power friction centered on power and financial power. The deep-seated problems in the process of governance of the borough government is mainly restricted by the district government, governance of local government governance basic logic, are the main participants in the governance of local government administrative responsibility, promotion tournaments, pressure type system and performance evaluation mechanism, but they do not have independent subject qualification. To a certain extent, the dilemma of government governance in the listed area is a microcosm of the overall government governance dilemma. If the basic logic of local government governance has not fundamentally changed, it will be very difficult to transform the functions of the government in vain. The existing incentive mechanism represented by performance appraisal makes the municipal government struggle between the two roles of managers and managers, and its role is always not clear. If the municipal government can return to the standard of public administration, it will not only fundamentally solve its embarrassment, but also greatly alleviate its power and responsibility conflicts with the municipal government. Look at the city government governance reform from a holistic governance perspective, not only in the vertical relationship of the government management system of interior modulation of the two levels of governments, strengthen the municipal districts within government agencies also need to integrate and construct the borough government as the core, the social organization and the market mechanism of the public governance system. The solution of holistic governance perspective and holistic governance is conducive to both near and far, tackling the problem, step forward in solving specific problems in the process of the foundation, to gradually build public governance structure, improve the quality of public governance. But the other side of the problem is that the idea of holistic governance is undoubtedly a great challenge for the government's rational capacity, policy-making ability and determination and courage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱光磊,張志紅;“職責(zé)同構(gòu)”批判[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 劉偉;;論“大部制”改革與構(gòu)建協(xié)同型政府[J];長白學(xué)刊;2008年04期

3 李軍杰;經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型中的地方政府經(jīng)濟(jì)行為變異分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年01期

4 江飛濤;曹建海;;市場失靈還是體制扭曲——重復(fù)建設(shè)形成機(jī)理研究中的爭論、缺陷與新進(jìn)展[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年01期

5 趙成福;;社會轉(zhuǎn)型與當(dāng)代中國服務(wù)型政府的構(gòu)建[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

6 劉君德,張俊芳,馬祖琦;大城市政府職能轉(zhuǎn)變中的區(qū)級政區(qū)功能定位研究[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2002年05期

7 馬祖琦;海峽兩岸大城市市轄區(qū)區(qū)級行政管理體制比較[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2005年02期

8 馬駿,侯一麟;中國省級預(yù)算中的非正式制度:一個(gè)交易費(fèi)用理論框架[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年10期

9 周黎安;;中國地方官員的晉升錦標(biāo)賽模式研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年07期

10 毛壽龍;;中國政府改革的過去與未來[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

，

本文編號：1345486