本文選題：民間智庫(kù) + 國(guó)家治理��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：國(guó)家治理是國(guó)家、社會(huì)以及公民個(gè)人合作治理公共事務(wù)的一種制度和權(quán)力安排,核心在于通過(guò)分權(quán)、讓權(quán)、放權(quán)、賦權(quán)等途徑打破政府單一治理主體對(duì)公共權(quán)力的壟斷,促成國(guó)家權(quán)力回歸社會(huì)。在此過(guò)程中,國(guó)家和社會(huì)通過(guò)制度化的、持續(xù)的互動(dòng)合作過(guò)程實(shí)現(xiàn)公共目標(biāo)和公共利益的最大化。智庫(kù)咨詢機(jī)構(gòu)在國(guó)家治理能力和治理體系現(xiàn)代化過(guò)程中的重要作用得到了政界和學(xué)界的普遍認(rèn)同。我國(guó)智庫(kù)建設(shè)已經(jīng)步入了務(wù)實(shí)合作的全新階段,這也是國(guó)家治理能力提升的關(guān)鍵一步。在此背景下,民間智庫(kù)在中國(guó)特色智庫(kù)格局中的弱勢(shì)地位則難與中國(guó)智庫(kù)整體發(fā)展要求相匹配,當(dāng)務(wù)之急應(yīng)準(zhǔn)確判斷民間智庫(kù)發(fā)展困境,著力提升民間智庫(kù)影響力。本文認(rèn)為民間智庫(kù)影響力指智庫(kù)機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)于政策咨詢、學(xué)術(shù)研究、企業(yè)與社會(huì)發(fā)展以及社會(huì)輿論等的影響能力,其中民間智庫(kù)對(duì)政策決策過(guò)程的影響能力是衡量一個(gè)咨詢機(jī)構(gòu)綜合實(shí)力的核心指標(biāo)。民間智庫(kù)影響力的大小指智庫(kù)能在多大程度上對(duì)政策決策過(guò)程產(chǎn)生影響。民間智庫(kù)具有廣泛的發(fā)展理論背景,治理理論的訴求,服務(wù)型STS理論、知識(shí)市場(chǎng)的興起,都將民間智庫(kù)推上了現(xiàn)代公共政策研究的前沿。結(jié)合民間智庫(kù)代表——北京天則經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)民間智庫(kù)面臨著參與公共決策支持水平低、獨(dú)立性和創(chuàng)新性特征不明顯、缺乏產(chǎn)品營(yíng)銷意識(shí)與渠道、自身組織管理機(jī)制不健全等一系列現(xiàn)實(shí)發(fā)展限度。三權(quán)分立創(chuàng)設(shè)良好政策環(huán)境且慈善傳統(tǒng)發(fā)達(dá)的美國(guó)智庫(kù)、與政黨聯(lián)系密切且注重宣傳推廣的歐洲智庫(kù)都為我國(guó)民間智庫(kù)影響力培育提供了豐富的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟示。提升我國(guó)民間智庫(kù)綜合影響力的路徑可以分為以下幾個(gè)方面:在構(gòu)建中國(guó)特色新型智庫(kù)體系的過(guò)程中,政府進(jìn)行配套改革并完善相關(guān)法律法規(guī),為民間智庫(kù)成長(zhǎng)提供政策法律保障;充分調(diào)動(dòng)人才、資金和關(guān)系等社會(huì)各項(xiàng)要素,為民間智庫(kù)打牢社會(huì)根基;完善民間智庫(kù)影響力測(cè)評(píng)、研究過(guò)程與成果管理、組織管理和營(yíng)銷管理機(jī)制,從內(nèi)部激發(fā)民間智庫(kù)組織的發(fā)展活力。
[Abstract]:State governance is a kind of system and power arrangement for the government, society and individual citizens to manage public affairs in cooperation. The core is to break the monopoly of the public power by the single governance subject of the government through the means of separation of powers, abdication, devolution, empowerment and so on.Promote the return of state power to society.In this process, the state and society achieve the maximization of public objectives and public interests through the process of institutionalized and continuous interaction and cooperation.The important role of think-tank advisory organization in the process of modernization of national governance capacity and governance system has been generally recognized by political and academic circles.China's think-tank construction has entered a new stage of pragmatic cooperation, which is also a key step to improve the national governance capacity.In this context, the weak position of folk think tanks in the pattern of think tanks with Chinese characteristics is difficult to match with the overall development requirements of Chinese think tanks.This paper argues that the influence of private think tanks refers to the ability of think tanks to influence policy advice, academic research, business and social development, and public opinion.Among them, the ability of private think tanks to influence policy decision-making process is the core index to measure the comprehensive strength of an advisory body.The influence of private think tanks refers to the extent to which they can influence the policy-making process.The folk think-tank has the extensive development theory background, the request of the governance theory, the service type STS theory, the rise of the knowledge market, all have pushed the folk think tank to the front of the modern public policy research.Combined with the current development situation of the representative of the non-governmental think-tank, the Beijing Tianze Institute of Economics, we can find that our country's non-governmental think tanks are faced with low level of support for participating in public decision-making, lack of independence and innovative characteristics, and lack of product marketing awareness and channels.Its own organization management mechanism is not perfect and so on a series of realistic development limits.The separation of powers creates American think-tanks with good policy environment and developed philanthropic tradition. European think-tanks, which are closely connected with political parties and pay attention to propaganda and promotion, have provided rich experience and inspiration for the cultivation of the influence of civil think tanks in China.The path to enhance the comprehensive influence of Chinese folk think tanks can be divided into the following aspects: in the process of building a new type of think tank system with Chinese characteristics, the government carries out complementary reforms and consummates the relevant laws and regulations.To provide policy and legal protection for the growth of non-governmental think tanks; to fully mobilize talents, funds and relationships and other social elements, to lay a solid social foundation for non-governmental think tanks; to improve the impact assessment, research process and results management of private think tanks;Organizational management and marketing management mechanism to stimulate the development of non-governmental think-tank organizations from the internal vitality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：C932

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘曄華;;智庫(kù)參與國(guó)家治理的邏輯及效能提升——評(píng)《中國(guó)特色新型智庫(kù)與國(guó)家治理現(xiàn)代化》[J];出版廣角;2016年09期

2 錢(qián)再見(jiàn);;新型智庫(kù)參與公共政策制定的制度化路徑研究——以公共權(quán)力為視角[J];智庫(kù)理論與實(shí)踐;2016年01期

3 劉根;文亞青;;市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷:中國(guó)特色新型智庫(kù)建設(shè)的重要問(wèn)題[J];沿海企業(yè)與科技;2016年01期

4 孫蔚;;國(guó)家治理視野下的中國(guó)特色新型智庫(kù)[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期

5 王莉麗;;論美國(guó)智庫(kù)輿論影響力的形成機(jī)制[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年03期

6 金家厚;;民間智庫(kù)發(fā)展:現(xiàn)狀、邏輯與機(jī)制[J];行政論壇;2014年01期

7 俞可平;;推進(jìn)國(guó)家治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化[J];前線;2014年01期

8 國(guó)務(wù)院發(fā)展研究中心公共管理與人力資源研究所"國(guó)外智庫(kù)管理體系研究"課題組;王佩亨;李國(guó)強(qiáng);田琳琳;煒班;銀純?nèi)?;注重提升影響力的英國(guó)智庫(kù)[J];管理觀察;2013年28期

9 覃愛(ài)玲;;天則:一個(gè)民間智庫(kù)的20年沉浮[J];南風(fēng)窗;2013年11期

10 孫志茹;張志強(qiáng);;基于知識(shí)運(yùn)用理論的學(xué)術(shù)研究政策影響力評(píng)價(jià)框架研究[J];圖書(shū)情報(bào)工作;2013年08期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 ;加強(qiáng)河北新型智庫(kù)建設(shè)[N];河北日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

2 王繼承;;麥甘“全球智庫(kù)報(bào)告”排名機(jī)制及其影響(下)[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2012年

3 雷輝 ;陳燕玲;李小偉;;誰(shuí)在給中央政治局授課？[N];南方日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

4 樊鵬;;公共投資主導(dǎo)的德國(guó)智庫(kù)[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 徐曉虎;地方智庫(kù)的構(gòu)成要素和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1732829