【摘要】：工程項目建設過程中,工程糾紛基本上是不可避免的,由于人們的立場不同,對于工程爭端的認知存在較大的差異,故而容易上升為工程爭端或者工程訴訟。發(fā)生工程爭端后,項目相關(guān)參與方為了應對工程爭端,通常會需要花費大量的爭端費用,而且項目相關(guān)參與方未必能夠贊同工程爭端的裁決結(jié)果,影響了項目的順利實施和雙方的利益。大量的案例和文獻表明,某些因素對于引發(fā)工程爭端起到極為重要的作用,通過建立工程爭端預測模型,預測工程是否會發(fā)生爭端,并針對可能發(fā)生爭端的項目,分析導致工程爭端發(fā)生的主要因素,采取合理有效的管理與控制措施,能夠在一定程度上降低工程爭端發(fā)生的概率和損失。本文搜集和整理工程爭端案例,通過對引起工程爭端的某些主要因素,如業(yè)主和承包商的管理與組織、雙方的關(guān)系價值、項目的規(guī)模與復雜性、資金計劃、合同與風險管理以及項目的范圍定義等,進行分析后,將其歸結(jié)為過程、人員以及項目三類因素,并針對能夠引發(fā)工程爭端的要素設計相應的調(diào)查問卷。利用網(wǎng)絡和現(xiàn)場發(fā)放的形式收集和整理調(diào)查問卷,并對數(shù)據(jù)進行因子分析,提取了9個因子,據(jù)此建立了工程爭端預測模型,并通過實例對工程爭端預測模型進行驗證,模型得到較可靠驗證。工程爭端潛在指數(shù)的模型能夠幫助工程項目管理人員在工程項目開始階段和隨后的履行合同過程中,認識到產(chǎn)生工程爭端的潛在因素,從合同公平和公正的角度,發(fā)現(xiàn)產(chǎn)生爭端的深層次原因,并引導簽約雙方改進約定和建立更和諧的關(guān)系,營造良好的工程實施環(huán)境,達成雙贏的局面。
[Abstract]:In the course of construction of engineering projects, engineering disputes are basically inevitable. Because of different positions of people, there are great differences in cognition of engineering disputes, so it is easy to rise to engineering disputes or engineering litigation. After a project dispute occurs, the project participants usually need to spend a lot of costs in order to deal with the project dispute, and the project participants may not be able to agree with the outcome of the project dispute decision. Affected the smooth implementation of the project and the interests of both sides. A large number of cases and literature have shown that certain factors play a very important role in the initiation of engineering disputes, by establishing a prediction model for engineering disputes, predicting whether a project will occur disputes, and aiming at projects where disputes may arise, By analyzing the main factors leading to the occurrence of engineering disputes and taking reasonable and effective management and control measures, the probability and loss of the occurrence of engineering disputes can be reduced to a certain extent. This paper collects and collates the cases of engineering disputes, through the management and organization of the owners and contractors, the value of the relationship between the two sides, the scale and complexity of the project, the capital plan, and the management and organization of the owners and contractors. Contract and risk management as well as the definition of project scope are analyzed and summarized into three kinds of factors: process, personnel and project. A questionnaire is designed for the factors that can lead to engineering disputes. The questionnaire is collected and sorted out in the form of network and on-the-spot distribution, and nine factors are extracted from the data by factor analysis. Based on this, a project dispute prediction model is established and verified by an example. The model is proved to be reliable. A model of the potential index of engineering disputes can help project managers recognize the underlying factors that give rise to engineering disputes in the initial phase of the project and the subsequent performance of the contract, from the perspective of fairness and fairness of the contract, Find out the deep causes of the dispute, and guide the two parties to improve the agreement and establish a more harmonious relationship, create a good project implementation environment, and achieve a win-win situation.
【學位授予單位】：天津大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU71

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉銳;呂文學;嚴謙;;基于共享心智模型的工程項目知識管理[J];工程管理學報;2014年02期

2 柯洪;呂廷竹;杜亞靈;;基于SEM的工程合同不完備性測度研究[J];北京理工大學學報(社會科學版);2014年02期

3 壽涌毅;車文;彭曉峰;;基于內(nèi)容分析法的大型項目特征研究[J];項目管理技術(shù);2013年06期

4 何清華;羅嵐;陸云波;任俊山;;基于TO視角的項目復雜性測度研究[J];管理工程學報;2013年01期

5 唐海榮;尹貽林;侯春梅;朱成愛;;工程量清單項目特征描述不準確導致結(jié)算糾紛的預控措施研究[J];工程管理學報;2012年05期

6 吳光東;施建剛;唐代中;;工程項目團隊動態(tài)特征、沖突維度與項目成功關(guān)系實證[J];管理工程學報;2012年04期

7 滕延京;宮劍飛;李建民;;基礎(chǔ)工程技術(shù)發(fā)展綜述[J];土木工程學報;2012年05期

8 韓姣杰;周國華;李延來;蔡屹;;基于互惠偏好的多主體參與項目團隊合作行為[J];系統(tǒng)管理學報;2012年01期

9 應志剛;;建筑企業(yè)項目管理創(chuàng)新研究與實踐[J];工程管理學報;2011年04期

10 王雪青;宋研;;基于代建機制的大型項目組織機構(gòu)設計研究[J];項目管理技術(shù);2011年07期

，

本文編號：2463922