發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-21 17:09

【摘要】：現(xiàn)在中國大多數(shù)城市的主要元素之一是筆直開敞的街道，千篇一律的大體量城市住宅自由的散布在公園化的城市空間中。城市空間概念化的地圖中呈現(xiàn)出均勻的質(zhì)感，沒有對比、層級、缺乏組織結(jié)構(gòu)。在城鎮(zhèn)化過程中城市邊緣的許多村落正在消失，拆遷安置小區(qū)的規(guī)劃依舊延續(xù)或者抄襲現(xiàn)代城市規(guī)劃的范本。住宅小區(qū)中具有空間組織秩序的街道及廣場已經(jīng)不復(fù)存在，各個(gè)層級的空間在住宅小區(qū)的樓與樓之間零散的拼湊在一起，空間的層次已經(jīng)消失殆盡。 推進(jìn)新型城鎮(zhèn)化，，不能盲目復(fù)制國外規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)模式，而是要傳承自身的文脈，重塑自身的文化地域特色。沒有自己的文化根基，創(chuàng)造不出自己的特色，自身優(yōu)勢就發(fā)揮不出來，就會(huì)造成千城一面的景象。城鎮(zhèn)化過程中城市邊緣的拆遷安置居住小區(qū)割裂式的設(shè)計(jì)，缺失了很多中國文化和思想內(nèi)涵，這種粗暴的規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)必然隱藏著種種缺陷。安置小區(qū)居民的歸屬感、領(lǐng)域感的缺失不僅僅在物質(zhì)上清晰的表現(xiàn)出來，同樣也表現(xiàn)在精神文化需求上面。 在列斐伏爾看來空間也是可以生產(chǎn)的，空間的生產(chǎn)把物質(zhì)和精神二元的相互對立的兩個(gè)因素結(jié)合起來。空間的生產(chǎn)，不僅僅是物質(zhì)性的生產(chǎn)，也受到文化、慣習(xí)、歷史等因素的影響。在社會(huì)實(shí)踐中布爾迪厄?qū)⒘?xí)性、場域和資本做為相互作用的因素同時(shí)考慮。中國城鎮(zhèn)化的浪潮中，城市的邊緣是社會(huì)實(shí)踐和空間生產(chǎn)的主要場所，在這里具有中國文化根基的村落逐漸消失，農(nóng)民搬遷進(jìn)安置小區(qū)，他們從農(nóng)民突然轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)槌擎?zhèn)居民的不適應(yīng)性表現(xiàn)的愈加明顯。安置小區(qū)的公共空間作為居民日常生活的空間載體，居民的日常活動(dòng)和基本交往在此進(jìn)行。小區(qū)公共空間應(yīng)延續(xù)村落的空間層次，讓小區(qū)有明確的地域性；應(yīng)延續(xù)中國村落居民的人文情感和風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣，適應(yīng)居民現(xiàn)代的生活方式。拆遷安置小區(qū)的適應(yīng)性設(shè)計(jì)同時(shí)應(yīng)該結(jié)合現(xiàn)代城市的社會(huì)、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等因素，對原村落中的受自然條件和人文條件影響形成的空間進(jìn)行借鑒和延續(xù)，進(jìn)而對小區(qū)公共空間進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)譯和重組，滿足現(xiàn)代居民的日常生活需求。
[Abstract]:Now one of the main elements of most cities in China is the straight open streets, the uniform mass of urban housing scattered freely in the park-based urban space. The conceptual map of urban space presents a uniform texture, no contrast, no hierarchy, and a lack of organizational structure. In the process of urbanization, many villages on the edge of the city are disappearing, and the planning of the demolition and resettlement areas is still continuing or plagiarizing the model of modern urban planning. The streets and squares with spatial organization have ceased to exist in the residential area. The space of all levels has been pieced together between the buildings of the residential area, and the level of space has disappeared. To promote new urbanization, we should not blindly copy the foreign planning and design mode, but should inherit their own context and reshape their own cultural and regional characteristics. Without their own cultural foundation, can not create their own characteristics, their advantages will not play out, will cause a thousand cities. In the process of urbanization, many Chinese culture and ideological connotations are missing in the design of urban fringe demolition and resettlement residential district. This kind of rough planning and design is bound to hide all sorts of defects. The sense of belonging and the lack of sense of domain are not only clearly displayed materially, but also in spiritual and cultural needs. In Lefefort's view, space is also productive, the production of space combines the two opposing elements of material and spiritual duality. Space production, not only material production, but also by culture, habit, history and other factors. In social practice, Bourdieu takes habit, field and capital as interaction factors. In the wave of urbanization in China, the edge of the city is the main place for social practice and space production. The villages with the foundation of Chinese culture are gradually disappearing here, and the peasants move into the resettlement areas. Their sudden shift from farmers to urban residents is becoming more and more inadaptable. The public space of the residential area is the space carrier of the residents' daily life, and the daily activities and basic communication of the residents are carried out here. The community public space should extend the spatial level of the village and make the district have a definite regionality, and should continue the humanistic emotion and custom of the Chinese village residents, and adapt to the modern life style of the residents. At the same time, the adaptive design of the relocation and resettlement area should be combined with the social, economic and cultural factors of the modern city, and the space formed by the natural and human conditions in the original village should be used for reference and continued. Then the community public space is translated and reorganized to meet the daily needs of modern residents.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU984.12

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳志強(qiáng);百年現(xiàn)代城市規(guī)劃中不變的精神和責(zé)任[J];城市規(guī)劃;1999年01期

2 胡春光;;慣習(xí)、實(shí)踐與社會(huì)空間——布迪厄論社會(huì)分類[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

3 李雪萍;曹朝龍;;社區(qū)社會(huì)組織與社區(qū)公共空間的生產(chǎn)[J];城市問題;2013年06期

4 亨利·列斐伏爾;李春;;空間、空間的生產(chǎn)和空間政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)[J];城市與區(qū)域規(guī)劃研究;2012年02期

5 劉興;吳曉丹;;公共空間的層次與變遷——村落公共空間形態(tài)分析[J];華中建筑;2008年08期

6 胡(女奇)靖;;淺談社會(huì)學(xué)對建筑學(xué)的影響[J];山西建筑;2009年20期

7 汪原;“日常生活批判”與當(dāng)代建筑學(xué)[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);2004年08期

8 林志森;張玉坤;;基于社區(qū)再造的儀式空間研究[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

9 王曉磊;;“社會(huì)空間”的概念界說與本質(zhì)特征[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2010年01期

10 吳寧;;列斐伏爾對日常生活與非日常生活的思辨及其評價(jià)[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 伍學(xué)進(jìn);城市社區(qū)公共空間宜居性研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2010年

2 李立敏;村落系統(tǒng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展及其綜合評價(jià)方法研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2011年

本文編號：2427701