【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)或歷史街區(qū)是具有歷史價值、文化價值、科學(xué)價值的歷史遺留物,目前我國傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)或歷史街區(qū)的保護(hù)多采用旅游開發(fā)的方式,迎合人們在物質(zhì)生活日益提升之后對精神生活的追求。城鎮(zhèn)空間形態(tài)隨時代演進(jìn)發(fā)展至今,存在階段性變更,但居住空間一直是城市空間結(jié)構(gòu)的主要組成部分。傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)與歷史街區(qū)的保護(hù)與開發(fā)應(yīng)首先考慮居住功能的保留,完善村鎮(zhèn)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,適當(dāng)恢復(fù)原空間聚落形態(tài),著眼于生活功能的提升與居住環(huán)境的改善,汲取原住居民的合理建議,提升整體生活質(zhì)量,切忌整體遷移。 本文選取江浙地區(qū)七處傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)或歷史街區(qū)進(jìn)行實地走訪調(diào)研并分析,了解它們的歷史演進(jìn)過程,規(guī)劃保護(hù)范圍與業(yè)態(tài)布局特點,并對游客、商戶、居住者、管理者等不同社會群體做一定數(shù)量的問卷或訪問調(diào)查�？偨Y(jié)居住功能的保留應(yīng)先于環(huán)境形態(tài)的修繕與旅游資源的開發(fā),忽視這項基本特征挖掘絕對獨特的歷史功能定位與空間形態(tài)肌理本身存在矛盾,并對傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)保護(hù)開發(fā)過程中以居住功能保留為主的兩類模式提出技術(shù)利用可行性引導(dǎo)方案。 破敗的古鎮(zhèn)與街區(qū)需要發(fā)展,但不是盲目的劃地為景區(qū)的規(guī)劃方式。應(yīng)結(jié)合當(dāng)?shù)匕l(fā)展歷史、空間形態(tài)與建筑保留完好程度、原住居民所占比例、功能變更情況,在聚落環(huán)境與村鎮(zhèn)活力恢復(fù)并能延續(xù)的基礎(chǔ)上挖掘旅游資源,補(bǔ)給長期修復(fù)帶來的資金消耗。吸引游客并非歷史保護(hù)的最終目的,旅游開發(fā)也并非村鎮(zhèn)聚落延續(xù)的唯一動力。
[Abstract]:Traditional villages and towns or historical blocks are historical legacies with historical value, cultural value and scientific value. At present, the protection of traditional villages and towns or historical blocks in China is mostly by way of tourism development. Cater to people's pursuit of spiritual life after material life is rising day by day. With the development of the times, the urban spatial form has changed at different stages, but residential space has always been the main component of urban spatial structure. The protection and development of traditional villages and historic blocks should first consider the preservation of residential function, improve the infrastructure of villages and towns, properly restore the original spatial settlement form, and focus on the improvement of living function and living environment. Draw on the reasonable advice of indigenous residents, improve the overall quality of life, do not move as a whole. In this paper, seven traditional villages and towns or historical blocks in Jiangsu and Zhejiang regions are selected for on-the-spot investigation and analysis, to understand their historical evolution process, to plan the scope of protection and the characteristics of the layout of trade patterns, and to make a survey on tourists, merchants and residents. Managers and other social groups do a certain number of questionnaires or interviews. It is concluded that the reservation of residential function should precede the restoration of environmental form and the development of tourism resources. Ignoring this basic feature, the absolutely unique historical function orientation and the texture of spatial form itself are contradictory. The feasibility guiding scheme of technical utilization is put forward for the two kinds of modes in the process of protection and development of traditional villages and towns in which the residence function is mainly reserved. The dilapidated old towns and blocks need to be developed, but they are not blindly designated as the planning methods of scenic spots. The tourism resources should be excavated on the basis of the local history of development, the intact degree of space form and architecture, the proportion of original residents, the change of function, and the recovery of the living environment and the vitality of villages and towns. The cost of long-term repair supplies. Attracting tourists is not the ultimate goal of historical protection, and tourism development is not the only motive force for the continuation of villages and towns.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：TU982.29;TU984.114

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 ;紹興倉橋直街歷史街區(qū)保護(hù)[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2001年05期

2 阮儀三,劉浩;蘇州平江歷史街區(qū)保護(hù)規(guī)劃的戰(zhàn)略思想及理論探索[J];規(guī)劃師;1999年01期

3 馮淑華,方志遠(yuǎn);鄉(xiāng)村聚落景觀的旅游價值研究及開發(fā)模式探討[J];江西社會科學(xué);2004年12期

4 王安石;周明;;美國歷史建筑保護(hù)[J];上海房地;2007年04期

5 徐國平;;諸葛村的明清建筑[J];尋根;2007年01期

，

本文編號：2420560