【摘要】：城市廣場(chǎng)被稱作城市客廳，是城市最容易產(chǎn)生集體記憶的部分，也是城市中進(jìn)行各項(xiàng)公共活動(dòng)的場(chǎng)所，在很大程度上反映了城市的集體意向。隨著我國(guó)城鎮(zhèn)化和經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展，城市廣場(chǎng)開始走向兩個(gè)極端：要么淪為建筑占據(jù)后的空隙，缺乏設(shè)計(jì)與系統(tǒng)性；要么形成規(guī)模巨大但內(nèi)容乏善可陳的市民廣場(chǎng)。公共空間逐漸變得缺乏人情味，公共活動(dòng)衰減。面對(duì)這一現(xiàn)狀，如何更好地組織和利用開放空間，提高城市廣場(chǎng)的活力與城市居民的歸屬感，，是當(dāng)代城市研究必須面對(duì)的問(wèn)題。 通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外城市廣場(chǎng)研究現(xiàn)狀的分析，本研究希望從廣場(chǎng)的活力入手，以現(xiàn)有的一些研究作為基礎(chǔ)。首先對(duì)景觀評(píng)價(jià)方法進(jìn)行深入研究，選取了量化綜合法作為研究方法；然后結(jié)合城市廣場(chǎng)空間活力的特征，借鑒滿意度調(diào)查的成熟操作方法，對(duì)活力量化綜合法進(jìn)行了闡述和深化；最后以廣州典型案例花城廣場(chǎng)作為研究樣本，運(yùn)用活力量化綜合法來(lái)量化評(píng)估城市廣場(chǎng)的活力狀況，得出城市廣場(chǎng)敏感活力構(gòu)成要素，進(jìn)而提出塑造城市廣場(chǎng)活力的有效原則。 本文分為三個(gè)部分，第一部分為基礎(chǔ)知識(shí)，內(nèi)容有緒論和量化綜合分析方法的概述。首先介紹本文研究背景和研究目的，然后通過(guò)對(duì)景觀評(píng)價(jià)方法的總結(jié)和對(duì)比分析，最終選取了量化綜合法作為文本的主要研究方法；第二部分為評(píng)價(jià)體系的建立和實(shí)際案例的操作部分，包含第三、四章，首先建立了城市廣場(chǎng)活力定量評(píng)估框架，接著對(duì)典型案例花城廣場(chǎng)進(jìn)行活力定量評(píng)估操作，得出敏感和不敏感城市廣場(chǎng)活力構(gòu)成要素；第三部分為結(jié)論章節(jié)，將第四章得出的城市廣場(chǎng)敏感活力構(gòu)成要素進(jìn)行分類，提出相應(yīng)的城市廣場(chǎng)活力塑造原則。 本文的研究創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)主要有以下幾個(gè)方面：第一，由于活力易觀察不易直觀表達(dá)的特征，本文首先將量化綜合法運(yùn)用于城市廣場(chǎng)活力的研究；第二，在評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的篩選、評(píng)價(jià)體系的建立上筆者借鑒了使用后評(píng)價(jià)成熟的操作方法完善了活力量化評(píng)估方法；第三，筆者將活力量化評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果與同一樣本的滿意度評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析，進(jìn)一步完善了花城廣場(chǎng)的建成環(huán)境評(píng)價(jià)。
[Abstract]:The city square is called the city living room, is the most easy to produce the collective memory part of the city, also is the place which carries on the various public activities in the city, has reflected the collective intention of the city to a great extent. With the rapid development of urbanization and economy in our country, the city square begins to go to two extremes: it is either reduced to the space occupied by buildings, lacking in design and systematicness, or it forms a large scale public square with little content. Public space gradually becomes devoid of humanity and public activities decay. In the face of this situation, how to better organize and utilize the open space, improve the vitality of the city square and the sense of belonging of the urban residents, is the problem that the contemporary urban research must face. Based on the analysis of the current situation of urban square research at home and abroad, this study hopes to start with the vitality of the square and take some existing research as the basis. Firstly, the landscape evaluation method is deeply studied, and the quantitative synthesis method is selected as the research method. Then, according to the characteristics of the spatial vitality of the city square, the mature operation method of the satisfaction survey is used for reference. Finally, taking Huacheng Square, a typical case of Guangzhou, as the research sample, using the method to quantitatively evaluate the dynamic state of the city square, we can get the elements of the sensitive vitality of the city square. And then put forward the effective principle of shaping the vitality of city square. This paper is divided into three parts, the first part is the basic knowledge, the content has the introduction and the quantity synthesis analysis method outline. Firstly, the background and purpose of this paper are introduced, and then the quantitative synthesis method is selected as the main research method through the summary and comparative analysis of landscape evaluation methods. The second part is the establishment of the evaluation system and the operation of actual cases, including the third and fourth chapters. Firstly, the paper establishes the framework of the city square vitality quantitative evaluation, and then carries on the vitality quantitative evaluation operation to the typical case Huacheng square. The third part is the conclusion chapter, which classifies the components of the city square vitality obtained in the fourth chapter, and puts forward the corresponding principles of the city square vitality molding. The main research innovations of this paper are as follows: first, due to the characteristics that vitality is easy to observe and not easy to express, this paper first applies the quantitative synthesis method to the study of urban square vitality; second, the selection of evaluation indicators. On the establishment of the evaluation system, the author used the mature operation methods of post-evaluation to perfect the quantitative evaluation method of vitality. Thirdly, the author compared the results of the quantitative evaluation of vitality with the satisfaction evaluation results of the same sample. Further improved the Huacheng Square built environment evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王劍鋒,艾及熙;城市空間形態(tài)量化分析初探[J];重慶建筑;2004年S1期

2 李萬(wàn)林;;城市公共空間的活力與特征淺述[J];重慶建筑;2011年12期

3 汪海;蔣滌非;;城市公共空間活力評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[J];鐵道科學(xué)與工程學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

4 林炳耀;城市空間形態(tài)的計(jì)量方法及其評(píng)價(jià)[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;1998年03期

5 袁烽;都市景觀的評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;1999年06期

6 朱小雷,吳碩賢;基于建成環(huán)境主觀評(píng)價(jià)的設(shè)計(jì)決策分析——結(jié)合珠海蓮花路商業(yè)步行街環(huán)境評(píng)價(jià)調(diào)查分析[J];規(guī)劃師;2002年09期

7 吳碩賢,李勁鵬,霍云,張三明;居住區(qū)生活與環(huán)境質(zhì)量綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2000年05期

8 黃建;王碧琴;;多種評(píng)價(jià)方法在景觀評(píng)價(jià)中的綜合應(yīng)用[J];江西科學(xué);2006年04期

9 李曦;;城市公共空間的組成元素及特征[J];山西建筑;2010年11期

10 郭恩章;高質(zhì)量城市公共空間的設(shè)計(jì)對(duì)策[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期

本文編號(hào)：2270386