本文選題：城市開發(fā)強(qiáng)度 + 基準(zhǔn)開發(fā)強(qiáng)度　； 參考：《安徽建筑大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：中央城鎮(zhèn)化工作會(huì)議明確提出，各級(jí)城市要科學(xué)設(shè)置開發(fā)強(qiáng)度，優(yōu)化城市空間布局和形態(tài)。在伴隨中國快速城鎮(zhèn)化和整體經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力騰飛的這十多年內(nèi)，國內(nèi)大城市的人口規(guī)模經(jīng)歷了爆發(fā)式的增長，大量涌入的人口造成城市規(guī)模加速擴(kuò)張，滯后的規(guī)劃體系和不夠健全的法律制度已經(jīng)不能控制城市的超態(tài)勢發(fā)展，造成了城市的土地粗放利用、人口分布不均和強(qiáng)度分布不合理的問題。同時(shí)，由于我國大部分城市在開發(fā)強(qiáng)度控制方面缺乏有效的科學(xué)方法，即便是在編制相應(yīng)規(guī)劃時(shí)對強(qiáng)度的評判也均多基于定性分析，缺乏定量評判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和宏觀層面的把握，更是加劇這一問題的嚴(yán)重程度。 本研究是基于國內(nèi)城市開發(fā)強(qiáng)度分布欠合理以及控規(guī)編制中確定容積率等強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)時(shí)缺乏足夠上層依據(jù)的大背景下，在收集整理國內(nèi)外城市在城市開發(fā)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)方面的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ)上，，通過對城市基準(zhǔn)開發(fā)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)的框架體系的剖析，對其評價(jià)單元、因素選取等方面進(jìn)行反思總結(jié)，借鑒其邏輯思路并完善和細(xì)化相關(guān)影響因素，接著嘗試性的增加了控規(guī)管理單元層級(jí)評價(jià)模型，改進(jìn)了街區(qū)層級(jí)的評價(jià)模型，最后以合肥濱湖新區(qū)為案例選取了7個(gè)控規(guī)管理單元和69個(gè)街區(qū)進(jìn)行了方法應(yīng)用。 基準(zhǔn)開發(fā)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)是城市開發(fā)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)方法體系中重要的組成部分。文章是針對城市的基準(zhǔn)開發(fā)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)方法進(jìn)行改進(jìn)研究，得出了控規(guī)管理單元和街區(qū)兩個(gè)層級(jí)的基準(zhǔn)強(qiáng)度評價(jià)模型�；鶞�(zhǔn)強(qiáng)度模型有別于修正強(qiáng)度模型，具有較大普適性，本文研究中對影響因素的選取一方面考慮比較全面，另一方面也盡量選取具有全局性影響的因素。因此，研究得出的方法體系和評價(jià)模型對一般性大城市都具有較強(qiáng)的適用性。 城市開發(fā)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)方法的框架體系比較復(fù)雜，至今在國內(nèi)仍沒有完善成熟的方法可以有效的應(yīng)用，這也是筆者僅僅選取基準(zhǔn)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)進(jìn)行改進(jìn)研究的原因之一。文章在研究中順應(yīng)了目前規(guī)劃編制的趨勢和一般性思路，盡管對基準(zhǔn)強(qiáng)度分區(qū)的操作體系進(jìn)行了改進(jìn)研究，對影響因素的選取也考慮的比較全面，同時(shí)也運(yùn)用了層次分析法對影響因素的權(quán)重進(jìn)行了賦值，但不可否認(rèn)，這些方面的合理度仍然值得商榷。
[Abstract]:The Central working Conference on urbanization clearly proposed that cities at all levels should scientifically set up the development intensity and optimize the urban spatial layout and form. With China's rapid urbanization and overall economic strength taking off in the past decade or so, the size of the population of the big cities in the country has experienced explosive growth, and a large influx of people has resulted in the accelerated expansion of the urban scale. The lagging planning system and unsound legal system can no longer control the development of the city, which results in the problems of extensive utilization of urban land, uneven distribution of population and unreasonable distribution of intensity. At the same time, due to the lack of effective scientific methods in the development intensity control of most cities in China, even the evaluation of intensity is based on qualitative analysis, and lacks of quantitative evaluation criteria and macro-level grasp. It also exacerbates the severity of the problem. This research is based on the unreasonable distribution of the intensity of urban development in China and the lack of sufficient upper level basis for the determination of the strength index such as the volume rate in the compilation of the control plan. On the basis of collecting and sorting out the practical experience of urban development intensity zoning at home and abroad, through the analysis of the frame system of urban benchmark development intensity zoning, this paper rethinks and summarizes its evaluation unit, factors selection and so on. Drawing on its logical thinking and perfecting and refining the relevant influencing factors, this paper tries to increase the level evaluation model of the control management unit and improve the evaluation model of the block level. Finally, 7 control management units and 69 blocks were selected for the case of Hefei Binhu New area. Benchmark development intensity zoning is an important part of urban development intensity zoning method system. This paper is aimed at the improvement of urban benchmark development intensity zoning method, and obtains the benchmark intensity evaluation model of control management unit and block level. The benchmark strength model is different from the modified strength model and has great universality. On the one hand, the selection of influencing factors is considered comprehensively in this study, on the other hand, the factors with global influence are also selected as far as possible. Therefore, the method system and evaluation model are applicable to the general big cities. The frame system of urban development intensity zoning method is complex, so far there is no mature method can be effectively applied in China, which is one of the reasons why the author only selects the benchmark intensity zoning to improve the research. In the research, the paper conforms to the current trend of planning and general thinking, although the operation system of benchmark intensity zoning has been improved, and the selection of influencing factors has been considered more comprehensively. At the same time, the analytic hierarchy process is also used to assign the weight of the influencing factors, but it is undeniable that the rationality of these aspects is still open to question.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽建筑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU984

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 劉麗榮;袁澤;張磊;;基于密度分區(qū)的城市經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展空間布局研究——以桂林漓東新城為例[J];青島科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

2 韓勝風(fēng);陳小鴻;;我國大城市道路紅線寬度研究[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2006年07期

3 ;中央城鎮(zhèn)化工作會(huì)議在北京舉行[J];實(shí)踐(思想理論版);2014年01期

4 徐璐璐;;行政管理視角下城市土地的規(guī)劃和控制系統(tǒng)——新加坡城市規(guī)劃案例研究[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)財(cái)富;2010年10期

5 鄒經(jīng)宇,張暉;適合高人口密度的城市生態(tài)住區(qū)研究——關(guān)于香港模式的思考[J];新建筑;2004年04期

6 顧翠紅;魏清泉;;香港土地開發(fā)強(qiáng)度規(guī)劃控制的方法及其借鑒[J];中國土地科學(xué);2006年04期

本文編號(hào)：2088581