本文選題：城市更新　切入點(diǎn)：容積率　出處：《深圳大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：城市在持續(xù)發(fā)展之后,普遍會(huì)遇到一個(gè)所謂的“瓶頸”階段,在這個(gè)階段,不論是它的基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施或者城市的功能,都沒(méi)有辦法負(fù)擔(dān)城市下階段持續(xù)健康發(fā)展的需要,因此這個(gè)時(shí)候這個(gè)城市或者說(shuō)這個(gè)城市的部分區(qū)域即有進(jìn)行更新改造的必要。而城市更新的目的,在于通過(guò)城市更新的種種手段,使得城市中的不良地區(qū)得以改善,以提高居民的居住品質(zhì)和水準(zhǔn)。本文專(zhuān)門(mén)針對(duì)深圳市城市更新的具體實(shí)踐出現(xiàn)的現(xiàn)象及問(wèn)題,進(jìn)行研究。本文除卻引言及結(jié)語(yǔ)兩個(gè)部分,總共可分為四大部分。第一章是對(duì)深圳市城市更新制度總體進(jìn)行解構(gòu),首先介紹了深圳市土地國(guó)有化轉(zhuǎn)制、用地緊張及存量土地成為深圳市城市土地供應(yīng)的主要來(lái)源的制度背景,其后從構(gòu)建土地增值收益分配和土地所有權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)變機(jī)制,引入市場(chǎng)化操作的角度進(jìn)行制度總體解構(gòu),最后對(duì)制度實(shí)施幾年以來(lái)取得的成果總結(jié)和制度不足進(jìn)行反思,其帶來(lái)了更新區(qū)域環(huán)境的改善和居住品質(zhì)的提高,供應(yīng)了城市發(fā)展所需的土地,增加了投資拉動(dòng)了經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的成果,但是在其實(shí)施中也產(chǎn)生了種種不足和問(wèn)題,從而引出以下三章的內(nèi)容。第二章是對(duì)深圳市城市更新容積管理機(jī)制的研究,首先介紹了深圳市城市更新項(xiàng)目普遍存在的高容積、高樓層的現(xiàn)象,引出對(duì)城市更新過(guò)程中容積率這個(gè)問(wèn)題的分析,在其后詳細(xì)介紹了美國(guó)城市土地管理思維和容積管理措施在城市土地管理中的應(yīng)用這一理論,最后據(jù)此對(duì)我國(guó)容積調(diào)整管理機(jī)制和深圳市城市更新中的容積管理機(jī)制進(jìn)行反思、提出改善意見(jiàn)。第三章是對(duì)深圳市城市更新封鎖效力機(jī)制的研究,首先介紹的是在城市更新范圍確定的前后,往往會(huì)出現(xiàn)投資客對(duì)拆遷房的炒作和業(yè)主對(duì)拆遷房的搶建等與后期城市更新目的不相吻合的干擾行為這樣一種現(xiàn)象及引發(fā)的問(wèn)題,其后是對(duì)在這一領(lǐng)域相對(duì)實(shí)踐時(shí)間較長(zhǎng)和法制較完善的德國(guó)法制的介紹,最后是就在深圳市城市更新構(gòu)建起這樣一種切實(shí)可行的封鎖效力機(jī)制的構(gòu)想。第四章是對(duì)深圳市城市更新中公權(quán)力是否應(yīng)該介入市場(chǎng)化運(yùn)作中的深圳市城市更新拆遷過(guò)程的研究,本章在總結(jié)其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)上,得出公權(quán)力應(yīng)該以合理的方式適當(dāng)介入拆遷。
[Abstract]:After sustained development, cities generally encounter a so-called "bottleneck" stage, in which neither their infrastructure nor the city's functions can afford the need for sustainable and healthy development in the next phase of the city.Therefore, at this time, the city or part of the city is necessary to be renovated.The purpose of urban renewal is to improve the poor areas of the city through various means of urban renewal in order to improve the residents' living quality and standard.This paper focuses on the phenomena and problems in the practice of urban renewal in Shenzhen.Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this article can be divided into four parts.The first chapter is to deconstruct the urban renewal system of Shenzhen City. Firstly, it introduces the system background of the nationalization and transformation of Shenzhen's land, the shortage of land and the stock of land as the main source of urban land supply in Shenzhen.After that, from the perspective of constructing the mechanism of land value-added income distribution and land ownership transformation, the system is deconstructed in general from the perspective of market-oriented operation. Finally, it reflects on the achievements made in the implementation of the system in the past few years and the insufficiency of the system.It has brought about the improvement of the regional environment and the improvement of the living quality, provided the land needed for the urban development, increased the results of the investment to stimulate the economic growth, but also produced various shortcomings and problems in its implementation.Thus leads to the contents of the following three chapters.The second chapter is the research of Shenzhen city renewal volume management mechanism. Firstly, it introduces the phenomenon of high volume and high floor in Shenzhen city renewal project, which leads to the analysis of the problem of volume rate in the process of city renewal.After that, the author introduces the theory of the thinking of urban land management and the application of volume management measures in urban land management in the United States in detail. Finally, it reflects on the management mechanism of volume adjustment in China and the volume management mechanism in urban renewal in Shenzhen.Put forward suggestions for improvement.The third chapter is a study on the effectiveness of urban renewal blockade in Shenzhen. First of all, it introduces the scope of urban renewal before and after the determination.There is often a phenomenon and the problem caused by the phenomenon that the speculation of the investors on the demolition of the house and the building of the demolition house by the owners do not coincide with the purpose of the urban renewal in the later period.Then it introduces the German legal system, which is relatively long in practice and perfect in legal system in this field. Finally, the idea of constructing such a feasible blockade mechanism in Shenzhen city is put forward.The fourth chapter is a study on whether the public power should be involved in the process of urban renewal and demolition in the market operation of Shenzhen. This chapter summarizes the experiences of other countries and regions.Public power should be properly involved in demolition in a reasonable manner.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU984.114;D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄧志旺;;城市更新政策研究——以深圳和臺(tái)灣比較為例[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2014年03期

2 劉芳;姜仁榮;劉峰;;從產(chǎn)權(quán)實(shí)施能力看產(chǎn)權(quán)界定的重要性——深圳市歷史遺留違法建筑確權(quán)政策解讀[J];國(guó)土資源科技管理;2012年03期

3 華燕;;論社會(huì)多數(shù)決的適用——基于公寓大廈管理立法展開(kāi)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2012年03期

4 劉世穎;;臺(tái)灣地區(qū)區(qū)段征收制度簡(jiǎn)介[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S2期

5 曾娜;;香港商業(yè)拆遷法律制度及啟示[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年12期

6 張建榮;李孝娟;;直面舊工業(yè)區(qū)“未合法”工業(yè)用地的改造困境——以深圳為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2011年10期

7 劉云剛;黃思騏;袁媛;;“三舊”改造政策分析——以東莞市為例[J];城市觀(guān)察;2011年02期

8 劉昕;;深圳城市更新中的政府角色與作為——從利益共享走向責(zé)任共擔(dān)[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2011年01期

9 金廣君;戴锏;;臺(tái)灣地區(qū)容積轉(zhuǎn)移制度解析[J];國(guó)際城市規(guī)劃;2010年04期

10 梁仁旭;陳奉瑤;;臺(tái)灣推動(dòng)都市更新的阻力[J];中國(guó)土地;2009年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：1714358