本文選題：泉州傳統(tǒng)建筑　切入點(diǎn)：營造術(shù)語　出處：《華僑大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：營造術(shù)語指在從事與傳統(tǒng)建筑相關(guān)的營造活動(dòng)時(shí)涉及到的專有名詞和做法的名稱，是表示概念的專門用語。我國早在北宋頒布的建筑專業(yè)術(shù)書《營造法式》中已有關(guān)于營造術(shù)語的系統(tǒng)梳理。福建泉州作為中國海上絲綢之路的起點(diǎn)，其歷史悠久，也是閩南文化保護(hù)的核心區(qū)。在建筑文化層面，隨著研究深度和廣度的不斷增加，，目前對(duì)泉州傳統(tǒng)建筑的研究不僅在建筑空間、結(jié)構(gòu)、裝飾和地域文化等方面成果頗豐，有關(guān)建筑歷史研究最重要的載體——營造術(shù)語的研究成果經(jīng)過幾十年的沉淀，也具備了一定的規(guī)模。但是，目前的泉州營造術(shù)語研究成果雖然較多卻略顯零散，一直以來還沒有對(duì)相關(guān)研究方法和學(xué)術(shù)思想的回溯和總結(jié)，以致諸多研究者不能掌握該領(lǐng)域的研究現(xiàn)狀和已有的研究方法，阻礙了相關(guān)研究的進(jìn)程，也影響了研究成果的客觀性。 本文在對(duì)目前研究現(xiàn)狀的體認(rèn)下，細(xì)致梳理現(xiàn)代以來泉州傳統(tǒng)建筑營造術(shù)語已有研究和成果（主要包括現(xiàn)代以來公開出版或發(fā)表的專著、期刊論文、學(xué)位論文、會(huì)議論文等文獻(xiàn)），全面考察相關(guān)研究主體、學(xué)術(shù)流派，從基于傳統(tǒng)建筑實(shí)物、工匠訪談和文獻(xiàn)學(xué)方法的術(shù)語研究這幾個(gè)層面，對(duì)泉州傳統(tǒng)建筑營造術(shù)語的研究歷程嘗試進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析和歸納，盡可能在總結(jié)研究目的、方法、成就和影響的基礎(chǔ)上，彰顯各個(gè)時(shí)期典型的學(xué)術(shù)思想和研究方法，明晰當(dāng)前存在的問題和今后可以深入的方向，為相關(guān)研究提供參考和借鑒。進(jìn)而在已有研究方法的基礎(chǔ)上，在工匠訪談和文獻(xiàn)學(xué)層面進(jìn)行實(shí)踐性和補(bǔ)充性的研究嘗試，探索新的研究方法和理路，以促進(jìn)泉州傳統(tǒng)建筑營造術(shù)語研究的繼續(xù)深入以至新的突破，為完善閩南地區(qū)的建筑歷史研究乃至保護(hù)閩南傳統(tǒng)文化做出貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The name refers to the construction activities associated with the construction of traditional architecture in the involved terminology and practices, is a terminology concept. China has to create early on to create a French term > systematically in the Northern Song Dynasty issued building professional art book ". Fujian Quanzhou as the starting point of the maritime Silk Road Chinese and it has a long history, is the core area of the protection of Taiwanese culture. In the construction of cultural level, with the increase of the depth and breadth of the research, the current research on Quanzhou traditional architecture, not only in the construction of space, structure, decoration and other aspects of local cultural achievements, research on construction history the most important carrier -- building terminology research results after decades of precipitation, but also has a certain scale. However, the current Quanzhou building term although there are many research results are scattered, has been not to The research methods and academic thoughts are Retrospection and summarization, so that many researchers can not grasp the research status and existing research methods in the field, which hampers the related research process, and also affects the objectivity of the research results.
Based on the current research status of the recognition, careful combing modern Quanzhou since the traditional construction in terms of existing research and achievements (including modern published or published monographs, journals, dissertations, conference papers and other documents), a comprehensive study of related research subjects, academic schools, from the traditional physical architecture based on terminology study on the method of interview and literature of the craftsmen of several levels, the study history of the Quanzhou traditional architecture in terms of attempts to make a systematic analysis and induction, as far as possible in the summary of the research methods, purpose, basic achievements and influence on the development of academic thought and research methods of each period of time, clear the current problems and future development the direction, and provide reference for related research. Then based on the existing research methods, practice and fill in artisan interview and literature perspective We will try our best to explore new research methods and approaches so as to further deepen the research of the term of traditional architecture in Quanzhou, and to make contributions to improve the history of architecture in Southern Fujian and even protect the traditional culture of Southern Fujian.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU-092

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 關(guān)瑞明;陳力;;泉州官式大厝的詞源及其讀音釋義辨析[J];福建建筑;2006年01期

2 方擁;楊昌鳴;;閩南小型石構(gòu)佛塔與經(jīng)幢[J];古建園林技術(shù);1993年04期

3 張玉瑜 ,朱光亞;福建大木作篙尺技藝搶救性研究[J];古建園林技術(shù);2005年03期

4 陳薇;;中國建筑史研究領(lǐng)域中的前導(dǎo)性突破——近年來中國建筑史研究評(píng)述[J];華中建筑;1989年04期

5 吳慶洲;中國建筑史學(xué)近20年的發(fā)展及今后展望[J];華中建筑;2005年03期

6 林從華;閩南與臺(tái)灣傳統(tǒng)建筑匠藝探析[J];福建工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

7 楊鴻勛;中國建筑史學(xué)的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義及其研究的新階段——在中國建筑學(xué)會(huì)建筑史學(xué)分會(huì)成立暨第一次年會(huì)上的發(fā)言[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);1993年12期

8 彭怒;關(guān)于建筑歷史、歷史學(xué)理論中幾個(gè)基本問題的思考[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

9 王其亨，楊昌鳴;深化中國建筑歷史研究與教學(xué)的思考[J];建筑學(xué)報(bào);1995年08期

10 僗為璣;;談最近發(fā)現(xiàn)的泉州中外交通的史跡[J];考古通訊;1956年03期

本文編號(hào)：1624761