本文選題：日常生活　切入點(diǎn)：城市復(fù)興　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：改革開放以后,伴隨經(jīng)濟(jì)的騰飛,中國(guó)城市也開始了的大規(guī)模、高速度、跨越式的發(fā)展。各個(gè)城市競(jìng)相展開建設(shè)成就的競(jìng)賽,比拼新城建設(shè)面積和舊城改造規(guī)模。急功近利思想的泛濫、對(duì)短期政績(jī)的追求以及對(duì)技術(shù)理性的片面依賴,使舊城更新過度強(qiáng)調(diào)高效率,追求直觀的物質(zhì)環(huán)境改善和土地再開發(fā)帶來的經(jīng)濟(jì)數(shù)字的增長(zhǎng),致力于根除混雜、無序的舊城空間,以改善舊城居民生活為目標(biāo)而開始的宏偉建設(shè),在實(shí)施的過程中逐漸忘了“為什么造城,為誰而造城?”。舊城更新遺忘了城市的生活本質(zhì),忽視城市空間發(fā)展中對(duì)人最基本的日常生活需求的回應(yīng),弱化了對(duì)人的切實(shí)空間體驗(yàn)的關(guān)注,導(dǎo)致人與新建成空間的關(guān)系疏遠(yuǎn),舊城更新既沒有挖掘出舊城真正的生活特色,更沒有恢復(fù)舊城的活力,只是建造了一個(gè)個(gè)孤立的形象工程,反而將城市帶往遠(yuǎn)離居民日常生活的方向。與此同時(shí),由于長(zhǎng)期以來舊城更新過于依賴市場(chǎng)機(jī)制,政府干預(yù)失效,舊城中心區(qū)空間在快速、無序的擴(kuò)展中,出現(xiàn)了城市原有整體結(jié)構(gòu)被破壞、功能空間割裂加劇、公共空間不足、地域特色消失、空間缺乏人性化等一系列問題。因此,有必要以舊城普通居民的日常生活為出發(fā)點(diǎn),重新審視舊城更新的目標(biāo)和方法。本文從“日常生活”視角出發(fā),倡導(dǎo)建構(gòu)一套自下而上、直接面對(duì)日常生活基礎(chǔ)需求的舊城復(fù)興設(shè)計(jì)策略,為現(xiàn)行舊城復(fù)興策略提供更準(zhǔn)確的定向和有益的補(bǔ)充。一方面,整合哲學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)等多學(xué)科對(duì)日常生活的研究成果,研究日常生活空間發(fā)展的內(nèi)在邏輯與外部動(dòng)因;另一方面,分析我國(guó)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型和結(jié)構(gòu)變革背景下,居民日常生活方式變遷所引起的舊城中心區(qū)更新的主要矛盾,明確主要問題。在綜合相關(guān)理論以及實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),認(rèn)清現(xiàn)實(shí)問題的基礎(chǔ)上,明確舊城復(fù)興設(shè)計(jì)的關(guān)注要素和價(jià)值取向,制定設(shè)計(jì)的目標(biāo)、原則和方法。探討如何在宏觀層面優(yōu)化舊城生活格局、中觀層面完善生活街區(qū)空間體系、微觀層面營(yíng)造生活性空間,使舊城中心區(qū)的生存環(huán)境和生活空間更符合多樣化的日常生活需求,推動(dòng)舊城中心區(qū)的良性可持續(xù)發(fā)展。最后,將策略理論應(yīng)用于實(shí)際,通過廣州市解放中路舊城復(fù)興工程的實(shí)證研究,論證日常生活視角下舊城復(fù)興設(shè)計(jì)策略的可行性。
[Abstract]:After the reform and opening up, with the rapid development of the economy, Chinese cities have also begun a large-scale, high-speed, leap-forward development. Each city competes for construction achievements. Comparing the construction area of the new city and the scale of the old city transformation, the flood of the idea of quick success and instant benefit, the pursuit of short-term achievements and the one-sided reliance on technical rationality make the renewal of the old city place too much emphasis on high efficiency. Pursuing the intuitive material environment improvement and the economic growth brought by the land redevelopment, and devoting to the eradication of the mixed and disordered old city space, and the magnificent construction that began with the goal of improving the living conditions of the old city residents, In the process of implementation, gradually forgot "Why built cities, for whom to build cities?" "... the renewal of the old city has forgotten the nature of life in the city, ignored the response to the most basic daily needs of human beings in the development of urban space, weakened the attention paid to the practical spatial experience of the human being, and resulted in the alienation of the relationship between the human being and the newly built space, The renewal of the old city did not excavate the real characteristics of life in the old city, nor did it restore the vitality of the old city. Instead, it built an isolated image project and took the city away from the direction of daily life of the residents. At the same time, For a long time, the old city renewal has been too dependent on the market mechanism and the government intervention has failed. In the rapid and disordered expansion of the old city center space, the original overall structure of the city has been destroyed, the functional space has become more fragmented, and the public space is insufficient. A series of problems, such as the disappearance of regional characteristics and the lack of humanization in space, are necessary. Therefore, it is necessary to take the daily life of the ordinary residents of the old city as the starting point to re-examine the goals and methods of the renewal of the old city. Advocating the construction of a bottom-up design strategy that directly faces the basic needs of daily life in order to provide a more accurate orientation and beneficial supplement for the current strategy of old city renaissance. On the one hand, the integration philosophy, On the other hand, under the background of social and economic transformation and structural change, this paper studies the internal logic and external motivation of the development of daily living space. On the basis of synthesizing the relevant theories and practical experiences, the main contradiction of the renewal of the old city's central district caused by the change of the residents' daily life style is clarified and the main problems are clearly defined. This paper clarifies the concerned elements and value orientation of the old city rejuvenation design, formulates the design goals, principles and methods, probes into how to optimize the living pattern of the old city at the macro level, and consummates the living block space system at the middle level. In order to make the living environment and living space of the center of the old city more in line with the diversified daily life needs, it can promote the benign and sustainable development of the central district of the old city. Finally, the strategy theory is applied to the practice. Based on the empirical study of the Old City Renaissance Project in Jiefangzhong Road, Guangzhou City, the feasibility of the design strategy of the Old City Renaissance Project from the perspective of daily life is demonstrated.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：TU984.114

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王珊,李麗,戴儉,白宇,梁超;北京舊城文物及鄰近街區(qū)地下空間開發(fā)利用探討[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2005年03期

2 蔣競(jìng);;金錢、文化的悲劇、現(xiàn)代性體驗(yàn)——關(guān)于齊美爾的現(xiàn)代性的若干思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年16期

3 徐永健,閻小培;加拿大蒙特利爾市地下城規(guī)劃與建設(shè)[J];國(guó)外城市規(guī)劃;2001年03期

4 秦斌祥;芝加哥學(xué)派的城市社會(huì)學(xué)理論與方法[J];美國(guó)研究;1991年04期

5 吳晨;城市復(fù)興的理論探索[J];世界建筑;2002年12期

6 汪原;;零度化與日常都市主義策略[J];新建筑;2009年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 金元浦;[N];中華讀書報(bào);2001年

，

本文編號(hào)：1590781