發(fā)布時間：2018-11-14 20:33

【摘要】：近幾年以來,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融常常出現(xiàn)在大家的視線中,P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺很快得到了市場的認可。陸金所作為平安集團的子公司主要以P2P業(yè)務(wù)起家,在2012年3月正式投入運營。截止2016年底已成為中國最大的網(wǎng)絡(luò)投融資平臺之一,其發(fā)展的成功之處值得肯定與學(xué)習(xí)。本人在了解陸金所的運營模式以及其產(chǎn)品后,對其P2P平臺風(fēng)險現(xiàn)狀的進行分析,指出陸金所P2P平臺風(fēng)險控制點,包括征信系統(tǒng)、信息透明度、財務(wù)風(fēng)險管理機制等。結(jié)合陸金所P2P業(yè)務(wù)控制財務(wù)風(fēng)險的管理經(jīng)驗和問題提出一些建議。在撰寫本文時,首先介紹了陸金所目前的經(jīng)營狀況,主要包括陸金所成立的背景、其主要幾類理財產(chǎn)品、具體產(chǎn)品分類、運營中各環(huán)節(jié)的盈利方式以及相關(guān)風(fēng)險。然后分析了陸金所的P2P業(yè)務(wù),包括主要產(chǎn)品介紹、業(yè)務(wù)具體流程等。接著對陸金所P2P平臺所在經(jīng)營過程中財務(wù)風(fēng)險進行了分析,分別對其信用風(fēng)險、資本風(fēng)險、盈利風(fēng)險以及流動風(fēng)險四個方面進行了成因及識別分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)陸金所P2P平臺財務(wù)風(fēng)險主要源于征信系統(tǒng)不完善、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)與金融行業(yè)存在信息割裂、注冊資本不足、交易量不足以覆蓋固定成本等。并闡述了陸金所P2P平臺財務(wù)風(fēng)險管理現(xiàn)狀以及存在的問題,例如:征信資料不完備,信用評價效果不佳,信息透明度差,實繳比例不足,投資成本增加等。最后針對陸金所P2P平臺財務(wù)風(fēng)險管理中存在的問題提出建立并完善風(fēng)險預(yù)警機制和信用評級機制、完善信息披露制度并提高信息透明度、加快去擔(dān)保進程、控制成本、加強外部合作等建議,并提出展望。
[Abstract]:In recent years, Internet finance often appears in the sight of everyone, P2P network lending platform has been quickly recognized by the market. Lufax, as a subsidiary of Ping an Group, started with P2P business and put into operation in March 2012. By the end of 2016, China has become one of the largest online investment and financing platform, its development success is worthy of recognition and learning. After understanding lufax's operation mode and its products, this paper analyzes the present situation of the risk of peer-to-peer platform, and points out the risk control points, including credit information system, information transparency, financial risk management mechanism and so on. Combined with lufax P2P business management experience and problems in controlling financial risk put forward some suggestions. When writing this article, we first introduce lufax's current operating situation, mainly including the background of lufax's establishment, several kinds of financial products, the classification of specific products, the profit mode of each link in operation and the related risks. Then analyzes lufax's P2P business, including the main product introduction, business process and so on. Then it analyzes the financial risk of lufax P2P platform, and analyzes its credit risk, capital risk, profit risk and liquidity risk respectively. It is found that the financial risk of lufax P2P platform is mainly due to the imperfection of credit information system, the information separation between the Internet and the financial industry, the insufficient registered capital and the insufficient trading volume to cover the fixed cost and so on. The present situation and existing problems of financial risk management in lufax P2P platform are expounded, such as incomplete credit information, poor credit evaluation effect, poor information transparency, insufficient proportion of actual payment, increasing investment cost, and so on. Finally, aiming at the problems existing in the financial risk management of lufax P2P platform, the paper proposes to establish and perfect the risk warning mechanism and credit rating mechanism, to perfect the information disclosure system and to improve the information transparency, to speed up the process of de-guarantee, and to control the cost. Strengthen external cooperation and other suggestions, and put forward prospects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧夏大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F724.6;F832.4;F830.42

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 阮亞東;;P2P理財平臺風(fēng)險分析[J];時代金融;2016年11期

2 畢沛然;;普惠金融下P2P借貸平臺的運營模式及發(fā)展策略[J];中國集體經(jīng)濟;2015年06期

3 羅建華;譚嘉玲;;我國P2P網(wǎng)貸平臺風(fēng)險防范研究[J];商;2015年01期

4 王云飛;;P2P網(wǎng)貸平臺競爭優(yōu)勢分析研究[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2015年01期

5 王丹;馬家瑞;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融P2P模式淺析[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2014年19期

6 郭衛(wèi)東;李穎;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺P2P模式探索[J];中國流通經(jīng)濟;2014年06期

7 何曉玲;王玫;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸現(xiàn)狀及風(fēng)險防范[J];中國商貿(mào);2013年20期

8 宮曉林;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融模式及對傳統(tǒng)銀行業(yè)的影響[J];南方金融;2013年05期

9 謝平;鄒傳偉;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融模式研究[J];金融研究;2012年12期

10 王紫薇;袁中華;鐘鑫;;中國P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)小額信貸運營模式研究——基于“拍拍貸”、“宜農(nóng)貸”的案例分析[J];新金融;2012年02期

，

本文編號：2332230