本文選題：商業(yè)銀行　切入點：“營改增”　出處：《吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：為適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展,我國于2016年5月起正式將金融業(yè)納入“營改增”的范圍,這標(biāo)志著我國的營業(yè)稅徹底退出歷史舞臺,金融業(yè)“營改增”對我國金融行業(yè)的發(fā)展有著重要意義。金融業(yè)的稅收是我國中央財政收入的重要來源之一,金融稅制是否科學(xué)不僅直接影響到金融企業(yè)的經(jīng)營成果,而且也成為影響金融市場健康發(fā)展的重要因素。在“營改增”之前,我國金融業(yè)繳納的是營業(yè)稅,這種稅收制度一方面造成了金融業(yè)重復(fù)征稅現(xiàn)象,導(dǎo)致我國金融行業(yè)稅負較重,阻礙了金融業(yè)的發(fā)展,另一方面,國外的金融業(yè)大都采用增值稅的稅收制度,營業(yè)稅的稅收制度降低了我國金融業(yè)的國際競爭力,阻礙了金融業(yè)的海外業(yè)務(wù)擴張,因此,我國在2016年5月1日起將金融業(yè)納入“營改增”的范圍,對我國金融業(yè)征收增值稅。但是,金融業(yè)“營改增”之后是否達到預(yù)期減稅效果,降低金融業(yè)稅收負擔(dān),還需要進一步的分析測算。本文從金融業(yè)“營改增”這一背景出發(fā),重點研究金融業(yè)中的銀行業(yè),以H商業(yè)銀行為例,結(jié)合H商業(yè)銀行自身特色以及相關(guān)稅收政策,選取H商業(yè)銀行的財務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)從而測算出“營改增”前后H商業(yè)銀行的稅收負擔(dān)變化情況,為H商業(yè)銀行應(yīng)對此次金融業(yè)“營改增”給出相應(yīng)的建議。本文首先闡述了金融業(yè)“營改增”的主要內(nèi)容以及相關(guān)的政策解釋,然后以H商業(yè)銀行為例,測算了“營改增”對商業(yè)銀行的稅收負擔(dān)產(chǎn)生的影響。然后分析稅收負擔(dān)變化的原因。最后結(jié)合測算結(jié)果以及稅負變化的原因分析,分別從稅收籌劃、業(yè)務(wù)人員素質(zhì)培訓(xùn)、財稅管理架構(gòu)完善、現(xiàn)金流管控以及經(jīng)營業(yè)務(wù)方向規(guī)劃五個角度給出相關(guān)建議,為銀行業(yè)應(yīng)對金融業(yè)“營改增”提供意見參考。
[Abstract]:In order to adapt to the economic development, China formally brought the financial industry into the scope of "business reform and increase" from May 2016, which marked the complete withdrawal of China's business tax from the historical stage. It is of great significance to the development of financial industry in our country. The tax revenue of financial industry is one of the important sources of the central financial revenue of our country. Whether the financial tax system is scientific or not not only directly affects the operating results of financial enterprises. It has also become an important factor affecting the healthy development of the financial market. Before "business reform and increase", the financial industry in our country paid a business tax, which on the one hand led to the phenomenon of repeated taxation in the financial sector. The tax burden of our financial industry is heavy, which hinders the development of the financial industry. On the other hand, the foreign financial industry mostly adopts the tax system of value-added tax, and the tax system of the business tax reduces the international competitiveness of the financial industry of our country. This has hindered the expansion of the overseas business of the financial industry. Therefore, since May 1st 2016, China has brought the financial industry into the scope of "reform and increase" and imposed value-added tax on the financial industry of our country. It is necessary to further analyze and calculate whether the expected tax reduction effect can be achieved and the tax burden of the financial industry can be reduced after the "reform and increase" of the financial industry. This paper focuses on the banking industry in the financial industry, starting from the background of "reform and increase" in the financial industry. Taking H commercial bank as an example, combined with the characteristics of H commercial bank and related tax policies, the financial data of H commercial bank are selected to calculate the changes of tax burden of H commercial bank before and after "business reform and increase". This paper first expounds the main contents of the financial industry and the relevant policy explanations, and then takes H commercial bank as an example. This paper estimates the impact of "business reform and increase" on the tax burden of commercial banks. Then it analyzes the reasons for the change of tax burden. Finally, combining the results of calculation and the reasons for the change of tax burden, the paper analyzes the tax planning and quality training of business personnel, respectively. The financial and tax management framework is perfect, cash flow control and business direction planning are given to provide advice for the banking industry to deal with the "reform and increase" of the financial industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F812.42;F832.33;F830.42

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳飛虹;呂榮福;;“營改增”試點方案對商業(yè)銀行稅負的影響及相關(guān)建議[J];稅務(wù)與經(jīng)濟;2016年05期

2 胡怡建;;全面實施營改增的企業(yè)稅負變動影響分析[J];新會計;2016年07期

3 王曉鶴;;“營改增”對我國商業(yè)銀行稅負的影響分析[J];法制與社會;2016年18期

4 單梅;;商業(yè)銀行營改增實施探索[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟;2015年35期

5 劉金科;;金融業(yè)增值稅征稅模式的國際比較與中國制度設(shè)計[J];財政研究;2015年06期

6 中國人民銀行鄭州中心支行課題組;;金融業(yè)增值稅征收的國際比較及我國銀行業(yè)“營改增”方案研究[J];金融發(fā)展評論;2015年02期

7 王艷;;“營改增”對我國銀行業(yè)的稅負影響分析——基于2013年國內(nèi)16家上市銀行財務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)[J];海南金融;2014年12期

8 程熙忠;;淺議“營改增”對商業(yè)銀行的影響[J];東方論壇;2013年06期

9 熊鷺;;銀行業(yè)“營改增”研究——基于上市銀行的實證分析[J];西部金融;2013年11期

10 周剛;;營業(yè)稅改增值稅對銀行業(yè)的影響研究——基于寧波銀行的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];金融會計;2013年10期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 盧汝岳;夏楨媛;;銀行業(yè)“營改增”，稅率應(yīng)如何確定?[N];財會信報;2013年

，

本文編號：1641002