本文關(guān)鍵詞：S公司業(yè)績評價指標體系優(yōu)化設(shè)計　出處：《江蘇大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 業(yè)績評價 經(jīng)濟增加值(EVA) 平衡計分卡(BSC) 優(yōu)化設(shè)計

【摘要】：隨著時代推進,企業(yè)發(fā)展需求愈漸多元化,僅以傳統(tǒng)財務指標去衡量企業(yè)業(yè)績水平早已不能滿足企業(yè)發(fā)展需求。一個全面科學的業(yè)績評價體系,不僅能夠反映出企業(yè)真實的業(yè)績水平,還能對企業(yè)經(jīng)營管理過程中存在的不足加以提升改善。而且,人們?nèi)找姘l(fā)現(xiàn),相較于傳統(tǒng)財務評價體系,那些遵循企業(yè)價值導向理念的綜合業(yè)績評價體系更為有效,如經(jīng)濟增加值(EVA)、平衡計分卡(BSC)等。本文先從企業(yè)業(yè)績評價的概念理論入手,引出了EVA和BSC的相關(guān)理論和各自優(yōu)缺點,從中發(fā)掘兩種業(yè)績評價方法相互結(jié)合的互補性與可行性。而后,本文以S公司作為研究對象,介紹了S公司目前的業(yè)績評價體系,分析其存在的缺陷不足,從而提出在S公司構(gòu)建EVA和BSC相結(jié)合的業(yè)績評價體系的需求性。新的業(yè)績評價體系是以BSC為框架,以EVA為價值導向的綜合業(yè)績評價體系,兩者的結(jié)合可以在一定程度上彌補各自存在的缺憾。BSC的財務維度通常只包括一些傳統(tǒng)的財務指標,而EVA的加入可以更加全面客觀的反映企業(yè)價值創(chuàng)造結(jié)果,能夠充分的將S公司具體經(jīng)營目標和股東財富最大化相結(jié)合。其次,雖然EVA較傳統(tǒng)財務指標有很多優(yōu)勢,但是,其本質(zhì)上還是一個結(jié)果性的財務指標,無法對企業(yè)價值創(chuàng)造過程和未來發(fā)展驅(qū)動因素進行有效反映和管控,而平衡計分卡則擴展了EVA的評價范圍,使企業(yè)不再拘泥于對財務業(yè)績的評價,綜合考慮了客戶維度、內(nèi)部流程維度以及學習和成長維度。在整體構(gòu)建思路形成后,本文通過BSC四個維度層層分解S公司戰(zhàn)略目標,設(shè)定具體評價指標,通過層次分析法確定各指標權(quán)重,完成體系的構(gòu)建。最后,收集S公司相關(guān)指標數(shù)據(jù)運用到該體系中,得到對S公司業(yè)績水平的綜合評判,并對新體系實施的預期效果進行了分析。本文雖然是針對S公司構(gòu)建了新的業(yè)績評價體系,但是由于同行業(yè)企業(yè)在經(jīng)營管理過程中有諸多相似之處,因此,本文構(gòu)建的新體系對于和S公司較為相似的企業(yè)同樣具有參考和實施的價值,從而有效擴展新體系的應用范圍,幫助更多企業(yè)客觀全面的認識自身業(yè)績水平,不斷加以改善和提升,促進企業(yè)長遠健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the advance of the times, the demand for enterprise development is becoming more and more diversified, only the traditional financial indicators to measure the level of enterprise performance has not been able to meet the needs of enterprise development. A comprehensive and scientific performance evaluation system. It can not only reflect the real performance level of enterprises, but also improve the deficiencies in the process of business management. Moreover, people increasingly find that compared with the traditional financial evaluation system. Those following the enterprise value-oriented concept of comprehensive performance evaluation system is more effective, such as economic value added, balanced scorecard (BSCS), etc. This paper starts with the concept of enterprise performance evaluation theory. Draw out the relevant theory of EVA and BSC and their respective advantages and disadvantages, explore the complementarity and feasibility of the two performance evaluation methods. Then, this paper takes S Company as the research object. This paper introduces the current performance evaluation system of S Company and analyzes its shortcomings. The new performance evaluation system is a comprehensive performance evaluation system based on BSC and EVA. The combination of the two can to some extent make up for the shortcomings of each other. The financial dimension of BSC usually includes only some traditional financial indicators. The entry of EVA can more comprehensively and objectively reflect the results of enterprise value creation, and can fully combine the specific business objectives of S company with the maximization of shareholder wealth. Secondly. Although EVA has many advantages over traditional financial indicators, it is still a result of financial indicators in essence, which can not effectively reflect and control the process of enterprise value creation and the driving factors of future development. The balanced Scorecard expands the scope of EVA evaluation, so that the enterprise is no longer stuck to the evaluation of financial performance, comprehensive consideration of the customer dimension. Internal process dimension and learning and growth dimension. After the formation of the overall thinking of construction, this paper analyzes the strategic objectives of S company through four dimensions of BSC, and sets specific evaluation indicators. Through the Analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of each index to complete the construction of the system. Finally, collect the relevant index data of S company to apply to the system, and get the comprehensive evaluation of the performance level of S company. And the expected effect of the implementation of the new system is analyzed. Although this article is to build a new performance evaluation system for S company, but because of the same industry enterprises in the process of operation and management have many similarities, so. The new system constructed in this paper has the value of reference and implementation for the enterprises similar to S Company, which can effectively expand the scope of application of the new system and help more enterprises to understand their own performance level objectively and comprehensively. Continue to improve and upgrade to promote the long-term and healthy development of enterprises.
【學位授予單位】：江蘇大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426.7;F406.7

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林嘉誠;;基于平衡計分卡視角的企業(yè)并購績效評價研究——以友誼股份并購百聯(lián)股份為例[J];經(jīng)貿(mào)實踐;2015年14期

2 肖鴻清;;EVA-BSC業(yè)績評估法在企業(yè)中的實用性研究[J];中國商貿(mào);2015年09期

3 趙培沛;;平衡計分卡在營運資金績效評價中的應用[J];商業(yè)會計;2014年14期

4 王沿棋;楊久香;;EVA業(yè)績評價體系在石油石化企業(yè)中的應用研究——以JX公司為例[J];經(jīng)濟管理;2014年04期

5 程忠星;;淺談基于EVA的全面預算管理[J];會計師;2013年12期

6 譚寧;;基于公司價值最大化的業(yè)績評價體系構(gòu)建——EVA與BSC的集成研究[J];國際商務研究;2013年03期

7 范經(jīng)華;;基于平衡計分卡的內(nèi)部審計質(zhì)量控制評價指標體系探討[J];審計研究;2013年02期

8 張瑞林;王曉芳;王先亮;;基于平衡計分卡的全民健身公共服務績效管理[J];成都體育學院學報;2013年01期

9 張沁;;現(xiàn)代企業(yè)績效管理探索[J];浙江經(jīng)濟;2012年20期

10 白勝;;平衡計分卡理論研究展望[J];財會月刊;2012年24期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 曹宏林;華能國際基于EVA和BSC業(yè)績評價體系設(shè)計[D];中國海洋大學;2013年

2 鄧羽婷;基于EVA的企業(yè)業(yè)績評價研究[D];中南林業(yè)科技大學;2013年

3 成立;H公司業(yè)績評價體系研究[D];湖南大學;2012年

4 王新玉;基于BSC的EVA和ABC融合的企業(yè)業(yè)績評價研究[D];江蘇科技大學;2012年

5 彭桂英;基于EVA的價值管理在通信企業(yè)應用研究[D];北京郵電大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1374005