三大經(jīng)濟(jì)都市圈的金融產(chǎn)業(yè)極化擴(kuò)散研究
本文選題:三大經(jīng)濟(jì)都市圈 切入點(diǎn):北京 出處:《上海社會科學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文
【摘要】:金融是現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)的主要推動力之一,金融活動在空間上通過極化效應(yīng),不斷地向某些地方或區(qū)域持續(xù)集聚,形成了不同的地區(qū)金融中心,并通過擴(kuò)散效應(yīng)形成了金融的區(qū)域分布。三大都市圈在中國的經(jīng)濟(jì)體系中有舉足輕重的地位,北京所在的環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟(jì)圈是中國的政治中心,而.且北京,天津的金融創(chuàng)新在近年發(fā)展顯著,以上海為中心的長三角都市圈是中國重要的經(jīng)濟(jì)中心地區(qū)之一,一直以來在中國整體的財(cái)政和稅收都有巨大占比,而且上,F(xiàn)在致力于成為國際金融中心,金融產(chǎn)業(yè)的未來走向成為了重點(diǎn)探討的方向;而珠三角地區(qū)靠近香港,是中國改革開放最早的地區(qū),第三產(chǎn)業(yè)占比一直很高,中小企業(yè)集聚明顯,2007年金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)以來,全球經(jīng)濟(jì)動蕩,國際金融形勢復(fù)雜,為中國經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展提供了機(jī)遇和挑戰(zhàn),F(xiàn)階段京津滬深興起的建立金融中心之爭,我們?nèi)绾握_認(rèn)識幾地的金融產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,幾地對所在區(qū)域的金融的聯(lián)系和影響有何不同?客觀上需要對這幾個(gè)城市所在區(qū)域的金融情況有更加深入的了解。而這些其實(shí)就是要對這幾個(gè)區(qū)域進(jìn)行金融集聚研究。因?yàn)楦闱宄@些區(qū)域的金融集聚情況,才可以為京津滬深金融中心之爭的最客觀的判據(jù),是制定中國的金融中心發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略乃至金融發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略合理的理論依據(jù)。 本文通過對經(jīng)濟(jì)和金融產(chǎn)業(yè)的極化和擴(kuò)散進(jìn)行了梳理,針對金融產(chǎn)業(yè)的極化和擴(kuò)散進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析。極化方面考慮到了三大都市圈的組間同質(zhì)性較高,就采取了沒有附加基尼系數(shù)的ER模型進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析,而擴(kuò)散方面,則采用了VAR模型進(jìn)行脈沖相應(yīng)方程分析,得到了關(guān)于三大都市圈的金融發(fā)展擴(kuò)散水平研究。最后根據(jù)研究的結(jié)論提出了相應(yīng)的政策建議。
[Abstract]:Finance is one of the main driving forces of modern economy. Through polarization effect in space, financial activities continue to gather to some places or regions, forming different regional financial centers. The three metropolitan areas play an important role in China's economic system. The Bohai Rim Economic Circle, where Beijing is located, is the political center of China, and Beijing, Financial innovation in Tianjin has developed significantly in recent years. The Yangtze River Delta Metropolitan area, with Shanghai as the center, is one of the most important economic centers in China, and has always had a huge share in the overall fiscal and tax revenue of China. Moreover, Shanghai is now committed to becoming an international financial center, and the future direction of the financial industry has become the focus of discussion. The Pearl River Delta region, close to Hong Kong, is the earliest region in China to open up to the outside world, and the proportion of the tertiary industry has always been very high. Since the outbreak of the financial crisis in 2007, the global economic turmoil and the complex international financial situation have provided opportunities and challenges for the development of China's economy. How can we correctly understand the development of financial industry in several places, and how do these places have any difference in the financial links and impacts in their respective regions? Objectively speaking, it is necessary to have a deeper understanding of the financial situation in the regions where these cities are located. And these are actually the studies of financial agglomeration in these regions, because it is necessary to find out the financial agglomeration situation in these regions. The most objective criterion of the dispute between Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai and Shenzhen is the reasonable theoretical basis for formulating the development strategy of China's financial center and even the financial development strategy. In this paper, the polarization and diffusion of the economic and financial industries are combed, and the polarization and diffusion of the financial industry are analyzed empirically. The polarization takes into account the high homogeneity among the three metropolitan areas. The ER model without Gini coefficient is used for empirical analysis, while the VAR model is used for the pulse equation analysis in diffusion. The financial development and diffusion level of the three metropolitan areas is studied, and the corresponding policy suggestions are put forward according to the conclusion of the study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:上海社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:F832.7;F127
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鄭長德;;中國金融發(fā)展地區(qū)差異的泰爾指數(shù)分解及其形成因素分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年04期
2 趙志君;金融資產(chǎn)總量、結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[J];管理世界;2000年03期
3 孫德軒;;金融體系發(fā)展水平相關(guān)指標(biāo)的國際比較[J];中國管理信息化(綜合版);2007年04期
4 金學(xué)群;金融發(fā)展理論:一個(gè)文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];國外社會科學(xué);2004年01期
5 劉澍;;金融發(fā)展指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)成及其在金融發(fā)展理論實(shí)證分析中的應(yīng)用[J];黑龍江金融;2009年07期
6 李仁貴;西方區(qū)域發(fā)展理論的主要流派及其演進(jìn)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)評論;2005年06期
7 謝平;;中國金融資產(chǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1992年11期
8 蔡f ,都陽;中國地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的趨同與差異——對西部開發(fā)戰(zhàn)略的啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2000年10期
9 周業(yè)安;章泉;;參數(shù)異質(zhì)性、經(jīng)濟(jì)趨同與中國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年01期
10 張杰;中國的貨幣化進(jìn)程、金融控制及改革困境[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1997年08期
,本文編號:1680550
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/bankxd/1680550.html